salarsikander
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2013
- Messages
- 8,860
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Hi,epeat my arguments
Please your arguments conists of anything tat supports the fake existence of a country that is built on an invasion is fine anything less than that is termed as anti s emetic. You deliberately choose to ignore how Invaders have open air worst blockade in modern times, you choose to ignore how your kid, my god kids, are being brainwashed against other races
Hi,Yes, having UN monitoring damage caused by exploding heavy artillery rounds
is certainly something worth looking forward to - not.
Israel have the RIGHT to occupy the Golan Heights as long as there is a war.
It would be stupid of them to unilaterally withdraw without a guaranteed peace agreement.
They do not have the right to annex, but the difference in practice between annexation and occupation is small.
Nethanyahu is clearly not the right man to give up the Golan Heights - ever.
He is only however only one election away from being removed from power.
If Syria wants the Golan Heights back, they must make it attractive for Israeli voters not to re-elect Nethanyahu.
So far, they are doing nothing to further their goals.
Its not like they are being bombarded by Syria now and then, it was more or less 50 years ago, and No, invaders have no fking right to annex it. Syria is not at war with them. So this is the most lamest justification
Hi,epeat my arguments
Please your arguments conists of anything tat supports the fake existence of a country that is built on an invasion is fine anything less than that is termed as anti s emetic. You deliberately choose to ignore how Invaders have open air worst blockade in modern times, you choose to ignore how your kid, my god kids, are being brainwashed against other races
Hi,Yes, having UN monitoring damage caused by exploding heavy artillery rounds
is certainly something worth looking forward to - not.
Israel have the RIGHT to occupy the Golan Heights as long as there is a war.
It would be stupid of them to unilaterally withdraw without a guaranteed peace agreement.
They do not have the right to annex, but the difference in practice between annexation and occupation is small.
Nethanyahu is clearly not the right man to give up the Golan Heights - ever.
He is only however only one election away from being removed from power.
If Syria wants the Golan Heights back, they must make it attractive for Israeli voters not to re-elect Nethanyahu.
So far, they are doing nothing to further their goals.
Its not ike they are being bombarded by Syria now and then, it was more or less 50 years ago, and No still has no fking right to
Hi,You're not stupid. I think you're scared to repeat the arguments and points I bring to the discussion.
Scared ??? Please. I only state the truth. So do you know dent the open air prison that invaders have on palestine ?