No Hajj if Ram Temple not built, BJP leader to Indian Muslims

[Aasimkhan]

Dont tell us all this Bullshit. The Yazidi girl was killed due to apostasy. In Pakistan and other muslim countries there are apostasy laws which executes muslims who leaves islam so why the fuss? Also the Zoroastrians left Iran because you people didnt let them practice their religion abd spread your islamic ideology forcefully and had thousands of zoroastrians murdered. However the irony is that you call islam the religion of peace lol

Trust me if Islam was not the religion if peace we would have not left a single Hindu alive during 1000 years we ruled you, you are

 

[Buddhistforlife]

Trust me if Islam was not the religion if peace we would have not left a single Hindu alive during 1000 years we ruled you, you are

I am not even a Hindu so forget the dream of ever ruling us and also let me rectify that muslims never ruled India completely. It was the British who conquered the entire Indian subcontinent. Hindu kingdoms like the Vijaynagara empire, the Maratha empire, the kingdom of Tripura and etc other hindu kingdoms existed when Mughals and Delhi sultans were there in the subcontinent.

Trust me if Islam was not the religion if peace we would have not left a single Hindu alive during 1000 years we ruled you, you are

Also the reason why muslim kingdoms were able to defeat hindu kings very easily is because hindus were not united. Hindu kings were busy protecting their own kingdoms and because India didnt exist back then so a Gujarati hindu wont give a damn to what happened with a Rajput hindu. Even a Rajput back then would never marry a Gujarati although they both were hindus. However a united India would have been a nightmare for Mughals and so called brave Afghans. The Mughals tried to conquer Myanmar zillion times however they were defeated multiple times by moghs of Burma and so the Mughals could not expand their empire after Bengal. Aldo dont forget that the Mughal Prince Shah Shuja was beheaded by the burmese. This was only possible because the burmese were united not divided like hindus. So the wet dream of muslims conquering india are nothing more than a bullshut story.

 

[Hamza913]

Dont tell us all this Bullshit. The Yazidi girl was killed due to apostasy. In Pakistan and other muslim countries there are apostasy laws which executes muslims who leaves islam so why the fuss? Also the Zoroastrians left Iran because you people didnt let them practice their religion abd spread your islamic ideology forcefully and had thousands of zoroastrians murdered. However the irony is that you call islam the religion of peace lol

The fuss is that our fellow Muslim who did nothing wrong was killed mercilessly, I don't care why or how. Also, it had less to do with the conversion itself and more to do with the fact that she socialised with a Muslim, which goes to show how Yazidis view us.

Wrong, there is no evidence that it was spread forcefully or that innocent people were killed.

I've never called Islam a religion of peace. Our religion is not for pacifists, we recognise that sometimes violence is necessary to defend yourself.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Dont tell us all this Bullshit. The Yazidi girl was killed due to apostasy. In Pakistan and other muslim countries there are apostasy laws which executes muslims who leaves islam so why the fuss? Also the Zoroastrians left Iran because you people didnt let them practice their religion abd spread your islamic ideology forcefully and had thousands of zoroastrians murdered. However the irony is that you call islam the religion of peace lol

Off topic rant.

I am not even a Hindu so forget the dream of ever ruling us and also let me rectify that muslims never ruled India completely. It was the British who conquered the entire Indian subcontinent. Hindu kingdoms like the Vijaynagara empire, the Maratha empire, the kingdom of Tripura and etc other hindu kingdoms existed when Mughals and Delhi sultans were there in the subcontinent.


Also the reason why muslim kingdoms were able to defeat hindu kings very easily is because hindus were not united. Hindu kings were busy protecting their own kingdoms and because India didnt exist back then so a Gujarati hindu wont give a damn to what happened with a Rajput hindu. Even a Rajput back then would never marry a Gujarati although they both were hindus. However a united India would have been a nightmare for Mughals and so called brave Afghans. The Mughals tried to conquer Myanmar zillion times however they were defeated multiple times by moghs of Burma and so the Mughals could not expand their empire after Bengal. Aldo dont forget that the Mughal Prince Shah Shuja was beheaded by the burmese. This was only possible because the burmese were united not divided like hindus. So the wet dream of muslims conquering india are nothing more than a bullshut story.

None of you are ever Hindus. It’s your classic argument. I don’t buy it.

Also burma was never worth conquering, south india was more lucrative for the Mughals.

 

[HariPrasad]

“Secular” India

Yes. That is real secularism. Muslims can go to haj and Hindus can build temple win win situations

 

[KAMDEV]

I know all that but why are your Hindu Bhagats attacking Muslim minorities?

It will stop once things stabilize

 

[Buddhistforlife]

Off topic rant.



None of you are ever Hindus. It’s your classic argument. I don’t buy it.

Also burma was never worth conquering, south india was more lucrative for the Mughals.

What are you smoking? Myanmar became a poor state very recently due to the asshole military dictatorship. Before they were a prosperous nation and many Indians and Afghans used to go to Yangon for jobs and the Arakanese kingdoms used to employ many muslims in their courts.

Off topic rant.



None of you are ever Hindus. It’s your classic argument. I don’t buy it.

