Tameem
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2008
- Messages
- 4,468
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
Someone tell him the difference between criminal and civil prosecution. In criminal, yes its upto the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused party is guilty. In civil prosecution and under NAB Ordinance, NAB can ask any citizen to prove their assets are purchased through legal money if they feel the assets are beyond their stated income. The Sharif family has to prove that these flats were purchased with legal money, hence they produced this Qatari Letter.
First Fact
NAB can asks any citizen to prove. Therefore Sharif Family have to Prove.
Second Fact
Sharif Family did provides proves and Money trail like Gulf Steel Sale documents.
Third Fact
On GS NAB Accepts 75% Sale proceeds (21M Dirham) and refuse to accepts remaining 25% Sale (12M Dirham)
I thinks the bottom line will be either NAB have to accepts what Sharif Family provides or Rejects it under two conditions;
1. With Valid Rejection reasons everyone understands
2. Do Provides counter money trail
If NAB successful in providing valid rejection reasons then it will be easy to ascertain counter money trail.
If NAB didn't succeeds in providing valid rejection reasons (Which NS lawyer KH. Haris trying his best to proves atm) of Sharif Money trails then any punishment on any framework will be treated as "Intiqami karwayee" Publically (and that bold word is very important for future political discourse) , i thinks in next week or days, situation will be more clears.
Last edited: