What's new

Nawaz Sharif, 'very much Saudi Arabia's man' in Pakistan | Prince Al-waleed Bin Talal

.
1- If Nawaz Sharief is Saudi Arabia's man in Pakistan then why Saudi intelligence chief Muqrin bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud and a key Lebanese politician Saad Hariri came to Pakistan and revealed Nawaz - Musharraf 1999 Agreement
2- The National Command Authority is the apex civilian led command to oversees the employment, policy formulation, exercises, deployment, research and development, and operational command and control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenals not Nawaz Shahrief.

Pakistan 'ready to deliver nuclear weapons to Saudi Arabia'

pakistan-rocket_2726300b.jpg

A Pakistan-made Ghauri missile, which has a range of 1,500 kilometers (940 miles) and can carry 700 kilograms (1,540 pounds) of nuclear warheads Photo: AP

The founding father of Pakistan’s nuclear programme has dismissed reports that his country has reached a secret deal to provide Saudi Arabia with warheads in the event that Iran produces a bomb.

Rumours of a deal have long circulated in the Middle East, amid Saudi anxiety at its principal regional rival Iran developing a “Shia bomb”.

Citing American intelligence reports and a former Pakistani security officer, BBC Newsnight reported that nuclear weapons made in Pakistan for Saudi Arabia were ready for delivery.

But AQ Khan, who has admitted running a proliferation ring supplying secrets to Iran and Libya, said neither Pakistan nor Saudi Arabia had anything to gain – and a lot to lose by being ostracised by the international community and slapped with sanctions.

“Saudis may be ‘camel drivers’ but not idiots,” said Dr Khan, who remains a hero to many Pakistanis.

Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs also dismissed the allegations as "baseless", as did General Hamid Gul, a former head of the ISI intelligence service.

Saudi officials have long told their American allies that they planned to obtain atomic weapons if Iran went nuclear.

The latest reports suggests they could be ready even sooner.

Amos Yadlin, a former head of Israeli military intelligence, told a conference in Sweden last month that if Iran got the bomb, “the Saudis will not wait one month. They already paid for the bomb, they will go to Pakistan and bring what they need to bring”.

Pakistan declared itself as a nuclear armed state in 1998 with its first test.

It has never signed up non-proliferation agreements and has an expanding arsenal, with some estimates saying it has as many as 110 nuclear weapons with enough fissile material for more than 200.

The security of its warheads has long been of concern to the US, which has even developed plans to seize the weapons if it believed terrorists were closing on the country’s nuclear facilities.

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have longstanding ties and the Kingdom has financed a range of infrastructure projects, mosques and defence contracts.

Newsnight said a senior Pakistani, speaking on background terms, had confirmed the broad nature of the deal and said: “What did we think the Saudis were giving us all that money for? It wasn’t charity.”

Gary Samore, who served as President Barack Obama’s counter-proliferation adviser until earlier this year, also told Newsnight: “I do think that the Saudis believe they have some understanding with Pakistan, that in extremis they would have claim to acquire nuclear weapons from Pakistan.”

However, such a deal would have dire costs for both countries. An alternative might be for Pakistan to offer Saudi Arabia protection under its “nuclear umbrella”.

A recent report by the Centre for a New American Security, concluded that both countries would face huge problems with a proliferation deal, undermining ties with the US and jeopardising billions of dollars in assistance.

“Despite longstanding rumors suggesting the existence of a clandestine Saudi-Pakistani nuclear deal, there are profound security and economic disincentives cutting against Riyadh’s motivation to seek a bomb from Islamabad – as well as considerable, though typically ignored, strategic and economic reasons for Pakistan to avoid an illicit transfer,” it concluded.

Saudi Arabia seeking to obtain atomic bomb: Report
336591_Saudi-Shoura-Council%20.jpg


File photo shows a meeting of Saudi Arabia's Shoura Council

Saudi Arabia is reportedly trying to obtain atomic bombs as Iran and the west reach a deal over Tehran’s nuclear energy program.


Abdullah al-Askar, the chairman of the foreign affairs committee in Saudi Arabia's appointed Shoura Council, said he was worried after Iran and the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council -- the United States, China, Russia, France and Britain -- plus Germany sealed the deal, Reuters reported on Sunday.

“I am afraid Iran will give up something on to get something else from the big powers in terms of regional politics. And I'm worrying about giving Iran more space or a freer hand in the region,” he said.

Askar said that if the deal did not succeed in preventing Iran from what he claimed as building a bomb, Saudi Arabia and other countries would seek one, too.

Earlier in November, citing NATO sources, British media reports said that Saudi Arabia has invested in Pakistan’s nuclear weapons projects and believes it could obtain atomic bombs at will.

The reports said nuclear weapons made in Pakistan on behalf of Saudi Arabia are now sitting ready for delivery.

According to the reports, Riyadh has had the missile technology to deliver warheads since the late 1980s.

The British media reports also quoted former Israeli military intelligence chief, Amos Yadlin, as saying that the Saudis have already paid for the bomb.

“They will go to Pakistan and bring what they need to bring," he said at a conference in Sweden in October.

On November 24, Iran and six major world powers sealed an interim six-month deal in Geneva after intense negotiations to pave the way for a full resolution of the dispute on the Islamic Republic’s nuclear energy program.

Nawaz Sharif, the Saudi poodle with a nuclear button
461223.jpg


Nawaz Sharif, the Saudi poodle with a nuclear button
(Ahlul Bayt News Agency) - The Saudi support for Nawaz Sharif has been no secret in Pakistan or abroad. Politically speaking, it was General Zia who created Nawaz Sharif during the so-called Afghan Jihad in the 1980s. The Jihad was a Saudi-CIA war against the ‘infidel’ Soviet Union. It was the Pakistan Army headed by General Zia which was contracted by the Saudi-CIA combine to fight the Jihad. General Zia was himself a Deobandi who helped the Saudis launch the anti-Shia and anti-Brelvi Takfiri campaign in Pakistan, which has crushed the entire socio-cultural structure of the Pakistan society.

General Zia ruled the country for 11 years making sure that the Takfiri system he had installed would continue. For this purpose, the Deobandi madrassas (seminaries) were established to prepare hate-mongers and suicide bombers to carry out the Shia genocide. But the Deobandi mullahs and madrassas despite their venom and destructiveness were politically-electorally insignificant. They still are. Thus, the Saudi-Army nexus created a new political elite whose agenda was to win the votes of a society radicalized by Takfiri propaganda against the Shias, Brelvi Sufis, Hindus, Ahmadis, and Christians. Another part of the propaganda was demonizing and apostatizing of the likes of Benazir Bhutto and secular-progressive elements who had roots amongst the masses and could pose a danger to the Saudi Takfiri ideology.

This Saudi-Army complicity, its mechanism, and functioning is a long story, and cannot be covered in these spaces. The main issue here is the very person of Nawaz Sharif who has been acting more like a hatchet man of the Saudi Takfiri ideology than a Pakistani politician. The first Takfiri shot Nawaz Sharif fired after General Zia’s death was meant to destroy Benazir’s political career. He cried non-stop in every public and private forum: “She is a security risk!”

What was the meaning of calling her a security risk? It was not a political slogan at all, as some commentators have observed. It was the very first instance of apostatising of Benazir Bhutto done not by a mullah, but a politician. It meant this: Benazir must not be allowed to become prime minister of the Islamic Republic because she would give all nuclear secrets and other classified information to the infidel India. Within months of her assumption of the office of prime minister, Nawaz Sharif’s Takfiri slogan against Benazir found ‘evidence’ when she met Rajiv Gandhi in order to normalize relations with India. The rightwing Urdu press went hysterical with allegations that, inter alia, she had handed classified information to Gandhi. The ‘evidence’ discussed was that she had given the names of the Sikh militants who has been campaigning for an independent Khalistan.

Soon Benazir was sacked and Nawaz Sharif took over. Now it was his opportunity to show how loyal to the Saudis he was. In 1992, he introduced the notorious Blasphemy Bill in the parliament. The Bill stipulated death sentence for anyone who insulted the Prophet (PBUH). To this day, the people of Pakistan have been tasting the bitter fruit of the Bill. No meaningful discussion of the Bill was allowed, and within minutes it became a part of Pakistan’s constitution.

