What's new

Made in Iran

this diagram indicates that for the 72-seat ARJ-72 turbofan aircraft they took the IrAn-140 /AN-140 as a basis
View attachment 906997

curious about how the IRJ-72 could be, this evening I wanted to play with the images, starting from a photo of the "Simorgh", and with cut, copy, stretch, modify and paste, this is the result.
:ashamed:
IRJ-72.png
 
curious about how the IRJ-72 could be, this evening I wanted to play with the images, starting from a photo of the "Simorgh", and with cut, copy, stretch, modify and paste, this is the result.
:ashamed:
View attachment 907463
Hi

Hope I'm not off topic. But I wrote the above up as follows.

If it takes a village to raise a child, then it takes a country to raise an aircraft. Either that country pulls together as one, or it falls together as one.

A possible plus to this may be found in Iran’s planned IRJ-72 indigenous civilian passenger a/c. With a capacity of 72 to ~100 seats, this a/c is scheduled to fly in 2025. The engine intended to power it has not yet been revealed publicly. A total of 550 passenger a/c are required to rejuvenate Iran’s air transport sector. In order to produce a reliable civilian engine. Imagine what even a portion of such a production run, would do for the economies of scale of say an RD-33+ (22 000lbf), as well as that of the civilian engine.

None of these 2 engines are of course in existence, being mere congestions by myself.
 
Last edited:
Hi

Hope I'm not off topic. But I wrote the above up as follows.

If it takes a village to raise a child, then it takes a country to raise an aircraft. Either that country pulls together as one, or it falls together as one.

A possible plus to this may be found in Iran’s planned IRJ-72 indigenous civilian passenger a/c. With a capacity of 72 to ~100 seats, this a/c is scheduled to fly in 2025. The engine intended to power it has not yet been revealed publicly. A total of 550 passenger a/c are required to rejuvenate Iran’s air transport sector. In order to produce a reliable civilian engine. Imagine what even a portion of such a production run, would do for the economies of scale of say an RD-33+ (22 000lbf), as well as that of the civilian engine.

None of these 2 engines are of course in existence, being mere congestions by myself.
if an Iranian turbofan is not in production and a sure ban on the use of engines of Western origin, since in recent days there have been news indicating a collaboration with Russia in the aeronautical field, a possible candidate for the IRJ-72 could already be indicated, that is, I am thinking of the PD-8 which will be installed on the Superjet New (SSJ-100 without components imported) and a version of it for the Beriev BE-200 amphibious aircraft. The PD-8 is indicated to be certified in 2023 and deliveries of the mass production engines will begin later this year. A version of the PD-8 dedicated to the IRJ-72 may already be ready when this new passenger aircraft makes its maiden flight in the year 2025.
 
if an Iranian turbofan is not in production and a sure ban on the use of engines of Western origin, since in recent days there have been news indicating a collaboration with Russia in the aeronautical field, a possible candidate for the IRJ-72 could already be indicated, that is, I am thinking of the PD-8 which will be installed on the Superjet New (SSJ-100 without components imported) and a version of it for the Beriev BE-200 amphibious aircraft. The PD-8 is indicated to be certified in 2023 and deliveries of the mass production engines will begin later this year. A version of the PD-8 dedicated to the IRJ-72 may already be ready when this new passenger aircraft makes its maiden flight in the year 2025.
Thank you for your input.

I realized that a military t/fan cannot be directly read over to a civilian one.

What I had in mind - ToT not withstanding, is the entire supply chain intended to produce a 'heavy' engine (viz. RD-33 et al?) mentioned in September 2016, and alluded to in July 2020 again, taking cognizance and utilize research, production, and assembly facilities relevant to this heavy engine - and possibly PD-8.

So, my Q would be, how many overlaps there would be between the above 'heavy engine' and say a PD-8 as to avoid duplication and as yet improve the economies of scale of both.

Another thing that really puzzles me is the Supreme Leaders directive to MAPNA of October 2018, directing it to reverse engineer the '33' (= Klimov-33) to render a thrust of 20 000 ( presumably lbf).

Down here when I was researching my country's WMD programs I could rely on a small circle (~5) of well informed insiders to keep me on the thin and narrow. Not quite smoke filled back rooms, but close enough ...

I do not of course enjoy the same luxury pertaining to Iran, that is why I would like to enquire about the Supreme Leaders directive to MAPNA.

Piet
 
Buone notizie "forse" anche per l'IRJ-72 o altro progetto di aereo passeggeri di costruzione iraniana
Sono iniziati i test di volo del PD-8 (ПД-8).
La United Engine Corporation of Rostec ha iniziato i test di volo della centrale elettrica PD-8 progettato per il NUOVO aereo di linea passeggeri a corto raggio SSJ e per l'aereo anfibio Be-200.
Il motore è in fase di test nell'ambito del laboratorio di volo Il-76LL, di proprietà della Gromov LII UAC.
9988642_originale (1).jpg

Vengono registrati i principali dati operativi: velocità, pressione, temperatura, nonché parametri aggiuntivi necessari per confermare le decisioni progettuali prese e garantire la sicurezza del funzionamento della centrale elettrica.
****/rostecru/5179
https://tass.com/economy/1555979
 
Last edited:
Iran need more time and more money


Iran could not get the super alloys yet
No semiconductors


I know alot
Iran produces Gas Turbine using "single crystal" Nickel super alloy "Check MAPNA COMPANY". Iran is among top nations in making such alloys, as well high performance Gas Turbines. Iran also has semiconductor FABs and is only muslim nation with such industries. You're clueless about Iran due to your reliance on open source "Israeli, and US" propaganda.
 
Singapore would not be categorized as Muslim country in my book. The industrial sector in Singapore is mostly Chinese dominated. Also, the FABs are not indigenous Singapore established but a joint-venture between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Philips Semiconductors and Singapore's EDB Investments as a partner. Moreover, the example I gave meant the greater region of the near/middle east.
 
Last edited:
Singapore would not be categorized as Muslim country in my book. The industrial sector in Singapore is mostly Chinese dominated. Also, the FABs are not indigenous Singapore established but a joint-venture between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Philips Semiconductors and Singapore's EDB Investments as a partner. Moreover, the example I gave meant the greater region of the near/middle east.
those are Malaysia not Singapore
 
Back
Top Bottom