Wa Muhammada
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2017
- Messages
- 1,463
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
That’s what I’v been thinking .. somewhere where we least expected and have less forces
PAF put on High Alert, low level fighter jets scramble reported near LoC: Media Report
- Thread starter Beskar
- Start date
That’s what I’v been thinking .. somewhere where we least expected and have less forces
mshan44
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2014
- Messages
- 727
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Baghial
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
- Messages
- 5,742
- Reaction score
- -28
- Country
- Location
The terrorist attack at Pulwama, killing 40 Indian soldiers, provides Narendra Modi a huge but risky chance to portray himself as the toughest politician in India. Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s victory in the 1999 Kargil war helped him win the next general election. Can Modi use Pulwama to do the same?
He must avoid military action, which could backfire badly. Far wiser would be new forms of political theatre, similar to his “surgical strikes” in 2016, in retaliation for the attack on our armed forces at Uri. That satisfied the public demand for action without risking dangerous escalation into all-out war.
Something similar is needed now.???????????????????????????
I call the surgical strikes political theatre because they were strategically empty and militarily only fleabites. In some cases, Indian troops went barely a kilometre or two into Pakistani territory. The damage they did was so modest that Pakistan’s first reaction was to deny that anything had happened beyond the usual border skirmishes. One Pakistani official sneered, “How is it possible that the target of a surgical strike has no idea it took place?”
This explained why Pakistan did not retaliate. Fleabites do not cause military escalation. However, the surgical strikes were portrayed by Modi, and hailed by the Indian media, as a great military success. It burnished the image of Modi as a strong leader who taught Pakistan lessons that earlier Congress governments dared not.
Once the euphoria abated, events soon proved that the surgical strikes were a strategic flop. They failed to check terrorism or Pakistani support for it. Insurgency-related fatalities in Kashmir actually went up from 267 in 2016 to 358 in 2017, and estimated infiltrations from 371 to 406. Civilian deaths increased by 166%. Now, the Pulwama attack proves that the surgical strikes have not deterred future attacks.
But even if the surgical strikes failed strategically, they constituted clever political theatre. A good politician satisfies the public blood lust and demand for revenge by finding solutions that soothe angry voters without risking dangerous military escalation. The surgical strike was good politics, even if strategically empty.
Between now and the elections, can Modi launch another surgical strike or bombing of terrorist camps in Pakistan? Very risky. After the last strikes, Pakistan warned of retaliation against even fleabites. It is on 100% military alert, every possible target is guarded, and contingency planning for retaliation is complete. Last time India took Pakistan by surprise. That’s now impossible.
If India attempts another surgical strike but suffers heavy casualties, Modi will be castigated by opposition parties, and could lose rather than gain votes. Ditto if Modi sends bombers across the border to hit terrorist camps, and Pakistani missiles shoot these down. Remember US president Jimmy Carter’s attempt to rescue US hostages in Iran in 1978? His helicopters were caught in a storm and crashed. He had hoped that a dramatic rescue would help him win the next election, but the fiasco ensured that he lost. This holds a lesson for Modi.
Pakistani PM Imran Khan has to defend his own tough image, and is determined not to allow an Indian victory. He is well armed and can inflict substantial damage. To begin with, a military exchange may be limited to military targets, but if Pakistan seems to be losing, Khan will surely raise the ante and attack economic targets. Pakistan’s missiles can easily smash nearby targets like Gujarat’s giant refineries and Bombay High offshore fields, crippling oil supplies. India can hit Pakistani refineries and power stations too. But even if escalation to nuclear weapons is avoided, the result will be massive mutual economic damage that does nothing to solve terrorism, and will probably worsen it.
One alternative is covert action to attack targets in Pakistan. This is unlikely to provoke military retaliation, and so reduces the risk of outright war. India must have undercover agents in Pakistan, but their effectiveness is unproven. All worthwhile targets in Pakistan are on high alert, so attackers could be decimated.
There remains innovative political theatre. Many old terrorist camps, or offices of terrorist leaders, may be mostly empty or inactive. Hence they may be unguarded or lightly guarded. Why not use covert action to blow these up, and then exaggerate the damage done and casualties inflicted? Much creative video manipulation is possible to give the impression of a major success. The media will readily lap up tales of victory, and opposition parties will look unpatriotic if they object.
This is only one example of theatre. Modi can doubtless think up others.
Is this too cynical? No more so than the surgical strikes.
He must avoid military action, which could backfire badly. Far wiser would be new forms of political theatre, similar to his “surgical strikes” in 2016, in retaliation for the attack on our armed forces at Uri. That satisfied the public demand for action without risking dangerous escalation into all-out war.
Something similar is needed now.???????????????????????????
I call the surgical strikes political theatre because they were strategically empty and militarily only fleabites. In some cases, Indian troops went barely a kilometre or two into Pakistani territory. The damage they did was so modest that Pakistan’s first reaction was to deny that anything had happened beyond the usual border skirmishes. One Pakistani official sneered, “How is it possible that the target of a surgical strike has no idea it took place?”
This explained why Pakistan did not retaliate. Fleabites do not cause military escalation. However, the surgical strikes were portrayed by Modi, and hailed by the Indian media, as a great military success. It burnished the image of Modi as a strong leader who taught Pakistan lessons that earlier Congress governments dared not.
Once the euphoria abated, events soon proved that the surgical strikes were a strategic flop. They failed to check terrorism or Pakistani support for it. Insurgency-related fatalities in Kashmir actually went up from 267 in 2016 to 358 in 2017, and estimated infiltrations from 371 to 406. Civilian deaths increased by 166%. Now, the Pulwama attack proves that the surgical strikes have not deterred future attacks.
But even if the surgical strikes failed strategically, they constituted clever political theatre. A good politician satisfies the public blood lust and demand for revenge by finding solutions that soothe angry voters without risking dangerous military escalation. The surgical strike was good politics, even if strategically empty.
Between now and the elections, can Modi launch another surgical strike or bombing of terrorist camps in Pakistan? Very risky. After the last strikes, Pakistan warned of retaliation against even fleabites. It is on 100% military alert, every possible target is guarded, and contingency planning for retaliation is complete. Last time India took Pakistan by surprise. That’s now impossible.
If India attempts another surgical strike but suffers heavy casualties, Modi will be castigated by opposition parties, and could lose rather than gain votes. Ditto if Modi sends bombers across the border to hit terrorist camps, and Pakistani missiles shoot these down. Remember US president Jimmy Carter’s attempt to rescue US hostages in Iran in 1978? His helicopters were caught in a storm and crashed. He had hoped that a dramatic rescue would help him win the next election, but the fiasco ensured that he lost. This holds a lesson for Modi.
Pakistani PM Imran Khan has to defend his own tough image, and is determined not to allow an Indian victory. He is well armed and can inflict substantial damage. To begin with, a military exchange may be limited to military targets, but if Pakistan seems to be losing, Khan will surely raise the ante and attack economic targets. Pakistan’s missiles can easily smash nearby targets like Gujarat’s giant refineries and Bombay High offshore fields, crippling oil supplies. India can hit Pakistani refineries and power stations too. But even if escalation to nuclear weapons is avoided, the result will be massive mutual economic damage that does nothing to solve terrorism, and will probably worsen it.
One alternative is covert action to attack targets in Pakistan. This is unlikely to provoke military retaliation, and so reduces the risk of outright war. India must have undercover agents in Pakistan, but their effectiveness is unproven. All worthwhile targets in Pakistan are on high alert, so attackers could be decimated.
There remains innovative political theatre. Many old terrorist camps, or offices of terrorist leaders, may be mostly empty or inactive. Hence they may be unguarded or lightly guarded. Why not use covert action to blow these up, and then exaggerate the damage done and casualties inflicted? Much creative video manipulation is possible to give the impression of a major success. The media will readily lap up tales of victory, and opposition parties will look unpatriotic if they object.
This is only one example of theatre. Modi can doubtless think up others.
Is this too cynical? No more so than the surgical strikes.
SecularNationalist
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 8,046
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
aa ja balma tera intezaar hai 
Basel
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2013
- Messages
- 9,504
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Bhai Cold Start ka Matlab Cold Start ab Cold koi start hota hai??
Verve
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 15, 2014
- Messages
- 11,116
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
Flood ..
Baghial
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
- Messages
- 5,742
- Reaction score
- -28
- Country
- Location
araz
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 9,291
- Reaction score
- 81
Good luck with that war then. Funny that we existed together in reasonable state of existence from 48 to 65 with trade on going. If you have war then in 3 centuries there will be a region rich in coal to pick coal from. So what if it glows in the dark. Since 71 to date we have had problems occasionally with minor skirmishes but no frank war. You would wonder why!!!.
Incidentally I am getting increasingly despondent at the lack of intellect in the average reader but then who am I to dare to do so.
This forum is an opinion forum where you have a right to express your opinion as much as I have to express mine. I understand you dont agree with my opinion, but does that give you the right to call it nonsense?
Any ways please carry on carrying on.
A
Kaka this wont last that long. This is election blustre and will die down with the election.
A
Last edited:
Ghareeb_Da_Baal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2008
- Messages
- 6,654
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
M. Sarmad
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2013
- Messages
- 7,022
- Reaction score
- 62
- Country
- Location
You, of course, are entitled to your opinions no matter how stupid or ill-founded they are but when you post nonsense on open forums do expect to get called out on your BS.
Pakistan has nothing to do with Pulwama Attack, nor has any Pakistani claimed responsibility for the attack.... So, please stop spewing nonsense.
Stop tainting everyone with the same brush. We are not advocating aggression or war, the Indians are doing so... We have every right to defend ourselves with all available means.
And it's actually funny that you consider your own intellect to be above that of an average reader.. Your posts clearly prove otherwise...
Anyway, carry on ...
Arsalan 345
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2016
- Messages
- 3,859
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
i agree.this is a possibility.
https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/...4-the-kinetic-alternatives-1461411-2019-02-22
Signalian
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2015
- Messages
- 10,608
- Reaction score
- 305
- Country
- Location
It will be naive to think that PA is not in contact with Chinese for surveillance on Indian movement.
VCheng
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2010
- Messages
- 48,460
- Reaction score
- 57
- Country
- Location
I disagree. Pakistan and India will keep themselves in penury and abysmal social development until economic collapse, that is the only inevitable outcome of their present policies. Which side will totter first remains to be seen, but likely the smaller economy.
This present chest thumping will soon fade away like the froth on certain amber liquids.
Arsalan 345
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2016
- Messages
- 3,859
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
everyone deserves to respond or write anything.he is pdf think tank consultant.he understands things better than us.kindly respect each other.we must not fight with each other.our enemy is india.focus on india my friend.
Ultima Thule
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2012
- Messages
- 16,725
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Bro nothing will happen, it just a election stunt, they (India) knows that Pakistan wasn't involved in Paulwama attack, keep calm he is the senior member @M. Sarmad
Similar threads
