What's new

Mush solution for Baloch separatists

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
Sawal Yeh Hai – 11th September 2009

Danish: Should the solution for Balochistan be political or military?

Mush: Both, it should be combination of force and politics. Listen, if there are some people who are saying that they do not want to live with Pakistan and want to get separated and do not believe in Pakistan, then what should be done with those people. Do you want to hug them? It is obvious we will have to fight such people and we will have to defeat them, whatever it takes. Nobody should have the nerves to say that they are not on Pakistan's side. If they are not on Pakistan's side, they can leave Pakistan and live elsewhere. We can not show any leniency for such people.

I like this solution. I wonder if Mush will mind, if India applies the same solution on Kashmir separatists.

The only purpose of this thread was for the thread starter to make the statement in bold, and bait Pakistanis, which has been thoroughly negated. In fact, these arguments against equating Baluchistan and Kashmir have been made time and again, including with MTG, which leads me to believe that the only purpose of this thread was to bait Pakistanis.

Other than that, the point made by Musharraf is pretty logical and practical - that the government make peace with those willing to make peace, and act with force against those refusing a path of peaceful protest to achieve their goals. Add in the suggestions to increasing development funds and autonomy to win over the local populace, and it is a winning formula provided it is properly implemented at all levels.

MilesToGo banned for a month for baiting and trolling - this is not his first warning and not his first ban.

Thread closed.


The discussion on Baluchistan and ways to end the insurgency are ongoing on the Baluchistan sticky and other threads -please continue this discussion, without the flawed Kashmir angle, there please.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom