What's new

Naswarville

Status
Not open for further replies.
. . .
No you dodo, it has NOTHING to do with just Sikhs, as in, there are many non-Sikh Punjabis and they are very much a distinct ethnicity (Punjabi) and have the same language AND dominate the region of Punjab.

Thats why I said 'even for Hindus......' ! Bakiii Muslim Punjabis were different than you guys even Pre-Partition !
 
.
no cuz we hav our own probs to deal wid like u n @p(-)0ENiX always stress on not pokin our nose if something happens in syria or iran or somewhere cuz thats shudnt be our priority so then why nw?:confused:

listen dude...first bring ur own house in order....wth we hav done wid it...? we r going down everyday....first make us strong then fight for others .....then play jihad jihad for rest of muslim countries.o_O

this is wht u n @p(-)0ENiX been teachin me here on these issues...then y da different view nw?:p

then have same thoughts for syria n othr countries.....afta all kashmir too yet to be declared an independent state or part of pakistan...its still part of other country...u believe it or not....:p

cant kick u out cuz u n @p(-)0ENiX do no kashmiris:p

hw direct effect on us n or u? o_O will u be havin effect in gettin less kashmiri cheay (tea) or kashmiri shawls if it remins wid india haha

Yes, Pakistan does need to get its own house in order first before focusing on anything else. That remains true because we need to solve all sorts of issues ranging from corruption to extremism. The difference between Syria, Iran & Kashmir is that both Syria & Iran are sovereign countries & they can solve their issues on their own. Syria is also part of the Arab world, & Arab countries are offering them their support. Although, helping any country out with humanitarian assistance isn't a problem at all. Syrians & Iranians share religious ties with us, although the Iranians share the Indo-Iranian heritage with us too even though they have their own civilizations & past. Kashmir is our business not just because there are Pakistani Kashmiris, but the region itself is disputed & part of Kashmir is under our control. The Kashmiris themselves share the Indo-Iranian heritage with other ethnic groups of the north western regions of the Sub-Continent.A Kashmiri is far closer to you than a Syrian is if you take other factors apart from religion in to consideration.

their ancestor's lang

Ancestral language? Do you mean Sanskrit & Avestan? Sanskrit belonging to the Indo-Aryans & Avestan belonging to the Iranic people, both of them are sister languages too.
 
.
Thats why I said 'even for Hindus......' ! Bakiii Muslim Punjabis were different than you guys even Pre-Partition !

That's because that branch of the ethnicity is mixed now and purely based on their residence in the Pakistani province of Punjab.
 
. .
Last edited:
.
I know Perfection is indeed Untouchable ! :cool:



Shakal deekhiii haii @marshmallo kiii - She can't even speak Punjabi despite being a Punjabi aur mujheee lecture kar raheiii haii ! :p
Not in that way, as in literally you are inferior even the lowest of the castes and fit to be used as an animal- truly a bestial idea.
 
.
Yes, Pakistan does need to get its own house in order first before focusing on anything else. That remains true because we need to solve all sorts of issues ranging from corruption to extremism. The difference between Syria, Iran & Kashmir is that both Syria & Iran are sovereign countries & they can solve their issues on their own. Syria is also part of the Arab world, & Arab countries are offering them their support. Although, helping any country out with humanitarian assistance isn't a problem at all. Syrians & Iranians share religious ties with us, although the Iranians share the Indo-Iranian heritage with us too even though they have their own civilizations & past. Kashmir is our business not just because there are Pakistani Kashmiris, but the region itself is disputed & part of Kashmir is under our control. The Kashmiris themselves share the Indo-Iranian heritage with other ethnic groups of the north western regions of the Sub-Continent.A Kashmiri is far closer to you than a Syrian is if you take other factors apart from religion in to consideration.



Ancestral language? Do you mean Sanskrit & Avestan? Sanskrit belonging to the Indo-Aryans & Avestan belonging to the Iranic people, both of them are sister languages too.

han wae wae.....skirt n jeans n avast anti virus:p lol
sorry dun kno much abt these langs.....
 
.
That's because that branch of the ethnicity is mixed now and purely based on their residence in the Pakistani province of Punjab.

On the contrary the Ethnicity never had nationalistic overtones throughout History - You forget barring Ranjit Singh, Punjab, hasn't really produced any other Leader of note ! Too bad he was an absolute arse to Muslim Punjabis.
 
.
those who talk,walk n stalk like kashmiries haha
smoking-smiley-face.gif
jk

atleast thy shud kno their lang!! the kashmiries in pak dun kno if their grand parents, both of thm were frm kashmir or not or maybe any one of thm were problaly from sudan or russia but they forcefully wud say their ancestors were from kashmir....

dare they had their ancestors from any african country,i wud see if they still be proudly associating thm wid that land....or showing off all da time like da kashmiries here do!:p

Haha! There are Pakistanis belonging to other ethnic groups that don't speak their ethnic languages when they are raised abroad. Do they no longer belong to their ethnicities? :p
 
.
Not in that way, as in literally you are inferior even the lowest of the castes and fit to be used as an animal- truly a bestial idea.

I wouldn't mind being used as a bestial thing by a certain lady that goes by the name of Nandita ! ;)
 
.
On the contrary the Ethnicity never had nationalistic overtones throughout History - You forget barring Ranjit Singh, Punjab, hasn't really produced any other Leader of note ! Too bad he was an absolute arse to Muslim Punjabis.

Apart from Jinnah you folks haven't produced an actual people's leader whatsoever, and Ranjit Singh was a king- got NO respect for monarchs- they didn't build themselves- hell even Stalin is a better pick than any King who EVER ruled.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom