Let's be blunt : IAF has one jet in inventory with an AESA.*
Sweden has pulse doppler units and a prototype.
Stop buggering the Indians, mate . . . or are you jealous?
Good day still, Tay.
* And 2052 in, RBE2 coming, UTTAM going for it, that's 3 sooner than later!
The SAAB competence in GaN AESA is highly relevant to the MII deal since it is offered as ToT.
The Indians here first deny that SAAB has any radar competence.
I have shown that SAAB has been working with Radar for 50 years.
Then it is denied that SAAB has AESA radar competence.
I have shown that EriEye is AESA and has been around for 30 years.
Then they do not believe SAAB has GaN.
Once it is proven that SAAB actually have what they need, they claim they do not need it
because they already have it.
Then they claim that SAABs offer of GaN AESA ToT as part of a Gripen deal is a request for help.
An announcement that India plans to build a foundry for GaN is taken as proof they have a foundry.
A GaAs module is used as proof they have a GaN module.
The development of a AESA based radar is proof that it must be based on GaN.
They claim that F-16 production and ToT has been denied, which has been proven false.
They claim that SE project is dead... while Indian government is negotiation - no source.
They claim that F-16 parts are produced only by US companies, proven false.
Once Indians start to accept facts and provide real sources, they will not have to be buggered.