livingdead
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2011
- Messages
- 22,952
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Homeopaths and quacks should not be allowed to call themselves doctor. Same for ayurveda, call them ayurvedic practitioner.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Homeopaths and quacks should not be allowed to call themselves doctor. Same for ayurveda, call them ayurvedic practitioner.
They are not doing it....the state thsemselves calls them doctors after they pass BHMS or BAMS degree.
Homeopaths and quacks should not be allowed to call themselves doctor. Same for ayurveda, call them ayurvedic practitioner.
What nonsense ............by that same absurd logic, people who finished their Phd should also not be called doctors
Where does it say that ONLY people who practice 'Allopathy' can be called doctors.............anybody who practices the art of healing is a doctor. Doctor is a generic term that is used for healers. Even dentists are called doctors.
India is the mother of medicine and to imagine an absurd scenario where only doctor's trained in the western model can be called doctor is a laughable suggestion. India is a place where there are multiple alternative healing methods.
Thankfully such foolish suggestions are limited to a fringe minority in India
Why do you insist on calling yourself 'Hindu guy' ........ you are an embarrassment to hindus. Just goes to show stupidity is not limited by religion.
you seem to be terribly offended... these people can do whatever they want, calling themselves a doctor gives them certain respectability which they dont deserve.
A doctor spends 5 years to study medicine and only then can practice. Any doctor will confirm its hard work.
And you want to equate them to guys who sell white color sweet... he he
Alternative my foot, they are all cheating gullible people.
Where does it say that ONLY people who practice 'Allopathy' can be called doctors.............anybody who practices the art of healing is a doctor. Doctor is a generic term that is used for healers. Even dentists are called doctors.
India is the mother of medicine and to imagine an absurd scenario where only doctor's trained in the western model can be called doctor is a laughable suggestion. India is a place where there are multiple alternative healing methods.
Yeah but you have to realise that almost all those who supposedly specialised in alternate methods insist on being allowed to prescribe allopathic drugs, something that they have not trained for. The point s not whether or not these people can be called "doctors", it is to let the patients know exactly what the "doctor" is trained as. Most people have no idea of the differentiations between BAMS & MBBS. Why should the patient not have the right to know exactly what type of doctor is treating them and make a more informed choice? Surely, no one will allow someone with a Phd in unrelated fields to treat patients simply because he can be called a doctor? Why should it be any different with these practitioners of alternate medicine? Why should they be hiding what exactly is their qualification & what they have been trained in & more specifically what they have not been trained in?
I would rather consult the guy in drug store than a practitioner of alternative medicine.. at least the guy has been selling medicine every day will have some idea for minor illness... what will the ayurvedic and homeopathic guy know about it such drugs ?For 99.9% of India, 'choice' is a luxury.
They don't get to 'choose' their doctor based on 'informed decision'. Most just go to whoever is available or whoever they can afford.
If you are talking about the 0.1% then they would not go to a quack anyway.
Availability of a healer, qualified or not is itself a great deal.
In India medical stores are the first line in healthcare. They are the one's treating ailements. People go to doctors if the local medical store cannot treat them. Most drugs are available over the counter without a prescription. In India where human life is cheap the drug store save more lives than kill.
Practitioner of alternative medicine do not claim to be qualified Allopathy doctors ..........No one bothers to ask them anyway. How many times have you as part of the 0.1% elite have asked your doctor to show you his Medical certificate ?
There is a huge gap between 'Theory' and 'Practical'. Its the difference been being a grown up and an idealistic kid.
For 99.9% of India, 'choice' is a luxury.
They don't get to 'choose' their doctor based on 'informed decision'. Most just go to whoever is available or whoever they can afford.
If you are talking about the 0.1% then they would not go to a quack anyway.
Availability of a healer, qualified or not is itself a great deal.
In India medical stores are the first line in healthcare. They are the one's treating ailements. People go to doctors if the local medical store cannot treat them. Most drugs are available over the counter without a prescription. In India where human life is cheap the drug store save more lives than kill.
Practitioner of alternative medicine do not claim to be qualified Allopathy doctors ..........No one bothers to ask them anyway. How many times have you as part of the 0.1% elite have asked your doctor to show you his Medical certificate ?
There is a huge gap between 'Theory' and 'Practical'. Its the difference been being a grown up and an idealistic kid.
I would rather consult the guy in drug store than a practitioner of alternative medicine.. at least the guy has been selling medicine every day will have some idea for minor illness... what will the ayurvedic and homeopathic guy know about it such drugs ?
I would rather consult the guy in drug store than a practitioner of alternative medicine.. at least the guy has been selling medicine every day will have some idea for minor illness... what will the ayurvedic and homeopathic guy know about it such drugs ?