Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But why would Pak government release one pilot and not the other? Both had committed aggression against Pak...so either they were both to be held responsible or something like that...or both released?HUD camera most likely.
There is an eye witness account that explains that the other pilot was injured and limping. The one that was taken to the CMH and hinted by DG ISPR in first presser.
But why would Pak government release one pilot and not the other? Both had committed aggression against Pak...so either they were both to be held responsible or something like that...or both released?
We can't just hold one and release the other for the same crime(for the lack of a better word).
New Recruit
But why would Pak government release one pilot and not the other? Both had committed aggression against Pak...so either they were both to be held responsible or something like that...or both released?
We can't just hold one and release the other for the same crime(for the lack of a better word).
That would explain the old baba in one of the videos earlier. He mentioned 02 others and that one was a Sikh/Sardar.SU-30 is a Sikh pilot who is in Pak Army Custody and apparently he is a Squadron Leader
Lol, how can we release a pilot if Indian force is saying we didnt loose any SU-30 pilot
Yes it is our choice when to release but why speedy release of one while no mention(other than that first time) and withholding of the other? Makes no logical sense. It's like if a court released one robber while jailed the other for the same robbery...seems arbitrary.Its our choice when to release, he is a POW after all. Also, he was injured.
Yes it is our choice when to release but why speedy release of one while no mention(other than that first time) and withholding of the other? Makes no logical sense. It's like if a court released one robber while jailed the other for the same robbery...seems arbitrary.
HUD camera most likely.
There is an eye witness account that explains that the other pilot was injured and limping. The one that was taken to the CMH and hinted by DG ISPR in first presser.
If the pilot was a sikh then i understand everything, the secrecy the controversial, we pakistaniz like and respect sikhs and our government wouldn't want to hurt sikh communitybin india or pakistan. Also we would avoid making a political scene with it.SU-30 is a Sikh pilot who is in Pak Army Custody and apparently he is a Squadron Leader
I don't care for Indian media's lies. I'm interested in proof of our claims of shooting down a Su30.Lol, how can we release a pilot if Indian force is saying we didnt loose any SU-30 pilot
I am feeling like ISPR will be doing another conference with more details and maybe another pilot with Su-30 kill. Its in Pakistan's interest to show the SU-30MKI kill because:
1. Completely discredits IAF
2. More importantly completely discredits Modi's gov
3. Easy to forward the narrative that Modi gov tried to disown their own.
4. Indian people have high feelings for their troops, #3 means he will massively lose support
5. For peace efforts we don't want terrorist like Modi ruling India
6. Unrelated to India but SU-30MKI kill would bolster JF-17 sale and exports.
So if we want peace, which surely can't happen under Modi, completely destroying the trust people have in Modi's gov is important. And nothing can destroy trust in them than showing that indeed there was a 2nd Indian aircraft destroyed, and HOPEFULLY we have another pilot in custody to prove it (as Indians will say video evidence was edited/fake)
This would be a great opportunity to destroy Modi's gov. Of course this is only if we have indisputable evidence.
Yes it is our choice when to release but why speedy release of one while no mention(other than that first time) and withholding of the other? Makes no logical sense. It's like if a court released one robber while jailed the other for the same robbery...seems arbitrary.
Not exactly true. By calling him a PoW, you automatically have to hand him/them over according to the 'Geneva Convention'.Its our choice when to release, he is a POW after all. Also, he was injured.
I disagree as far as kicking Modi out of power. I think he should be reelected as many times as possible...it's good for Pak. He will tear them apart from within by creating more and more hatred.Never reveal all your cards.
If we have card which we could use to influence the election in India in order to make narendra boody out of power then, all bad is this episode, we could say it’s a gift to us from Allah.
I maybe wrong off course