Hell hound
STAFF
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2014
- Messages
- 4,168
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
we were strong because our laws at that time was new and modern but as the time passed we didn't review them and then slowly started our journey toward radicalization and now here we are.Sure, that would be ideal, but my point is that the laws can be changed and reformed even while retaining the 'Islamic nature' of the State in the short to medium term IF the Mullahs are asked to justify their interpretations in court.
At the root of the whole thing is the 'Blasphemy Law' - this law is essentially the Mullah's weapon to stifle all dissent, debate and criticism of their regressive interpretations of Islam that they have peddled to the masses and used to destroy Muslim societies and nations over the past several centuries. At one point the Islamic world led or rivaled the rest of the world in scientific discovery, the arts and development - and then came Mullah power and their clampdown on free thought and speech under the guise of 'blasphemy'. And now the Islamic world is at the level of the Medieval ages when Christian priests were burning people alive for 'blasphemy' and shutting down free speech, and scientific discovery and research.
i don't know who thought that introducing blasphemy law was a great idea it gave those fanatic mullahs almost absolute unchecked power they can blame anyone with almost zero evidence and now it is impossible for us to repeal the law without extreme backlash.even then the feasible option that i can see is use the stick and snatch this law from them start the subtle process of state and religion.otherwise we will never be able to change our public view point and will remain this outdated civilization.but then again its only my view point other may no agree with it.