Also burma was never worth conquering, south india was more lucrative for the Mughals.[/QUOTE

The fuss is that our fellow Muslim who did nothing wrong was killed mercilessly, I don't care why or how. Also, it had less to do with the conversion itself and more to do with the fact that she socialised with a Muslim, which goes to show how Yazidis view us.

Wrong, there is no evidence that it was spread forcefully or that innocent people were killed.

I've never called Islam a religion of peace. Our religion is not for pacifists, we recognise that sometimes violence is necessary to defend yourself.

So what? If a Muslim girl socializes with a Hindu or a Christian boy will you guys not kill her or the boy? So whats wrong if yazidis do the same. And its pretty real. A hindu boy was killed by Muslims in India for befreinding a muslim woman.

The fuss is that our fellow Muslim who did nothing wrong was killed mercilessly, I don't care why or how. Also, it had less to do with the conversion itself and more to do with the fact that she socialised with a Muslim, which goes to show how Yazidis view us.

Wrong, there is no evidence that it was spread forcefully or that innocent people were killed.

I've never called Islam a religion of peace. Our religion is not for pacifists, we recognise that sometimes violence is necessary to defend yourself.

So what? Muslims kill their women for socializing with Hindu and Christian boys so what is wrong in Yazidis doing the same? Just recently a Hindu boy was murdered by muslims for loving a muslim girl. Dont be a hypocrite for gods sake.

 

[Hamza913]

So what? Muslims kill their women for socializing with Hindu and Christian boys so what is wrong in Yazidis doing the same? Just recently a Hindu boy was murdered by muslims for loving a muslim girl. Dont be a hypocrite for gods sake.

Wrong, most of us don't do such a thing because it's haram.

We're reasonable enough to just tell such people to p!ss off.

 

[Shahryar Isfahani]

Yes. That is real secularism. Muslims can go to haj and Hindus can build temple win win situations

The building of the temple itself is a huge controversy, history-wise, it comes at the cost of the ruthless destruction of the Shah Babur mosque by Hindu extremists. This mosque wasn’t just a place of worship, it was also a historical site of Indo-Perso Muslim culture dating back hundreds of years. It cannot be replaced by a temple as it would be an insult to the victims of the tragedy.

Whilst Hajj is a serious obligation of Islam that holds no controversy in any shape or form, it can’t be denied at any condition under a self-proclaimed secular regime.

 

[HariPrasad]

The building of the temple itself is a huge controversy, history-wise, it comes at the cost of the ruthless destruction of the Shah Babur mosque by Hindu extremists. This mosque wasn’t just a place of worship, it was also a historical site of Indo-Perso Muslim culture dating back hundreds of years. It cannot be replaced by a temple as it would be an insult to the victims of the tragedy.

Whilst Hajj is a serious obligation of Islam that holds no controversy in any shape or form, it can’t be denied at any condition under a self-proclaimed secular regime.

Mosque cannot be build by destroying the place of worship of others. You are a Muslim not believing in commandment of Allah.

 

[Shahryar Isfahani]

Mosque cannot be build by destroying the place of worship of others. You are a Muslim not believing in commandment of Allah.

I am Muslim and I know my religion so don’t ever try to school me on it. The commandment of Allah is to destroy the idols, these idols are nothing but man-made pieces of stones. These things have no superiority over humans.

@Pan-Islamic-Pakistan

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

The building of the temple itself is a huge controversy, history-wise, it comes at the cost of the ruthless destruction of the Shah Babur mosque by Hindu extremists. This mosque wasn’t just a place of worship, it was also a historical site of Indo-Perso Muslim culture dating back hundreds of years. It cannot be replaced by a temple as it would be an insult to the victims of the tragedy.

Whilst Hajj is a serious obligation of Islam that holds no controversy in any shape or form, it can’t be denied at any condition under a self-proclaimed secular regime.

100% truth brother. I'm glad you are familiar with this. Outside of Pakistan and India, many Muslims don't know about it.

Mosque cannot be build by destroying the place of worship of others. You are a Muslim not believing in commandment of Allah.

There was no temple there. The Hindus' proof is some saddhu (beggar priest) saw an idol in his dream in the masjid. Next day someone snuck in to put an idol there.

They also have joy in tearing down that masjid to insult Sultan Zahiruddin Babur, the first Mughal emperor (rahmat Allah alayh)

I am Muslim and I know my religion so don’t ever try to school me on it. The commandment of Allah is to destroy the idols, these idols are nothing but man-made pieces of stones. These things have no superiority over humans.

@Pan-Islamic-Pakistan

It is the sunnah of Prophet Ibrahim. Christians and Jews also are supposed to follow it.

However, we respected the Hindus' temples and did not enforce this law. Big mistake by us. They are the biggest backstabbers in the world. You can do good for them for a thousand years, and they will betray you for conspiracy theories like in Gujurat 2002.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

The building of the temple itself is a huge controversy, history-wise, it comes at the cost of the ruthless destruction of the Shah Babur mosque by Hindu extremists. This mosque wasn’t just a place of worship, it was also a historical site of Indo-Perso Muslim culture dating back hundreds of years. It cannot be replaced by a temple as it would be an insult to the victims of the tragedy.

Whilst Hajj is a serious obligation of Islam that holds no controversy in any shape or form, it can’t be denied at any condition under a self-proclaimed secular regime.

Babri mosque was constructed over a Hindu temple in Ayodhya. That temple was no ordinary temple and it was a pilgrimage site which relates to Lord Rama of Ayodhya. If you can destroy our pilgrimage sites then we can also stop muslims from doing pilgrimage. Tit for tat.

100% truth brother. I'm glad you are familiar with this. Outside of Pakistan and India, many Muslims don't know about it.



There was no temple there. The Hindus' proof is some saddhu (beggar priest) saw an idol in his dream in the masjid. Next day someone snuck in to put an idol there.

They also have joy in tearing down that masjid to insult Sultan Zahiruddin Babur, the first Mughal emperor (rahmat Allah alayh)



It is the sunnah of Prophet Ibrahim. Christians and Jews also are supposed to follow it.

However, we respected the Hindus' temples and did not enforce this law. Big mistake by us. They are the biggest backstabbers in the world. You can do good for them for a thousand years, and they will betray you for conspiracy theories like in Gujurat 2002.

You showed your real face? For you, killing hindus and destroying temples are halal and sunnah however if hindus retaliates by destroying mosque and targeting hindus then we are bad? You guys are the biggest hypocrite in this world. I wonder how come Pakistani hindus who are already a vulnerable community living amongst snakes and lunatics like you people.

 

[Aasimkhan]

B

I am not even a Hindu so forget the dream of ever ruling us and also let me rectify that muslims never ruled India completely. It was the British who conquered the entire Indian subcontinent. Hindu kingdoms like the Vijaynagara empire, the Maratha empire, the kingdom of Tripura and etc other hindu kingdoms existed when Mughals and Delhi sultans were there in the subcontinent.


Also the reason why muslim kingdoms were able to defeat hindu kings very easily is because hindus were not united. Hindu kings were busy protecting their own kingdoms and because India didnt exist back then so a Gujarati hindu wont give a damn to what happened with a Rajput hindu. Even a Rajput back then would never marry a Gujarati although they both were hindus. However a united India would have been a nightmare for Mughals and so called brave Afghans. The Mughals tried to conquer Myanmar zillion times however they were defeated multiple times by moghs of Burma and so the Mughals could not expand their empire after Bengal. Aldo dont forget that the Mughal Prince Shah Shuja was beheaded by the burmese. This was only possible because the burmese were united not divided like hindus. So the wet dream of muslims conquering india are nothing more than a bullshut story.

Burma was never part of sub continent or India so stop bragging about Burma's bravery. Muslims rule during Akbar and Shahjahan over India was complete, dont try to change the history. The only time india was united was under Chanadar Gupt Moria, never before or after that.

Babri mosque was constructed over a Hindu temple in Ayodhya. That temple was no ordinary temple and it was a pilgrimage site which relates to Lord Rama of Ayodhya. If you can destroy our pilgrimage sites then we can also stop muslims from doing pilgrimage. Tit for tat.

There is no historic proof a temple existed under babri mosque, its all RSS/BJP BS propaganda.

Babri mosque was constructed over a Hindu temple in Ayodhya. That temple was no ordinary temple and it was a pilgrimage site which relates to Lord Rama of Ayodhya. If you can destroy our pilgrimage sites then we can also stop muslims from doing pilgrimage. Tit for tat.


You showed your real face? For you, killing hindus and destroying temples are halal and sunnah however if hindus retaliates by destroying mosque and targeting hindus then we are bad? You guys are the biggest hypocrite in this world. I wonder how come Pakistani hindus who are already a vulnerable community living amongst snakes and lunatics like you people.

Pakistani Hindus are most prosperous and rich people in Pakistan. Who told you there is killing and destroying of temples? Are you drunk ?

 

[Buddhistforlife]

B

Burma was never part of sub continent or India so stop bragging about Burma's bravery. Muslims rule during Akbar and Shahjahan over India was complete, dont try to change the history. The only time india was united was under Chanadar Gupt Moria, never before or after that.


There is no historic proof a temple existed under babri mosque, its all RSS/BJP BS propaganda.

Who told you that? Read the history of Vijaynagara empire, Tripura empire and Maratha empire and also the Kingdom Nepal. These were some of the independent hindu kingdoms which existed besides the Mughals. Stop being ignorant.

B

Burma was never part of sub continent or India so stop bragging about Burma's bravery. Muslims rule during Akbar and Shahjahan over India was complete, dont try to change the history. The only time india was united was under Chanadar Gupt Moria, never before or after that.


There is no historic proof a temple existed under babri mosque, its all RSS/BJP BS propaganda.


Pakistani Hindus are most prosperous and rich people in Pakistan. Who told you there is killing and destroying of temples? Are you drunk ?

Pakistani Hindus are prosperous? Thats why hindus are not allowed to join the Pakistan army, Hindus are not allowed to renovate temples, Hindus are not allowed to hold prestigious government posts like Mayor or a MLA, There are no overwhelmingly rich Hindus in Pakistan. Tell me more lies.