What's new

NATO versus SCO, which alliance is more powerful?

Which is more powerful?


  • Total voters
    71
Good point :enjoy:

Are India, Iran, Pakistan, Mongolia getting SCO memberships today or tomorrow? :coffee:
Not sure about that!! But one thing is for sure there is no secuirty pact between SCO allies unlike NATO allies.
 
.
NATO: 28 countries, total area 26.5 million square kilometers, population about 0.6 billion.

SCO: 6 countries, total area 30.2 million square kilometers, population about 1.6 billion.

NATO - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shanghai Cooperation Organisation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You forgot the main factor of strength: the GNP.

NATO: 32 trillion (2010)
SCO: 10.6 trillion (2012)

But anyway its totally useless thread.

P.S. NATO population is over 0.9 billion not 0.6.
 
.
You forgot the main factor of strength: the GNP.

NATO: 32 trillion (2010)
SCO: 10.6 trillion (2012)

But anyway its totally useless thread.

P.S. NATO population is over 0.9 billion not 0.6.


GNP means nothing. The US has more debt than its GNP.

Not sure about that!! But one thing is for sure there is no secuirty pact between SCO allies unlike NATO allies.


Security pact or not, doesn't seem to make any difference to me. SCO countries are friends and they have collective defense through UNSC.

P.S. NATO population is over 0.9 billion not 0.6.

Source? :coffee:
 
.
Security pact or not, doesn't seem to make any difference to me. SCO countries are friends and they have collective defense through UNSC.

All of members of the SCO (except China) were members of the USSR. I hope they are friends.

The big question is why are not ALL of the former Soviet Republics "friends".
 
.
All of members of the SCO (except China) were members of the USSR. I hope they are friends.

The big question is why are not ALL of the former Soviet Republics "friends".


The Russian speaking ones are friends. Belarus is because Belarus official language is Russian. Ukraine is not because Ukraine official language is Ukrainian. Baltics are not because their official languages are not Russian. Kazakhstan is because Kazakhstan official language is Russian.

Belarus is not yet a member of SCO, but it is a member of the new Eurasian Union and could join SCO during the next summit.
 
Last edited:
.
The Russian speaking ones are. Belarus is because Belarus official language is Russian. Ukraine is not because Ukraine official language is Ukrainian. Baltics are not because their official languages are not Russian. Kazakhstan is because Kazakhstan official language is Russian.

Actually, Russian is the primary language spoken in Belarus and Kazakhstan.

So the 7 other countries of the former USSR that are not part of the SCO are just easy writeoffs because they don't natively speak Russian? How does Chinese fit into this logic?
 
.
So the 7 other countries of the former USSR that are not part of the SCO are just easy writeoffs because they don't natively speak Russian? How does Chinese fit into this logic?


Pretty much. China and Russia are 2 of the top 3 superpowers. Since they are neighbors, might as well be friends :enjoy:

Heck, China + Russia are bigger than NATO in terms of area.
 
.
That's right man. Turkey is a NATO country. Should buy from another NATO country :yes4: Else China might one day sanction Turkey :o:

What's Spearhead force? :coffee:

It's a decision taken at Wales summit mate. Deployment of a high readiness force at the Russian borderlines with NATO members.

I dont think that one day China can sanction Turkey. But I surely agree that it'll surpass EU and America at near future.
 
. . . . .
I would go for the NATO, because nato is a Military Alliance + Team USA lol
2013-defense-budgets-top-20.jpg

The USA spent 2.7 times more than China and Russia combined
 
.
What is the road block for SCO becoming a military alliance ? Multi-polar world is much better for humanity than an unipolar one.
I am also of the opinion more nations should be incuded as permanent member in the UN.
Japan representing Asia-Pacific
Turkey - Mid East & North Africa
Nigeria (or any other country Africa selects) representing sub-saharan Africa
Brazil - South & Central America

Balance of power is key to STOP endless wars !
 
.
What is the road block for SCO becoming a military alliance ? Multi-polar world is much better for humanity than an unipolar one.
I am also of the opinion more nations should be incuded as permanent member in the UN.
Japan representing Asia-Pacific
Turkey - Mid East & North Africa
Nigeria (or any other country Africa selects) representing sub-saharan Africa
Brazil - South & Central America

Balance of power is key to STOP endless wars !

And why would Turkey represent the Middle East & North Africa? Apart from ottoman rule/ religion in some areas, Turks have nothing in common with those people. How can Turkey represent Iran for instance, and how is that fair?
Same with Brasil. You will let the only Portuguese country in America represent all the Spanish countries?
The world is not that united as you would like to see.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom