What's new

Next war with opponents from Sangh pariwar will be different

Is Pakistan Army fully equiped and understand they are facing a different enemy in next war ?


  • Total voters
    82
  • Poll closed .
.
If what you say is remotely true than india would have attacked Pakistan with a full scale military assault after mumbai 2008 and URI last month. The fact that they couldn't is very telling despite the fact that Pakistan is at least 7x smaller than india and doesn't have abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems like india does.

Pakistan in all probability covertly has sufficient countermeasures to the Indian ABM system that they have not alluded to just like they didn't with our nuclear weapons program pre-May 1998.




Think you'll find many Indians especially on PDF are programed to believe india is a super power comparable to America, Russia & China.

The reason for avoiding a full blown war is known to even small kids.

Simple economics will reveal, 30 day war bill of an all out military assault will shatter economy of both countries. Neither side can afford it. Specially India, who's economy is outperforming Pakistan's.

As far as Pakistan fitting any countermeasures, the ABM is designed for countermeasures, and Pakistan on record is very concerned about Indian ABM in spite of any current countermeasures installed in their missiles.

No Indian thinks we are superpower compared to Russia or USA. But our aim is to be regional power in South Asia. As far as China is concerned they are ahead of us, but not so much that we're losing any sleep over it. Remember that nearly half a century has passed without a bullet being fired across our border with China from either side. There's a reason for that..

waste as much cash as you want .. end of the day we only need a few nukes to get through ..

they will get thorugh. india will retaliate. hence MAD senario. Hence no nuke war. war atleast for the next forseable future will be limited to IB,LOC and proxies.

unless something serious happens on the ground ie internal insurgency

ABM or no ABM nuclear war ain't happening.

Like nuclear weapons are a deterrent against conventional war.

ABM is a deterrent against nuclear war.

Please read my original posts right from the starting in this thread, to understand the difference between the two.
 
.
The reason for avoiding a full blown war is known to even small kids.

Simple economics will reveal, 30 day war bill of an all out military assault will shatter economy of both countries. Neither side can afford it. Specially India, who's economy is outperforming Pakistan's.

As far as Pakistan fitting any countermeasures, the ABM is designed for countermeasures, and Pakistan on record is very concerned about Indian ABM in spite of any current countermeasures installed in their missiles.

No Indian thinks we are superpower compared to Russia or USA. But our aim is to be regional power in South Asia. As far as China is concerned they are ahead of us, but not so much that we're losing any sleep over it. Remember that nearly half a century has passed without a bullet being fired across our border with China from either side. There's a reason for that..


Pakistan was also publicly concerned with India becoming a nuclear weapons state in 1974 but we overcame that obstacle. We shall with this one. You gave a partial reason why india cannot go to war with Pakistan. You should tell that to the millions of Indians always clamouring for it.
 
.
Pakistan was also publicly concerned with India becoming a nuclear weapons state in 1974 but we overcame that obstacle. We shall with this one. You gave a partial reason why india cannot go to war with Pakistan. You should tell that to the millions of Indians always clamouring for it.
OK Forget everything tell me why dint Musharraf used or say dared to use neuclear weapons in 1999 when soldiers of NLI were massacerred on ice hights of kargil drass and batalik ? even when pakistan had all the ballistic missiles and had conducted neuclear tests at chagai ?
 
.
Pakistan was also publicly concerned with India becoming a nuclear weapons state in 1974 but we overcame that obstacle. We shall with this one. You gave a partial reason why india cannot go to war with Pakistan. You should tell that to the millions of Indians always clamouring for it.

You would eventually need to join the ABM race for sure, but you won't be able to catch up. We get help for ABM from USA, Russia, Israel. You get help from China. In nuclear tech China is comparable to these countries. in ABM tech China is herself so far behind she won't be able to help you. Plus whenever you do it'll put a big financial strain on your economy which you'll not be able to afford. So you'll never be able to effectively catch up in ABM tech.

Regarding millions clamouring for war in India, what can I say, we are a 1.3 billion population, a few million are bound to be stupid. I'm sure you have plenty of those in Pakistan too. They don't have to fight on the front. That is why you'll always hear generals and politicians war monger, never the common soldiers who have to fight on the front.
 
.
OK Forget everything tell me why dint Musharraf used or say dared to use neuclear weapons in 1999 when soldiers of NLI were massacerred on ice hights of kargil drass and batalik ? even when pakistan had all the ballistic missiles and had conducted neuclear tests at chagai ?


There were plenty of Indian soldiers massacerred as well. You lot didn't use nukes either. Also in 1999, Pakistan was still in it's nuke weapons infancy and was very behind and disadvantaged militarily than what it is today.

You would eventually need to join the ABM race for sure, but you won't be able to catch up. We get help for ABM from USA, Russia, Israel. You get help from China. In nuclear tech China is comparable to these countries. in ABM tech China is herself so far behind she won't be able to help you. Plus whenever you do it'll put a big financial strain on your economy which you'll not be able to afford. So you'll never be able to effectively catch up in ABM tech.

Regarding millions clamouring for war in India, what can I say, we are a 1.3 billion population, a few million are bound to be stupid. I'm sure you have plenty of those in Pakistan too. They don't have to fight on the front. That is why you'll always hear generals and politicians war monger, never the common soldiers who have to fight on the front.


Lol.....That's EXACTLY WHAT indians said pre-May 1998 that Pakistan would NEVER EVER become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance as they themselves are behind. That was an EPIC FAIL. Just as then, so is now. As of early 2011, Pakistan has had the ability to produce Fusion bombs, H-bombs and thermonuclear weapons:

http://isis-online.org/isis-reports...g-nuclear-weapons-time-for-pakistan-to-rever/

Your post feels like deja-vu of the early to mid 1990s.
 
.
my friend weapons don't win war otherwise usa will win war in Afghanistan or in past it is man who win war India always got there 'a' kik by phatans. history proves it weapons do not win a true believer will win the war keep dreaming the last 4th war will be plus usa and others will sell you everything to get money it is just a business keep dreaming .in usa tv shows 53% Indian do not have bathrooms keep spending money on abm or whatever..
 
.
Lol.....That's EXACTLY WHAT indians said pre-May 1998 that Pakistan would NEVER EVER become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance as they themselves are behind. That was an EPIC FAIL. Just as then, so is now. As of early 2011, Pakistan has had the ability to produce Fusion bombs, H-bombs and thermonuclear weapons:

http://isis-online.org/isis-reports...g-nuclear-weapons-time-for-pakistan-to-rever/

Your post feels like deja-vu of the early to mid 1990s.

I don't know who said that Pakistan will not become a nuclear state even with China's help as China's nuclear capability was on par with the superpowers. Regarding ABM, no one will help you apart from China and their own ABM is much behind the superpowers, so they won't be able to help you catch up with India.

You can try and see, India has a public ABM program for a long time, whereas you haven't even started, all the best to Pakistan.. :-)

my friend weapons don't win war otherwise usa will win war in Afghanistan or in past it is man who win war India always got there 'a' kik by phatans. history proves it weapons do not win a true believer will win the war keep dreaming the last 4th war will be plus usa and others will sell you everything to get money it is just a business keep dreaming .in usa tv shows 53% Indian do not have bathrooms keep spending money on abm or whatever..

What does bathroom have to do with ABM?

Probably you're thinking ABM stands for Anti Bathroom Missile.. :-)
 
. .
There were plenty of Indian soldiers massacerred as well. You lot didn't use nukes either. Also in 1999, Pakistan was still in it's nuke weapons infancy and was very behind and disadvantaged militarily than what it is today.




Lol.....That's EXACTLY WHAT indians said pre-May 1998 that Pakistan would NEVER EVER become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance as they themselves are behind. That was an EPIC FAIL. Just as then, so is now. As of early 2011, Pakistan has had the ability to produce Fusion bombs, H-bombs and thermonuclear weapons:99

http://isis-online.org/isis-reports...g-nuclear-weapons-time-for-pakistan-to-rever/

Your post feels like deja-vu of the early to mid 1990s.
dont apply ur noora logik or this aayen baayen shaayen with me just tell me why dint musharraf used neuces as he threatenned in 1999 instead of deviating the topic

musharraf thaought he will get siachin and kashmir both with one stroke but your natiopn not only lost best friend USA to india but also the trust of so called kashmirir freedom fighters and there cause
 
.
I don't know who said that Pakistan will not become a nuclear state even with China's help as China's nuclear capability was on par with the superpowers. Regarding ABM, no one will help you apart from China and their own ABM is much behind the superpowers, so they won't be able to help you catch up with India.

You can try and see, India has a public ABM program for a long time, whereas you haven't even started, all the best to Pakistan.. :-)



What does bathroom have to do with ABM?

Probably you're thinking ABM stands for Anti Bathroom Missile.. :-)


The entire indian establishment were saying pre-May 1998 that Pakistan would NEVER EVER become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance. I remember it clearly. indians were so confident in this assertion that many prominent indian politicians, experts and military pundits suggested that india should "punish" Pakistan by launching a full scale nuclear assault on it. As Pakistan would not be able to fight back and it would permanently solve the "Pakistan problem". The indians were completely aghast and taken aback when Pakistan detonated it's nuclear devices. indians were completely caught of guard as what they thought was impossible become possible.

So when indians say that Pakistan can't do x, you or z it's very hard to believe and take them seriously.

Your assumptions about China are laughable. The Chinese have reached a stage whereby they are the ONLY other nation on earth that can 100% indigenously produce world class advanced weapons systems like the West and Russia does. Just because they have not PUBLICLY admitted to having an ABM system/program doesn't mean to say it doesn't exist. Just like when indians doubted pre-May 1998 that Pakistan did not have a nuclear weapons program.
 
.
Well in next war, the role of the people trained in RSS camps will be greater, as they are more interested in killing plundering and ofcourse raping.
In this scenario our civilian arm like some of the organizations who are more than willing to fight against India can play a major role, as they did in 1948. India understands that, and thats the reason why Indians are pushing their level best to cut our this arm , while maintaining their own, before final attack on Pakistan. Such groups from all around the world are our assets and we have to guard them by all means. We also should re-start NCC training.
Secondly we will be needing every type of technology rather than some key technologies. Joining NSG and MTCR will be a key in lifting embargoes from us, specially from USA. So, we need to do substantial work on this.
 
.
The entire indian establishment were saying pre-May 1998 that Pakistan would NEVER EVER become a nuclear weapons state with or without Chinese assistance. I remember it clearly. indians were so confident in this assertion that many prominent indian politicians, experts and military pundits suggested that india should "punish" Pakistan by launching a full scale nuclear assault on it. As Pakistan would not be able to fight back and it would permanently solve the "Pakistan problem". The indians were completely aghast and taken aback when Pakistan detonated it's nuclear devices. indians were completely caught of guard as what they thought was impossible become possible.

So when indians say that Pakistan can't do x, you or z it's very hard to believe and take them seriously.

Your assumptions about China are laughable. The Chinese have reached a stage whereby they are the ONLY other nation on earth that can 100% indigenously produce world class advanced weapons systems like the West and Russia does. Just because they have not PUBLICLY admitted to having an ABM system/program doesn't mean to say it doesn't exist. Just like when indians doubted pre-May 1998 that Pakistan did not have a nuclear weapons program.

Just like the Indians used to say that Pakistan won't last a week in 1947 and would be reintegrated back. And just like their mantra of failed state falling in hands of TTP (Indian sponsored scums). Every prediction of these hallucinating Hindus has not come true.

Btw, have Indians managed to develop Tactical Nuclear weapons yet?
 
. .
Just like the Indians used to say that Pakistan won't last a week in 1947 and would be reintegrated back. And just like their mantra of failed state falling in hands of TTP (Indian sponsored scums). Every prediction of these hallucinating Hindus has not come true.

Btw, have Indians managed to develop Tactical Nuclear weapons yet?

A big reason for that is the Congress rule for Majority of that period where they honored the deals with the British- Other political parties both the Socialists and Right Wing doesn't believe in the existence of Pakistan or honoring any deals made with the British-

India doesn't need tactical Nuclear weapons- although several tactical Nuclear devices were tested in 98 tests- one of which was based on Reactor grade plutonium- India could assemble over 2000 reactor grade tactical nuclear weapons by 2008-09-
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom