pakdefender
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2009
- Messages
- 5,671
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
and Islamabad will only discuss Indian-occupied Kashmir
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who rebelled against dogras kabotars or local volunteers and veterans of British Army from the regions that makeup Azad Kashmir?Who send tribes men into Kashmir to occupy Kashmir in 1947? kabutar ???
They are separate as per Pakistnis
That was quick! As I said a long time ago, Hindustan wants Pakistan dismembered. Commander coward tried to get a deal by selling us to the Hindustanis but they rejected it. Alarm bells start ringing in GHQ and realized what the HIndustanis really want, all these talks are for show to Christendom that they're ''civilized''.
Only the Ulima-Ikram can resolve the problem in Kashmir, Siachen, Water, etc. No one else!
Message to the secularists, liberals; anymore trash talk? You people don't know who you're dealing with, we do! And one more thing to you idiots, you keep talking about a ''limited'' war with Hindustan as if you have some kind of a playground fight you got set-up. The next war WILL be a full-scale war whether you want to believe it or not, it's going to happen.
Hindustan is being prepared for war from ALL Christendom countries, look at the nuclear deal, American fighter engine T-o-T, smart weapons, fighters, warships, anti-ballistic systems. They need gurantees from Christendom that they can stop our nukes and if they get that, then it's on.
Here is another news flash, we're NOT getting any Cobras, and yet they supplied them with Apaches. They have Poisidon and we got outdated junk P3-Orion.
WOW! A madrassa guy is teaching you OUR reality! Accept it or deny it, makes no difference.
Like i said, 2016 will be a tough year for us.
'If wishes were ancient Hindu inter-galactic spaceships, Modi would have one flying up his arse right now' ...India's representative to Pakistan said on Monday that his country was only prepared to discuss the part of Kashmir controlled by Islamabad in upcoming peace talks
Who rebelled against dogras kabotars or local volunteers and veterans of British Army from the regions that makeup Azad Kashmir?
We all know nothing can be achieved on Kashmir right away. If that is your stated policy then you already know the Pakistani state policy that Kashmiris should get their right to a plebiscite, on both side of the LOC.Whether we get somewhere or not will largely depend on what Pakistan thinks can be legitimately achieved in these talks. Pipe dreams are a no-no.
As far as the HC's statement goes, it is the Indian position & the possible reason for stating it as clearly is that the Pakistani HC in India is up to his old tricks. A reminder that two can play the game won't hurt
Got it, enemy is upon us, kado oyee bandukan.That was a quick! As I said a long time ago, Hindustan wants Pakistan dismembered. Commander coward tried to get a deal by selling us to the Hindustanis but they rejected it. Alarm bells start ringing in GHQ and realized what the HIndustanis really want, all these talks are for show to Christendom that they're ''civilized''.
Only the Ulima-Ikram can resolve the problem in Kashmir, Siachen, Water, etc. No one else!
Message to the secularists, liberals; anymore trash talk? You people don't know who you're dealing with, we do! And one more thing to you idiots, you keep talking about a ''limited'' war with Hindustan as if you have some kind of a playground fight you got set-up. The next war WILL be a full-scale war whether you want to believe it or not, it's going to happen.
Hindustan is being prepared for war from ALL Christendom countries, look at the nuclear deal, American fighter engine T-o-T, smart weapons.
Here is another news flash, we're NOT getting any Cobras, and yet they supplied them with Apaches. They have Poisidon and we got outdated junk P3-Orion.
WOW! A madrassa guy is teaching you OUR reality! Accept it or deny it, makes no difference.
Like i said, 2016 will be a tough year for us.
Even dialog over the status quo or a slightly changed version will involve discussing the territory under Indian control, so statements such as the ones made by the Indian Ambassador are correctly described as 'hurdles and setbacks' to India-Pakistan dialog' and serve only to inflame public sentiment which in turn results in less room for the respective governments to actually engage in substantive negotiations on dispute resolution.Peace can only happen around the status quo. Or some version slightly changed from it. Nothing more. Those who think India will give up territory, in Kashmir or elsewhere, are being seriously delusional. There is no point in saying that one wants peace but the price for peace is a part of someone else's house. Makes no sense.
and Islamabad will only discuss Indian-occupied Kashmir
'If wishes were ancient Hindu inter-galactic spaceships, Modi would have one flying up his arse right now' ...
The Indian government and/or its representatives can say what they want for public consumption, the discussion on Kashmir, if it occurs, will encompass Indian Occupied Kashmir as well, or there isn't going to be any 'India-Pakistan dialog'.
Talking about morality or we. Then India had no business in Junagadh and Hyderabad either, but you did interfere didn't you.There was no rebellion. Even if there was...Pakistan has no business interfering in it.
'If wishes were ancient Hindu inter-galactic spaceships, Modi would have one flying up his arse right now' ...
The Indian government and/or its representatives can say what they want for public consumption, the discussion on Kashmir, if it occurs, will encompass Indian Occupied Kashmir as well, or there isn't going to be any 'India-Pakistan dialog'.
By destroying Pakistan so the Indians can just waltz in to take over and 'resolve the disputes' right?Only the Ulima-Ikram can resolve the problem in Kashmir, Siachen, Water, etc. No one else!
That argument, from India at least, is invalid given India's forcible annexations of Junagadh, Munavadh (that had acceded to Pakistan) and later Hyderabad (whose ruler had not acceded to any country).There was no rebellion. Even if there was...Pakistan has no business interfering in it.
Talking about morality or we. Then India had no business in Junagadh and Hyderabad either, but you did interfere didn't you.
Even dialog over the status quo or a slightly changed version will involve discussing the territory under Indian control, so statements such as the ones made by the Indian Ambassador are correctly described as 'hurdles and setbacks' to India-Pakistan dialog' and serve only to inflame public sentiment which in turn results in less room for the respective governments to actually engage in substantive negotiations on dispute resolution.
So did someone put a gun to Modi's head to engage in talks with Pakistan?Sir, bringing religion into every discussion is the habit of every people from Pakistan? Coming to your last line of no talks between India-Pakistan, India have always maintained that stand, its the government of Islamic Republic of Pakistan that is hell bent on having talks with India.
Which involves discussing both parts of Kashmir, Indian and Pakistani controlled, as I pointed out.Not really. There will be no territorial concessions. What will be discussed if that is elements of the Musharraf-MMS formula which had discussions on additional autonomy & possible freer movement of people in both sides of Kashmir.
What was the Pakistan HC 'up to'?As far as inflaming public sentiments goes, maybe you should just read up on what the Pakistan HC has been up to. When the GoI was still making its position clear in parliament & having to deal with a very cynical public opinion. What's good for the goose must be so for the gander. Either a decision has been taken to allow these type of actions or the Indian side is responding to what it sees as an Pakistan attempt to create trouble.