After he was sacked by General Musharraf in 1999, it was the Saudis who rescued Nawaz Sharif and housed him in a palace in Riyadh.

According to the agreement which Nawaz Sharif signed with the Musharraf government (and guaranteed by the Saudis), he would not enter Pakistan for 10 years nor run for a political office for the same period. But when in 2007 Benazir returned to Pakistan, the Saudis came into action and forced General Musharraf to let Nawaz Sharif return to Pakistan. This was in violation of the agreement, but the Saudis did not want her to win the elections. They sent their man to counter her. But Benazir was a genius. She convinced Nawaz Sharif to work for democracy while abjuring his inglorious past. For the first time in his political life, Nawaz Sharif made a sensible decision and joined Benazir against dictatorship. But Benazir was soon assassinated, and Nawaz Sharif was reclaimed by his handlers and paymasters.

And now, it is the same old Nawaz Sharif who has made alliances with Takfiri Deobandis who proudly kill Shias, Brelvi Sufis, Hindus, Ahmadis, and Christians. It is the same Takfiri Nawaz Sharif who has sided with the Deobandi killers against the Shias on the Rawalpindi tragedy in which Shias were shot and killed, and their imambargahs burnt down.

But the matters do not rest here. Nawaz Sharif seems to be going international in his service to the Saudis. Some of the highly reputed publications have claimed that Pakistan is ready to provide nuclear bombs to Saudi Arabia against Iran.

In an interview with Prince Talal of Saudi Arabia, the Wall Street Journal has observed, “If Iran does go nuclear, Saudi Arabia may not be far behind. It has options. Riyadh underwrote Pakistan’s atomic-bomb program and keeps the country’s economy afloat with its largess.”

To a question about how Saudi Arabia can go nuclear, Prince Talal said, “the arrangement with Pakistan is too strong. . . . Nawaz Sharif, specifically, is very much Saudi Arabia’s man in Pakistan”.

These words of Prince Talal, show how dangerous Nawaz Sharif to world peace is. Of course, he is not the only one. It is the Pakistan Army which is a mercenary organization and has sold nuclear secrets in the past for money. But it is through Nawaz Sharif, the “very much Saudi Arabia’s man in Pakistan” that the world might see a nuclear holocaust. Neither Nawaz Sharif nor any of his myriads of spokesmen has condemned Prince Talal’s reductive, in fact insulting, description of him. Because this is the true description of the man who is more loyal to the Saudis than to his own country. The world must take note of the dangers he and his Saudi masters pose.

arrow4ltr.gif
Nawaz Sharif, the Saudi poodle with a nuclear button


461223.jpg

(Ahlul Bayt News Agency) - The Saudi support for Nawaz Sharif has been no secret in Pakistan or abroad. Politically speaking, it was General Zia who created Nawaz Sharif during the so-called Afghan Jihad in the 1980s. The Jihad was a Saudi-CIA war against the ‘infidel’ Soviet Union. It was the Pakistan Army headed by General Zia which was contracted by the Saudi-CIA combine to fight the Jihad. General Zia was himself a Deobandi who helped the Saudis launch the anti-Shia and anti-Brelvi Takfiri campaign in Pakistan, which has crushed the entire socio-cultural structure of the Pakistan society.

General Zia ruled the country for 11 years making sure that the Takfiri system he had installed would continue. For this purpose, the Deobandi madrassas (seminaries) were established to prepare hate-mongers and suicide bombers to carry out the Shia genocide. But the Deobandi mullahs and madrassas despite their venom and destructiveness were politically-electorally insignificant. They still are. Thus, the Saudi-Army nexus created a new political elite whose agenda was to win the votes of a society radicalized by Takfiri propaganda against the Shias, Brelvi Sufis, Hindus, Ahmadis, and Christians. Another part of the propaganda was demonizing and apostatizing of the likes of Benazir Bhutto and secular-progressive elements who had roots amongst the masses and could pose a danger to the Saudi Takfiri ideology.

This Saudi-Army complicity, its mechanism, and functioning is a long story, and cannot be covered in these spaces. The main issue here is the very person of Nawaz Sharif who has been acting more like a hatchet man of the Saudi Takfiri ideology than a Pakistani politician. The first Takfiri shot Nawaz Sharif fired after General Zia’s death was meant to destroy Benazir’s political career. He cried non-stop in every public and private forum: “She is a security risk!”

What was the meaning of calling her a security risk? It was not a political slogan at all, as some commentators have observed. It was the very first instance of apostatising of Benazir Bhutto done not by a mullah, but a politician. It meant this: Benazir must not be allowed to become prime minister of the Islamic Republic because she would give all nuclear secrets and other classified information to the infidel India. Within months of her assumption of the office of prime minister, Nawaz Sharif’s Takfiri slogan against Benazir found ‘evidence’ when she met Rajiv Gandhi in order to normalize relations with India. The rightwing Urdu press went hysterical with allegations that, inter alia, she had handed classified information to Gandhi. The ‘evidence’ discussed was that she had given the names of the Sikh militants who has been campaigning for an independent Khalistan.

Soon Benazir was sacked and Nawaz Sharif took over. Now it was his opportunity to show how loyal to the Saudis he was. In 1992, he introduced the notorious Blasphemy Bill in the parliament. The Bill stipulated death sentence for anyone who insulted the Prophet (PBUH). To this day, the people of Pakistan have been tasting the bitter fruit of the Bill. No meaningful discussion of the Bill was allowed, and within minutes it became a part of Pakistan’s constitution.

After he was sacked by General Musharraf in 1999, it was the Saudis who rescued Nawaz Sharif and housed him in a palace in Riyadh.

According to the agreement which Nawaz Sharif signed with the Musharraf government (and guaranteed by the Saudis), he would not enter Pakistan for 10 years nor run for a political office for the same period. But when in 2007 Benazir returned to Pakistan, the Saudis came into action and forced General Musharraf to let Nawaz Sharif return to Pakistan. This was in violation of the agreement, but the Saudis did not want her to win the elections. They sent their man to counter her. But Benazir was a genius. She convinced Nawaz Sharif to work for democracy while abjuring his inglorious past. For the first time in his political life, Nawaz Sharif made a sensible decision and joined Benazir against dictatorship. But Benazir was soon assassinated, and Nawaz Sharif was reclaimed by his handlers and paymasters.

And now, it is the same old Nawaz Sharif who has made alliances with Takfiri Deobandis who proudly kill Shias, Brelvi Sufis, Hindus, Ahmadis, and Christians. It is the same Takfiri Nawaz Sharif who has sided with the Deobandi killers against the Shias on the Rawalpindi tragedy in which Shias were shot and killed, and their imambargahs burnt down.

But the matters do not rest here. Nawaz Sharif seems to be going international in his service to the Saudis. Some of the highly reputed publications have claimed that Pakistan is ready to provide nuclear bombs to Saudi Arabia against Iran.

In an interview with Prince Talal of Saudi Arabia, the Wall Street Journal has observed, “If Iran does go nuclear, Saudi Arabia may not be far behind. It has options. Riyadh underwrote Pakistan’s atomic-bomb program and keeps the country’s economy afloat with its largess.”

To a question about how Saudi Arabia can go nuclear, Prince Talal said, “the arrangement with Pakistan is too strong. . . . Nawaz Sharif, specifically, is very much Saudi Arabia’s man in Pakistan”.

These words of Prince Talal, show how dangerous Nawaz Sharif to world peace is. Of course, he is not the only one. It is the Pakistan Army which is a mercenary organization and has sold nuclear secrets in the past for money. But it is through Nawaz Sharif, the “very much Saudi Arabia’s man in Pakistan” that the world might see a nuclear holocaust. Neither Nawaz Sharif nor any of his myriads of spokesmen has condemned Prince Talal’s reductive, in fact insulting, description of him. Because this is the true description of the man who is more loyal to the Saudis than to his own country. The world must take note of the dangers he and his Saudi masters pose.
You are referring Iranian news agency and they are biased on Saudi matters
 
Last edited:
. .
The Nuclear Handshake
Is the Pakistan-Saudi weapons program for real?

BY SIMON HENDERSON | NOVEMBER 8, 2013

nuclear_9.jpg

BBC Newsnight, a British equivalent of ABC's 20/20, ran a story on Nov. 6 saying intelligence reports judged that Pakistan was ready to deliver nuclear weapons to Saudi Arabia. The purpose would be to counter Iran's perceived nuclear weapons program: "It is now possible that the Saudis might be able to deploy such devices more quickly than the Islamic republic [of Iran]," the report concluded.

The story ran the night before the next round of talks between international powers and Iran in Geneva. The implicit message was that Riyadh had a fallback option in case a deal is cut with the Islamic Republic that is not to its liking. Some may be skeptical about the report due to the denials of both nations and some vagueness about the source of these claims, but dismissing the report out of hand would be foolhardy: The outline of the Newsnight story has been circulating among Saudi watchers for several months as Riyadh's frustration with Washington over its Middle East policies have grown.

Although the latest information does not appear to have come from Saudi Arabia -- an unnamed "senior NATO decision-maker" was cited as the principal source -- any transfer of Pakistani warheads or missiles would fit neatly into the category of "ways the House of Saud could make things unpleasant for Washington."

Well before the uprisings of the so-called Arab Spring, King Abdullah regarded the threat of a nuclear Iran as a major destabilizing force. More than 10 years ago, the Guardian reported the kingdom was debating a strategy paper setting out three options: acquiring a nuclear capability of its own, maintaining or entering into an alliance with an existing nuclear power that would offer protection, or trying to reach a regional agreement on a nuclear-free Middle East.

In February 2012, a correspondent of the London Times was summoned to Riyadh, where he was told by an unnamed senior Saudi official that the kingdom could acquire nuclear warheads "within weeks" of Iran developing atomic weapons. In the event of a successful Iranian nuclear test, Riyadh would "immediately launch a twin track nuclear weapons program," according to the Saudi source, while warheads would be purchased "off the shelf" from abroad. At the same time, the kingdom would upgrade its planned civil nuclear program to include a military dimension.

President Barack Obama's administration will find it challenging to shrug off these stories as mere rumors. Among those interviewed by Newsnight was Gary Samore, until recently the National Security Council's WMD czar, who expressed his belief that the Saudis have an understanding "that, in extremis, they would have claim to acquire nuclear weapons from Pakistan." (Full disclosure: I was interviewed for the program and some of my sager comments were included in the film report.)

In a studio discussion thatimmediately followed the film, Sir William Patey, who was British ambassador in Riyadh from 2006 to 2010 and had previously been in charge of the Middle East department at the Foreign Office, did not contradict the report.

The collaboration between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan on Islamabad's nuclear program has deep roots that could go as far back as the early 1970s, when Saudi King Faisal agreed to fund what is now the main mosque in the Pakistani capital of Islamabad. Riyadh was almost certainly also tapped for funds by then Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto to pay for Pakistan's uranium enrichment program in the mid-1970s -- when the enrichment plant was revealed in 1979, diplomats and journalists in Islamabad saw the kingdom as one of the only likely sources of funds for such a project. The head of Pakistan's nuclear program, A.Q. Khan -- who was later condemned for proliferating nuclear technologyto Iran, Libya, and North Korea -- told me he visited the kingdom more than 40 times and was offered citizenship by one of King Abdullah's half-brothers.

Now, its payback time for Pakistan for the funding it got from Saudis and other Arabs for its nuclear program..
 
.
Alhamdullilah i am .
Zionist Najdi khawarij of modern time are these low life saudi who sold their soul to their master iblees to attack and destroy islam from inside .
and create doubt in muslim ummah their tasbeeh is shirk,haram and bidad.

Are you really an Indian?
 
.
Alhamdullilah i am .
Zionist Najdi khawarij of modern time are these low life saudi who sold their soul to their master iblees to attack and destroy islam from inside .
and create doubt in muslim ummah their tasbeeh is shirk,haram and bidad.

And how do you think they have done that? Its unfair to brand a whole nation as followers of Iblees and neither is it reasonable.
 
.
najd_1.gif

Imam Bukhari (Radiallhu Anhu) quotes this Hadith from Abdullah ibn Umar (Radiallhu Anhu) that the Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) once prayed for Syria (Shaam) and Yemen. It is narrated that there were some people of Najd also present in the gathering and they requested the Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) to make du'a for Najd also. The Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) continued saying: "O! Allah, Shower Blessings on Shaam and Yemen," The people of Najd again requested the Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) to offer prayers for Najd. The Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) said: "It is a place of tremor and Fitna (Mischief) and the horn of Shaitaan will rise from there." (Bukhari Shareef, Vol. ii, PP. 1050)

It can be deduced from the above Hadith that Najd is neither blessed nor a good place but one of Fitna and Evil. Najd has been deprived of the prayers of the Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) and therefore Najd has the seal of misery and misfortune and hoping for any good from there is going against the Will of Allah.

The Arabic word used in the above Hadith is Qarnush Shaitaan, which normally means the horn of Shaitaan. But the 'Misbahul Lughaat', a dictionary printed in Deoband has the following meaning: "One who follows the advice of Shaitaan." (Misbahul Lughaat, pp/663). Thus we learn that a Najdi/Wahhabi group will emerge, as pointed out by Rasoolullah (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) and this group will follow the advice of Shaitaan (Shaitaan refuses to respect Prophets and Saints, remember his refusal to bow to Hazrat Adam (Alayhi Salaam) is mentioned in the Quran. It will create havoc in the Muslim world. We are now witnessing the emergence of the Wahhabis who, with the assistance of petrodollars, are sweeping the Muslim world and are bribing them into accepting Wahhabism as the official version of Islam. Wahhabism is a disease but so many are misled into believing that it is curing the Ummah of Shirk, Kufr and Bidah. It is being portrayed as a revivalist movement. This is against the Ahadith. Looking at the geographical position of Najd, it lies to the East of Medina. The Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) pointed towards the East and said:
"There, that is the direction from where Fitna will emerge."

And how do you think they have done that? Its unfair to brand a whole nation as followers of Iblees and neither is it reasonable.
 
.
Saudi Arabia and Pakistan's 'Islamic Bomb'
March 03, 2010 02:30 IST

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's long-planned and much-delayed visit to Saudi Arabia has certainly contributed to strengthening of bilateral relations as well as to India's long-term energy security. As India's economic growth rate picks up, and given the uncertainties in the Gulf region, Saudi Arabia's assurances to keep oil supplies flowing and to invest in India's energy security must be welcomed. There has been some criticism in India about Indian diplomatic references to Saudi Arabia's potential role in improving India-Pakistan relations.

Whatever our domestic sensitivities, and however discouraging the past record of Saudi Arabia in the region, the fact is that the Saudis have enormous influence in Pakistan and can exert helpful pressure on the Pakistan army if they so wish. According to strategic policy analysts, Saudi Arabia funds up to 40 per cent of Pakistan's defence budget. Recall also the fact that when the late Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto dubbed Pakistan's nuclear weapons programme as the 'Islamic Bomb', his message was aimed at the one country he knew would fund it, namely Saudi Arabia. While Pakistan got its nuclear (warhead) technology from China, it got the funding from Saudi Arabia. The Uranium enrichment technology was stolen by AQK from his former employer URINCO of Belgium.

But, while China's strategists may view Pakistan as an 'all-weather' friend in keeping India off balance, the Saudis have other uses for Pakistan. Placed as they are between the undeclared nuclear capability of a Jewish Israel and a Shia Iran, Saudi Arabia's Sunni rulers may well view the Pakistan bomb as their own. This fact must be borne in mind in understanding the big power rivalry in Afghanistan and Central Asia. Along with the US and Russia, China, Iran and Saudi Arabia also have a strategic interest in the region. A 'new great game' is being played out in which India has a huge stake.
 
.
najd_1.gif

Imam Bukhari (Radiallhu Anhu) quotes this Hadith from Abdullah ibn Umar (Radiallhu Anhu) that the Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) once prayed for Syria (Shaam) and Yemen. It is narrated that there were some people of Najd also present in the gathering and they requested the Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) to make du'a for Najd also. The Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) continued saying: "O! Allah, Shower Blessings on Shaam and Yemen," The people of Najd again requested the Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) to offer prayers for Najd. The Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) said: "It is a place of tremor and Fitna (Mischief) and the horn of Shaitaan will rise from there." (Bukhari Shareef, Vol. ii, PP. 1050)

It can be deduced from the above Hadith that Najd is neither blessed nor a good place but one of Fitna and Evil. Najd has been deprived of the prayers of the Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) and therefore Najd has the seal of misery and misfortune and hoping for any good from there is going against the Will of Allah.

The Arabic word used in the above Hadith is Qarnush Shaitaan, which normally means the horn of Shaitaan. But the 'Misbahul Lughaat', a dictionary printed in Deoband has the following meaning: "One who follows the advice of Shaitaan." (Misbahul Lughaat, pp/663). Thus we learn that a Najdi/Wahhabi group will emerge, as pointed out by Rasoolullah (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) and this group will follow the advice of Shaitaan (Shaitaan refuses to respect Prophets and Saints, remember his refusal to bow to Hazrat Adam (Alayhi Salaam) is mentioned in the Quran. It will create havoc in the Muslim world. We are now witnessing the emergence of the Wahhabis who, with the assistance of petrodollars, are sweeping the Muslim world and are bribing them into accepting Wahhabism as the official version of Islam. Wahhabism is a disease but so many are misled into believing that it is curing the Ummah of Shirk, Kufr and Bidah. It is being portrayed as a revivalist movement. This is against the Ahadith. Looking at the geographical position of Najd, it lies to the East of Medina. The Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) pointed towards the East and said:
"There, that is the direction from where Fitna will emerge."

Yeah the Hadith refers to the places Syria and Yemen does it claim that Saudis are this and that or the inhabitants of any particular place are evil?? Listen i am not an Arabic speaking person but our Prophet PBUH was if you start cursing all Arabs it means you are unable to absorb his true message.
 
.
najad_one2.jpg
if you analysis the hadith the prophet is praying for syria and iraq but when the people of the Najd says the prophet to pray for them first he just ignore them and on insisting he say the following

It Is the place of tremor and fitna and horn of shaitaan will rise from there

Yeah the Hadith refers to the places Syria and Yemen does it claim that Saudis are this and that or the inhabitants of any particular place are evil?? Listen i am not an Arabic speaking person but our Prophet PBUH was if you start cursing all Arabs it means you are unable to absorb his true message.
 
.
View attachment 11000 if you analysis the hadith the prophet is praying for syria and iraq but when the people of the Najd says the prophet to pray for them first he just ignore them and on insisting he say the following

It Is the place of tremor and fitna and horn of shaitaan will rise from there

Why don't you think of it this way He knew the fitna would rise from there so he didn't pray for them it in no way shows that those people and by those people i mean all those who inhabit that land are evil. Come on we are all humans we all can interpret a Hadith but we can't claim all knowledge and there is always a strong likelihood of us being in the wrong in such cases. I don't agree with the stance of Saudi Arabia in a lot of issues and i say that outloud but to claim that all those who hail from there are necessarily evil is preposterous the rest Allah alone knows best.
 
.
Why don't you think of it this way He knew the fitna would rise from there so he didn't pray for them it in no way shows that those people and by those people i mean all those who inhabit that land are evil.
My dear it is one and the same thing.
 
.
My dear it is one and the same thing.

Why? It can be two different things the rising of fitna doesn't mean everybody there is involved in fitna and thus necessarily evil it means there are such elements there and i am not denying that.
 
.
Why? It can be two different things the rising of fitna doesn't mean everybody there is involved in fitna and thus necessarily evil it means there are such elements there and i am not denying that.
It is because to give fuel to fitna and for that you need a sizable amount of culprits. Minority cannot create that terror or commotion. for example, TTP cannot survive without the support of our political parties which hold nuisance value or for that matter criminals cannot operate with impunity without the support of politicians and police.
 
.
Alhamdullilah i am .
Zionist Najdi khawarij of modern time are these low life saudi who sold their soul to their master iblees to attack and destroy islam from inside .
and create doubt in muslim ummah their tasbeeh is shirk,haram and bidad.

Says the one who from Hindu-stan.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom