Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But who decides on these rights?
As stated earlier, We have to stop our descent down the slippery slope. You are advocating Tyranny of the Majority ...
For example, India is a Hindu majority country. If tomorrow the Hindu majority decides that all Indian Muslims should be forced to convert or alternatively expelled from India, by your logic, their demand will be fully justified as Hindus are in absolute majority in India
Be careful what you wish for
Politicology of Religion is a discipline of Political Science. Political discussions aren't banned.
I thought Allama Iqbal also had a part in the idea of a Muslim homeland...."A man may die, nations may rise and fall, but an idea lives on .."
The idea of Pakistan was the brainchild of Jinnah. Jinnah has died but his idea is immortal.
No one worships Jinnah. What are you on about ?
Then you shouldn't be labelling those Muslims as Seculars who disagree with your interpretation/understanding of Islam .. No ?
Ahmadis who can afford should leave Pakistan. Once Pakistan is fully 100% pure Sunni then they can reach the Nirvana.
Cute
Where is the source for this quote? I have only been able to locate someones twitter for this.You of course are entitled to your opinion. I agree with Jinnah Sahib
"Ahmadis are Muslims if they say they are Muslims & NO ONE, not even the sovereign legislature has the right to say otherwise." - Jinnah (May 5, 1944)
Where is the source for this quote? I have only been able to locate someones twitter for this.
So where does it say "...not even the sovereign legislature has the right to say otherwise."?Tahrik Huriyyat Kashmir (History of Independence Movements in Kashmir), volume 2, 1936 - 1945, page 291)
https://www.dawn.com/news/1259568
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/rare-pictures-of-quaid-e-azam.112256/page-18#post-1223546
From Mirza Ghulaam Ahmed's theological perspective it does/did.how does not believing in Mirza Gulam Ahmad make me a Kaffir ? he was a guy who claim Prophet-hood which is rejected by ( as far as i know ) all Muslims , so on what exactly bases Ahmadi claim that others who don't take Mirza Gulam as Prophet as Kaffir ?
can anyone honestly answer me ?
Can you help me find it?
Also the Dawn article does not mention that quote you quoted.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1259568In the early 1940s, when Jinnah was trying to form a broad-based collation to bolster the fortunes of the All India Muslim League (AIML), he was asked by some of his potential non-AIML allies to declare the Ahmadis as non-Muslim.
In May 1944, during a press conference in Kashmir, Jinnah said to the gathered pressmen, “who am I to call a person non-Muslim who calls himself a Muslim …”
Yes I see that, but where does it say "...not even the sovereign legislature has the right to say otherwise."?
Yes I see that, but where does it say "...not even the sovereign legislature has the right to say otherwise."?
These newspapers don't have first hand sources in them. Can you find the first hand sources?Jinnah said that on different occasions .. On May 5th, and May 23rd 1944:
https://dailytimes.com.pk/96818/a-case-for-a-persecuted-people/
http://pakteahouse.net/2011/12/15/are-ahmadis-non-muslims/
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...sion-for-pakistan_us_59fd06d7e4b05e3e1f0a0130
I have emailed Zeeba Hashmi for her sources as well.Jinnah said that on different occasions .. On May 5th, and May 23rd 1944:
https://dailytimes.com.pk/96818/a-case-for-a-persecuted-people/
http://pakteahouse.net/2011/12/15/are-ahmadis-non-muslims/
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...sion-for-pakistan_us_59fd06d7e4b05e3e1f0a0130
the reason I ask is, like you have said on previous occasions about people trying to justify their positions with what Quaid e Azaam said or did or not said or not did. Like for example the issue about the Muhammad Asad and Dept of Islamic reconstruction. One party says this thing and another says something different....Jinnah said that on different occasions .. On May 5th, and May 23rd 1944:
https://dailytimes.com.pk/96818/a-case-for-a-persecuted-people/
http://pakteahouse.net/2011/12/15/are-ahmadis-non-muslims/
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...sion-for-pakistan_us_59fd06d7e4b05e3e1f0a0130
.. Like for example the issue about the Muhammad Asad and Dept of Islamic reconstruction. One party says this thing and another says something different....