That's what you think. Ask an Indian (and there are more of us than You), and Jinnah could be worse than a mad dog. But nothing to be achieved by calling Jinnah a mad dog or even implying that he was a mad dog. Hence my comment about trying to stay away from calling Jinnah (or Modi) a mad dog, irrespective of your personal feelings.
Yes. They live in the stupid delusions that by abusing an Indian Prime minister, they are achieving something.
---
i know ....
having opinion is one thing and making it as atttiude is another
modi have controversial past .. accepted
tagging him all bad adjective when highest court of india cleared it.. SC resect by all indian above all ......so that name calling is either childish or satisfiying ego of few who cant see beyond the bend ..
or they just dont understand what indepdant judicary is all about.
---
Protest is our right when somthg worng is hapnig..
taking action on same is their right and responsibilty...
seems Responsibility is repalce by resistance in this case
--------------------------------
Reminder - 1
-------------
1. Mao
if same thing happened .. i apologize behalf of my fellow indians
if that is so.. please write to MOD to add in Policy that inclduing gandhi and jinnah MAO also be in same list ...
@
Horus @
Chak Bamu @
Oscar@
WebMaster
Can we add
Mao Zedong in list of father of nation which should not be abuse / degraded
2. Head of state ..
Please be clear on calling, naming Head of state ..
i wrote it last time also but either ignored or decision awaited.
Respect is dered to Head of state ..
Same happens in Human / civil society..
having opinion is one thing .. you have right to have it
but
no right to abuse .. seems this is given free hand on same issue
Mods are culprit too in this.. sorry that a sad fact
these issue
setting bad precedent for PDF ..
Reminder - 1
----------------
--
@
Chak Bamu @
Oscar @
Fulcrum15@
WebMaster
i know its usless to call mod for this as i did many times but no result...
1.Calling PM of India as Terrorist /Mass murder..
Court Clears Narendra Modi in Riots Case - India Real Time - WSJ
The attacks on Muslims exploded across Gujarat after around 60 people were killed when a train carrying Hindu activists was set on fire near the town of Godhra.
A Supreme Court-monitored Special Investigation Team in 2012 said it found no evidence that Mr. Modi had any role in the state-wide killings
Please See BOLD part that indian SC cleared him when themselves were monitoring probe.. enough said..
you may have perosnal opinion about modi .. fine but as ADMINISTRATOR calling head of nation terrorist is right?
on what basis PDF Management alllowed to call indian PM terorist..
1. is he decalred Terrorist / Muderd in indian couert .. NO
2. is he decalred Terrorist / Muderd in international couert ..NO
3. is he tried in Int court of jutice for genocide .. NO
US Court summon
yes.. he was summmon but for why ...
New York has issued summons against the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his
alleged role in presiding over the anti-Muslim pogrom in Gujarat during 2002 when he was Chief Minister of the state.
US court issues summons against Modi - The Hindu
So its Alleged not proven,,
as per Law of natural jusice..
Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence
Right to be Considered Innocent until Proven Guilty
---
Then how and What paramet PDF Managet allowd calling him those adjective..
----
Silence of Mod
You have right to remain silent but not at cost of Truth and Duty...
its you Duty to stand by on side of Truth based on Facts and Data .and logic...
--
I rest my case here...
Jinnah great leader, modi mad dog. There fixed it.
--
let MOD reply on their stance they i will reply with all
species