What's new

Oil, Gas and Refinery Projects update

In a major development, Pakistan and Russia are set to formally sign an amended Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) for the flagship project of North-South Gas Pipeline (NSGPP) in Moscow today.

Soon after the formal signing, the pipeline project will be renamed as Pakistan Stream Gas Pipeline (PGSP). The cost of the project has been estimated at $2.25 billion by Pakistani officials, which is not yet finalised by the Russian side.

Later, the cost will be decided keeping in view the scope of the project, a senior official at the Energy Ministry told The News. “Under the revised IGA, Pakistan will be having the major shareholding with 74 percent stakes in the pipeline of 1,122 kilometers from Karachi (Port Qasim) to Kasur (Punjab). And Russia will have 26 per cent equity.”
 
.
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and Russia on Friday signed an inter-government agreement (IGA) to develop Pakistan Stream Gas Pipeline for gas transportation from Karachi to Kasur.

Russian Energy Minister Nikolai Shulginov and Pakistan’s ambassador in Moscow Shafqat Ali Khan signed a protocol on the amendments to the IGA on North-South Gas Pipeline Project in Moscow, according to the Pakistan Embassy in Russia.

As per the protocol, the project has been renamed as “Pakistan Stream Gas Pipeline”.

The pipeline project is a flagship strategic venture between Pakistan and Russia that would strengthen bilateral cooperation.

Published in Dawn, May 29th, 2021


1622292395012.png
 
Last edited:
. .
Hi,

Rather than FSRUs, government should have given some incentives and pushed for onshore terminals with ample storage capacity. We will be seeing an article like following from the next government's Petroleum minister, if they have not planned any onshore storage facilities, which I believe is the case here.


The government is in a very early stage of discussions for developing above ground storage facilities for LNG, Vopak is a natural first choice, owing to their LPG storage facility at Karachi, with a 80,000+ cubic meters installed capacity. But still an onshore regasification facility would have been much better than leasing of FSRUs, specially when the planned construction time period is 24 months, hopefully it is also in consideration.


 
.
LNG plants to be free of merit order

CCOE expected to give exemption to ease pressure on SNGPL pipeline network


Zafar Bhutta
June 17, 2021

11600456731-0.jpg



ISLAMABAD: The Cabinet Committee on Energy (CCOE) is likely to approve a plan to free liquefied natural gas (LNG)-based power plants from the economic merit order in a bid to ease pressure on a gas utility’s pipeline network, but the move will put an additional burden on gas consumers.

The CCOE has already exempted the LNG-based power plants from 66% guaranteed off take of LNG, triggering financial trouble for gas utility Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) and the power plants.

As the power sector is not willing to take LNG supplies, the public gas utilities are also reluctant to allow the private sector start LNG imports to reduce the financial risk for energy companies.
In the past, SNGPL was put at risk several times and the company was compelled to request Pakistan State Oil (PSO) to curtail LNG supplies to safeguard its pipeline network from excessive gas pressure.

Under the “economic dispatch” mechanism, the primary responsibility of system operator – National Power Construction Corporation (NPCC) - is to achieve the “lowest cost” while ensuring system integrity, security, reliability and quality of supply.

Merit order is a ranking of thermal power plants based on ascending order of specific cost (fuel cost plus variable operation and maintenance cost) per unit of the power plants/units. The merit order is one variable in the economic dispatch process.

Other factors required to be considered by the system operator in the economic dispatch include plant availability, fuel availability, system constraints, take-or-pay fuel contracts, startups/shutdowns, ramping rates, stability reserves, etc.

According to the Grid Code, the operation of power generation facilities according to the merit order is strictly desired under “normal system conditions.” However, when required, subject to the factors discussed, the deviation from the merit order is allowed.

The power sector is a major stakeholder in the re-gasified LNG supply chain. Any disturbances in RLNG supply/demand affect the economic dispatch of power and create high line pack issues in the gas transmission system.

In cases where RLNG supply is below the firm order, the basket price of electricity becomes higher compared to the situation when supply follows demand. The lower supply of RLNG also causes operational constraints and creates system stability issues for the system operator.

On the other hand, the basket price is also affected when the plants are forced to accommodate RLNG oversupply by the gas companies. The take-or-pay contractual arrangements for the three RLNG based power plants specify the minimum fuel offtake requirement of 66% annually as established under the Annual Production Plan.

RLNG offtake lesser than the firm requirement of 66% creates financial liabilities for the power sector, in the form of net proceeds differential on account of diversion of firm RLNG requirement to other industries.

Similarly, non-compliance by SNGPL with the firm RLNG orders leads to liquidated damages, to be collected from the gas utility, for failure to supply the committed RLNG to the power sector, and commercial disputes between government-owned entities under the Power and Petroleum Divisions.

To protect the SNGPL pipeline network from damage, the Power Division has asked the CCOE to allow deviation from the economic merit order on account of operational system constraints, leading to mandatory consumption of RLNG.

It also suggested that the cost of variation in the merit order should be passed on to other gas sector consumers (excluding the power sector). Accordingly, the Power Division will claim the cost of such deviation every month from SNGPL, which will be adjusted within 30 days of such claim.
 
.
Saudi Arabia has agreed to restart oil aid to Pakistan

Saudi Arabia has agreed to restart oil aid to Pakistan worth at least $1.5 billion annually in July, according to officials in Islamabad, as Riyadh works to counter Iran’s influence in the region.
The acrimony between the two long-time allies has eased after Prime Minister Imran Khan met Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in May, according to Financial Time.

News of the oil deal with Pakistan comes as Saudi Arabia embarks on a diplomatic push with the US and Qatar to build a front against Iran, said analysts. Riyadh lifted a three-year blockade of Qatar in January in what experts said was an attempt to curry favour with the newly elected Joe Biden.

Pakistan had shifted closer to Saudi Arabia’s regional rivals Iran and Turkey, which, along with Malaysia, have sought to establish a Muslim bloc to rival the Saudi-led Organisation of Islamic Cooperation.

Khan has developed a strong rapport with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, encouraging Pakistanis to watch the Turkish historical television series Dirilis Ertugrul (Ertugrul’s Resurrection) for its depiction of Islamic values.




May be an image of 2 people and people standing
 
.
Pakistan Oil and Gas Production.
Pakistan's oil and gas production remained relatively stagnant in June 2021, averaging over 70,000 barrels of oil per day and around 3400 million standard cubic feet of gas per day.
© Business Recorder


1624537943196.png
 
.
Pakistan gets $4.5 Billion facility for oil LNG imports

Pakistan has secured a $4.5 billion worth of three-year trade financing facility from Jeddah-based Islamic Trade Corporation (ITFC) to cover import cost of crude, petroleum products and liquefied natural gas (LNG).
A formal financing framework agreement on the arrangement would be signed early next week here. The funds would be utilised under Annual Financing Plan of roughly $1.5bn each.

This trade financing arrangement is in addition to about $531 million already signed by Ministry of Economic Affairs with Saudi Fund for Development (SFD) for project financing of Mohmand dam, a couple of coal based projects besides a few hydropower projects including two in Azad Kashmir.

The ITFC’s financing would be utilised over three years (2021-23) by Pak-Arab Refinery Ltd (Parco), Pakistan State Oil (PSO) and Pakistan LNG Ltd (PLL) for import of crude oil, refined petroleum products and LNG and help augment the country’s foreign currency reserves and provide resources to meet the oil import bill.


1624643240516.png
 
.
CCoE asks PD to decide whether it wants to build PSGP or LNG-III pipeline

Khalid Mustafa

June 25, 2021

ISLAMABAD:
The Cabinet Committee on Energy (CCoE), in its meeting on Thursday, asked the Petroleum Division (PD) to come up with a clear mind after one month if it wanted to build the Pakistan Stream Gas Pipeline (PSGP) with 26 percent shareholding of Russian government, or it wants to build LNG-III pipeline under the consortium of Sui Southern, Sui Northern and PAPCO – the company of PARCO.

The Petroleum Division wants to build the LNG-III pipeline as an alternative project in case talks with Russia fail on the PSGP, which is also known as North-South Gas Pipeline. The Petroleum Division has made the alternative proposal based on Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) decision, taken on January 5, 2018, under which the financing was also approved for the 1.2 billion cubic feet per day gas (BCFD) capacity RLNG-III pipeline of 1,150 kilometres from Karachi to Lahore with 42 inches diameter.
The Supreme Court, in its verdict in 2020 on Gas Infrastructure Development Cess (GIDC) recovery, had named North-South Gas Pipeline Project that it should be built by using the amount of GIDC, but the new leadership at Petroleum Division now wanted to build LNG-III pipeline with the amount of GIDC as an alternative plan.

The CCoE also asked the Petroleum Division to come up with a firm project proposal after one month’s time as the government did not afford any delay in building the infrastructure required to suck in more LNG in the country’s system. The country is facing a gas shortage and the required infrastructure is also needed to import more LNG. And to this effect, two LNG terminals – Enargas and Tabeer – have also managed the construction and capacity pipeline to have the financial closure.
Petroleum Division (PD) pitched in the CCoE meeting a pipeline proposal as a contingency plan from consortium of SSGC, SNGPL and PAPCO saying PD will also ensure participation of local companies in the EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction or EPC) and operations and maintenance (O&M) contracts, local manufacturing of pipeline, and maximum local technical and human resource contribution.
Under the proposal, the PD sought CCoE’s guidance on the three issues which include a) Policy directions on SHA (Share-holding Agreement) negotiations, project structure and financing arrangements; b) Firm commitment from Finance Division for advance release of GIDC instalments, commensurate with project expenditures; and c) Evolving understanding on contingency plan in case of deadlock with Russia.
The summary of the Petroleum Division also mentions that the Government of Pakistan and Government of Russian Federation signed the protocol on the amendments to the Inter-governmental Agreement (IGA) on the cooperation for the development of the PSGP project on May 28, 2021 in Moscow, Russia. The Protocol envisaged signing of a Share-holders Agreement (SHA) within 60 days from the signing of the Protocol (on July 27, 2021).
And to this effect, a draft on SHA approved by the Technical Committee, headed by the secretary petroleum was shared with the Russian Ministry of Energy on Dec 23, 2020 during the Second Meeting of the Russia Pakistan Joint Technical Committee on the project. In response, the Russian side proposed a “Heads of Terms” for SHA on March 17, 2021. The critical aspects of SHA which are also enumerated in the Heads of Terms which say that a) The Project will be implemented through a Special Purpose Company (SPC) to be incorporated in Islamabad, Pakistan; b) ISGS will have majority shareholding in the SPC (74%), while the Russian Nominated Entity will have up to 26% shares; and c) The Chairman of the Board and CEO of the Company will be nominated by ISGS, while the Project Head/Chief Technical Officer will be of Russian Nominated Entity (RNE).
3.This Division has received through MoFA a letter dated June 10, 2021 from N Shulginov, Minister of Energy of the Russian Federation. Through this correspondence, the Russian Ministry of Energy has informed that the Russian Nominated Entity for the Project has been incorporated as PAKSTREAM LLC (having registration number 1217700101211). The Russian side has written that they would like to commence negotiations on the appropriate agreements including banking instruments and commercial contracts, while indicating the readiness of representatives of PAKSTREAM LLC to arrive in Pakistan as soon as possible to do so.

The summary also says that at this point, key challenges to be addressed at the earliest include: local companies’ participation in EPC contract through local or international JV; GIDC component of financing deposited in Federal Account # 1; route alignment NOC by MoD (ministry of defence), land acquisition; completion of Project Feasibility - PPRA exemption under process for engagement of NESPAK; and alignment of completion of Project with COD of new LNG terminals.






Extremely disappointed with this development. A complete shitshow by new Petroleum Div leadership. I hope some sanity must prevail and Foreign Office, PMO must intervene and sort PD's (lack of) management, (in)competency, lack of planning and limited foresight.

Although, above ground storage is a welcome news, and much needed, but it will be wise to develop an onshore regasification terminal along with it. In absence of such a facility and reliance on leased FSRU units solely (which are manned and operated completely by foreigners) will be disastrous, a logistical nightmare and a folly of exponential proportion. It seems PD has learnt nothing from their dry-docking self made fiasco.

Since we are going to pay for jetty, loading arms, land acquisition costs, storage tank(s) infrastructure (Boil off gas (BOG) compressor, Cryo units, utilities etc), facility piping, transport pipelines from our own pockets (GIDC), why are we so shy to invest another $60-70m on boiler and vaporisor units and say, another 25m on land acquisition (for these additional facilities)? Instead of more FSRU based terminals, Pakistan should provide incentives to Tabeer, Energas, and Engro in terms of tax breaks similar to ones given to oil refiners, and we will not only have three onshore regasification terminals but also three to six storage tanks (180,000 cubic m each, usually a terminal is constructed with two storage tanks). Any sane government whose RLNG component of Energy mix is 20-25% would have chosen an asset of its own yesterday over any leased asset. This is a thousand fold blunder in making compared to Shahid Khaqan's PGPL terminal mess up.

@niaz sb, @ziaulislam @Patriot forever how do you see these developments? Frankly speaking, I had better hopes from IK led government.
 
.
ISGS MD dropped from TAPI delegation
Lower rank official becomes part of committee to negotiate gas price with Turkmenistan


Zafar Bhutta July 07, 2021

Gas-pipeline1606593954-1.jpg


ISLAMABAD:
The government has dropped name of Inter Gas State Systems (ISGS) managing director (md) from a delegation to negotiate gas price with Turkmenistan under the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) pipeline project.
The ISGS MD had been signatory of TAPI gas sales purchase agreement (GSPA). The former managing director had signed the agreement for the gas pipeline project and the role of current MD will also be as signatory of revised GSPA.
However, he has been dropped from the negotiation committee and a low rank official has been made part of the committee that is set to negotiate gas price with Turkmenistan. Pakistan had raised the issue of revising gas prices with Turkmenistan following import of LNG in the country. Under the GSPA, Pakistan and Turkmenistan are bound to revise gas price if Pakistan or any other country is able to bring gas at lower prices.
Now, Pakistan claimed that it had imported LNG at cheaper rates compared to gas price under TAPI gas pipeline project. Turkmenistan had built the pipeline in its territory and planned to build pipeline in Afghanistan.
The Afghan Taliban have recently taken over the area of Afghanistan, however, they had announced earlier that they would not sabotage the pipeline project. Tajikistan and Turkmenistan were already exporting electricity to the different areas of the Afghanistan over a decade. However, they never hit the electricity installation.
Amendment in agreements
Pakistan and Turkmenistan had already signed the GSPA and now, the negotiation committee will discuss the revised prices under GSPA.
The government has constituted a delegation comprising of members from different ministries and gas companies to conduct meeting with the Turkmenistan side for deliberation and finalisation of the proposed amendments in GSPA and Gas Transportation Agreement (GTA) of the TAPI project.
The delegation comprised of Petroleum Division secretary, additional attorney general, Ministry of Finance representative, ISGS technical GM, ISGS legal DMG, Sui Northern Gas Pipelines (SNGPL) MD, DG Gas, and Sui Southern Gas Company (SSGC) MD. The proposed date and time for the subject meeting is July 8, 2021 in the Ministry of Energy (Petroleum Division). The agenda of the meeting will be to discuss and finalise the proposed amendments in GSPA and GTA of TAPI project. The meeting will be held on Zoom.
Transportation agreement
The cabinet has also approved transportation agreement with Turkmenistan. Pakistan will receive a transportation fee against supply of gas in its territory.
Now, Pakistan and Turkmenistan are to sign this agreement. Before this agreement, both the sides are going to discuss modalities of the agreement.
Regarding revision in gas price, Pakistan has been pressing Turkmenistan to revise gas price as it has been receiving LNG at cheaper rates. However, Turkmenistan has been claiming that TAPI gas was still cheaper compared to LNG. To settle this matter, President Arif Alvi had taken up the issue with the Turkmenistan president following which the latter agreed to revise the gas price.
Officials said that the two sides would also discuss entry point of gas delivery. Earlier, the entry point was Turkmenistan border. However, Pakistan wants to designate Pakistan-Afghanistan entry point for gas delivery. The Turkmenistan side had agreed to this and will discuss further on July 8.
The Pakistani side had informed that it would not take responsibility for any gas in Afghan territory and will only be responsible for gas in Pakistan territory.
Future of TAPI
Experts say that different countries have been importing LNG at stop gap arrangement. They normally import 6%. However, Pakistan’s import had reached 24%.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 7th, 2021.
Like
Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.





They should also start renegotiating with Iran. Glad to see government paying attention to these Zardari era expensive GSPAs. Lets hope the negotiators can do a better job this time around and convince Turkmenistan to change from oil benchmarks to gas ones.
 
Last edited:
.
CCoE asks PD to decide whether it wants to build PSGP or LNG-III pipeline

Khalid Mustafa

June 25, 2021

ISLAMABAD:
The Cabinet Committee on Energy (CCoE), in its meeting on Thursday, asked the Petroleum Division (PD) to come up with a clear mind after one month if it wanted to build the Pakistan Stream Gas Pipeline (PSGP) with 26 percent shareholding of Russian government, or it wants to build LNG-III pipeline under the consortium of Sui Southern, Sui Northern and PAPCO – the company of PARCO.

The Petroleum Division wants to build the LNG-III pipeline as an alternative project in case talks with Russia fail on the PSGP, which is also known as North-South Gas Pipeline. The Petroleum Division has made the alternative proposal based on Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) decision, taken on January 5, 2018, under which the financing was also approved for the 1.2 billion cubic feet per day gas (BCFD) capacity RLNG-III pipeline of 1,150 kilometres from Karachi to Lahore with 42 inches diameter.
The Supreme Court, in its verdict in 2020 on Gas Infrastructure Development Cess (GIDC) recovery, had named North-South Gas Pipeline Project that it should be built by using the amount of GIDC, but the new leadership at Petroleum Division now wanted to build LNG-III pipeline with the amount of GIDC as an alternative plan.

The CCoE also asked the Petroleum Division to come up with a firm project proposal after one month’s time as the government did not afford any delay in building the infrastructure required to suck in more LNG in the country’s system. The country is facing a gas shortage and the required infrastructure is also needed to import more LNG. And to this effect, two LNG terminals – Enargas and Tabeer – have also managed the construction and capacity pipeline to have the financial closure.
Petroleum Division (PD) pitched in the CCoE meeting a pipeline proposal as a contingency plan from consortium of SSGC, SNGPL and PAPCO saying PD will also ensure participation of local companies in the EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction or EPC) and operations and maintenance (O&M) contracts, local manufacturing of pipeline, and maximum local technical and human resource contribution.
Under the proposal, the PD sought CCoE’s guidance on the three issues which include a) Policy directions on SHA (Share-holding Agreement) negotiations, project structure and financing arrangements; b) Firm commitment from Finance Division for advance release of GIDC instalments, commensurate with project expenditures; and c) Evolving understanding on contingency plan in case of deadlock with Russia.
The summary of the Petroleum Division also mentions that the Government of Pakistan and Government of Russian Federation signed the protocol on the amendments to the Inter-governmental Agreement (IGA) on the cooperation for the development of the PSGP project on May 28, 2021 in Moscow, Russia. The Protocol envisaged signing of a Share-holders Agreement (SHA) within 60 days from the signing of the Protocol (on July 27, 2021).
And to this effect, a draft on SHA approved by the Technical Committee, headed by the secretary petroleum was shared with the Russian Ministry of Energy on Dec 23, 2020 during the Second Meeting of the Russia Pakistan Joint Technical Committee on the project. In response, the Russian side proposed a “Heads of Terms” for SHA on March 17, 2021. The critical aspects of SHA which are also enumerated in the Heads of Terms which say that a) The Project will be implemented through a Special Purpose Company (SPC) to be incorporated in Islamabad, Pakistan; b) ISGS will have majority shareholding in the SPC (74%), while the Russian Nominated Entity will have up to 26% shares; and c) The Chairman of the Board and CEO of the Company will be nominated by ISGS, while the Project Head/Chief Technical Officer will be of Russian Nominated Entity (RNE).
3.This Division has received through MoFA a letter dated June 10, 2021 from N Shulginov, Minister of Energy of the Russian Federation. Through this correspondence, the Russian Ministry of Energy has informed that the Russian Nominated Entity for the Project has been incorporated as PAKSTREAM LLC (having registration number 1217700101211). The Russian side has written that they would like to commence negotiations on the appropriate agreements including banking instruments and commercial contracts, while indicating the readiness of representatives of PAKSTREAM LLC to arrive in Pakistan as soon as possible to do so.

The summary also says that at this point, key challenges to be addressed at the earliest include: local companies’ participation in EPC contract through local or international JV; GIDC component of financing deposited in Federal Account # 1; route alignment NOC by MoD (ministry of defence), land acquisition; completion of Project Feasibility - PPRA exemption under process for engagement of NESPAK; and alignment of completion of Project with COD of new LNG terminals.






Extremely disappointed with this development. A complete shitshow by new Petroleum Div leadership. I hope some sanity must prevail and Foreign Office, PMO must intervene and sort PD's (lack of) management, (in)competency, lack of planning and limited foresight.

Although, above ground storage is a welcome news, and much needed, but it will be wise to develop an onshore regasification terminal along with it. In absence of such a facility and reliance on leased FSRU units solely (which are manned and operated completely by foreigners) will be disastrous, a logistical nightmare and a folly of exponential proportion. It seems PD has learnt nothing from their dry-docking self made fiasco.

Since we are going to pay for jetty, loading arms, land acquisition costs, storage tank(s) infrastructure (Boil off gas (BOG) compressor, Cryo units, utilities etc), facility piping, transport pipelines from our own pockets (GIDC), why are we so shy to invest another $60-70m on boiler and vaporisor units and say, another 25m on land acquisition (for these additional facilities)? Instead of more FSRU based terminals, Pakistan should provide incentives to Tabeer, Energas, and Engro in terms of tax breaks similar to ones given to oil refiners, and we will not only have three onshore regasification terminals but also three to six storage tanks (180,000 cubic m each, usually a terminal is constructed with two storage tanks). Any sane government whose RLNG component of Energy mix is 20-25% would have chosen an asset of its own yesterday over any leased asset. This is a thousand fold blunder in making compared to Shahid Khaqan's PGPL terminal mess up.

@niaz sb, @ziaulislam @Patriot forever how do you see these developments? Frankly speaking, I had better hopes from IK led government.

One rents FSRU because of the shortage of investment capital and because the start up time is less than a land based terminal. Also for safety reasons, some town councils do not want a facility which could possibly explode.

Land based LNG regasification plants are multifunctional and more flexible. For example the jetty could be used for loading/unlading other goods after the LNG carrier has vacated it.

Replacing an FSRU with on shore plant would probably require additional investment in the range of $100-million but in the long term it would more than pay for the additional capital. A new FSRU costs close to $250-million and If one has that much capital available, IMHO it would be stupid not to go for a land based facility.

However, to be honest, the jury is still out on cost/benefits of renting FSRU versus land based facility. If I can raise additional capital, I would go for a land based facility every time.
 
Last edited:
.
Hammad Azhar

@Hammad_Azhar


After lengthy deliberations, Govt of Pakistan and Russia have agreed upon & signed 'Head of Terms' for construction of PakStream Gas Pipeline. Shareholding & corporate structure finalised. This project has been suffering from delays since 2015 but effective progress made today.



1626379584775.png
 
.
Byco sees doubling of gross refining margin by 2025

Kazim Alam
July 18, 2021


With a capacity of 155,000 barrels per day, Byco is the largest among the five refineries operating in Pakistan. — Photo courtesy Byco website


With a capacity of 155,000 barrels per day, Byco is the largest among the five refineries

operating in Pakistan. — Photo courtesy Byco website



KARACHI: The gross refining margin of Byco Petroleum — a vertically integrated energy firm with its own floating jetty, refinery and oil marketing arm — is expected to double from $3 per barrel to $6 once it completes the ongoing upgrade process by 2025, according to company chairman Mohammad Wasi Khan.

Speaking to a group of journalists at the company headquarters on Friday, Mr Khan said Byco is adding as many as 14 plants to its processing facilities, which will turn 90 per cent of the refinery’s output into value-added, high-margin products.

With a capacity of 155,000 barrels per day, Byco is the largest among the five refineries operating in Pakistan. However, it’s currently operating at 35-40pc of its capacity because the demand for its major output — furnace oil — has substantially gone down in recent years. The capacity utilisation levels are low across all refineries for the same reason.

Plans to add 14 more plants to produce high-end products


Annual demand for furnace oil now hovers around 2-2.5 million tonnes, down from 9m tonnes before 2017 when the country changed its fuel mix for power generation in favour of imported liquefied natural gas (LNG). The state-owned power purchaser stopped despatching furnace oil–based power plants, leaving refineries with a slate of products that have few buyers.

The share of furnace oil in power generation in 2020-21 remained 4.8pc against 3.4pc in 2019-20.

The extent of refining crude oil determines whether the output consists of heavier hydrocarbons (furnace oil) that have a lower profit margin or lighter hydrocarbons (petrol, diesel etc) that fetch higher market prices.

“Byco is the only refinery at the moment that is actively implementing its furnace oil upgrade project. We are putting up a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) plant, which is a secondary unit operation that produces additional gasoline,” he said, adding that furnace oil will be only 11pc of Byco’s entire output in 2025. The share of petrol will go up to 30pc and that of diesel will be 50pc. Other products like jet fuel and kerosene will constitute the rest of the product slate, he said.

The government is encouraging all refineries to start producing Euro V and VI fuels. “We’re adding 10-12 processing plants in addition to FCC and diesel hydro desulphurisation units. It’ll solve the issue of furnace oil (excess production),” he said, adding that the total upgrade cost will be $800m.

Mr Khan expects furnace oil–based power plants will soon be phased out entirely. The refinery will likely operate at full capacity by 2025, providing locally refined substitutes for imported petrol and diesel, he said.

But what if history repeats itself and petrol and diesel are largely replaced by cleaner fuels in coming years? After all, it was only in 2012 that Byco installed its second refinery of 120,000 barrels per day, which is the capacity that’s largely lying idle in the wake of dwindling demand for furnace oil. “Pakistan is one of those countries where electric vehicles haven’t penetrated the market. It’ll take some time,” he said.

Mr Khan added diesel isn’t going anywhere and neither is jet fuel. “A refinery should have the flexibility to start making petrochemicals if its gasoline demand goes down. Byco is doing exactly that. Our upgraded plants will have that provision. We’ll be able to convert them into making petrochemical feedstock,” he said.

The company made a net profit of Rs1.2bn in the quarter ending on March 31, up from a net loss of Rs2.8bn a year ago. Its capacity utilisation in the most recent fiscal year was just 30.8pc.

Mr Khan refused to comment on the upcoming refining policy. On the 2021-22 budget, he said the imposition of sales tax on the import of crude oil will create cash-flow problems for refineries. “We’ll adjust it at a later stage, but it’ll affect our credit cycle,” he said, noting that sales tax should ideally be imposed on raw materials in industries that are undocumented — which is not true in case of refineries.

He did not comment on market reports that Byco was planning to increase its overall refining capacity in tandem with the system upgrade.

He also refused to confirm or deny that his company was about to acquire Puma Energy, an oil marketing company with 542 retail pumps and a market share of 2pc.

The share price of Byco was Rs10.64 on July 16, up 19pc from a day ago.

Published in Dawn, July 18th, 2021
 
.
Panoramic View Of Attock Oil Company Khaur Oil Field, January 1938.

The Town Is The First Site Of Oilfield In Punjab Which Operated From 1911 To 1950's.

© Frederick Gardner Clapp / UWM Libraries

1626650283401.png
 
.
Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) of the cabinet presided by Finance Minister Shaukat Tareen has on Monday green-signaled the consortium of Pakistan’s leading petroleum exploration and development (E&P) for $400 million exploration attempt in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

“Petroleum Division regarding no objection certificate for issuance of the parent company guarantees/corporate guarantees by each of the consortium companies, on a joint and several bases, in favor of Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (Adnoc) and the Supreme Council for the Financial and Economic Affairs (SCFEA) to pursue international exploration and production opportunity in Abu Dhabi, UAE,” Dawn reported, quoting an official statement.

The said consortium of leading public sector E&P companies comprises Oil & Gas Development Company Ltd (OGDCL), Pakistan Petroleum Ltd (PPL), and Mari Petroleum Company Ltd (MPCL) along with Government Holdings Pvt Ltd (GHPL).

The four companies have formed a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) called NewCo with 25pc shares worth $100 million held by each over a period of five years in the UAE exploration block.

Besides a share of investment, the consortium is required to provide a parent company guarantee for all obligations for the NewCo under the definitive agreements to Abu Dhabi National Oil Company and Supreme Council for Finance and Economic Affairs (SCFEA).

The final approval will be awarded by the Supreme Council for Finance and Economic Affairs (SCFEA) of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.

The ECC decision would allow these four companies to issue guarantees to the SPV in favor of Adnoc and SCFEA to qualify for the exploration block for which the bid has already been submitted by the consortium, Dawn wrote.

The ECC around two years ago had allowed NewCo to use their initial investment out of their own resources to go for the Abu Dhabi exploration.

Moving forward to two months ago, the members of the consortium reported to PSX that each company would invest $100 million if the bid is successful, otherwise, the NewCo would be dissolved.

It is worth mentioning that Pakistan Petroleum Limited has expanded its exploration portfolio not only within but beyond Pakistan’s borders.

Dawn reported that that along with its partners, PPL had drilled 79 exploratory wells including a well in Iraq, adding 0.6 trillion cubic feet (TCFs) of gas to the company’s reserve base.

Read More: Pakistan ready to open new areas for oil and gas exploration

Based on existing data about the prospective wells from detailed petroleum system studies, seismic surveys, log files, and core samples from appraisal wells, estimates suggest these new blocks could hold multiple billion barrels of oil and multiple trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
Some of the blocks already have discoveries, and within the combined area there are 290 targeted reservoirs from 92 prospects and leads. In addition to the country’s conventional potential, one of the offered blocks is expected to contain significant resources.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom