takeiteasy
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2010
- Messages
- 3,000
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
It's almost 3 years after I sold out Vista quadrajet(fiat multijet 1.3). It was a fantastic car spacious and a people carrier although handling is mediocre. The experience taught me, build quality, precision of parts and the minimum tolerance level to accept for assembly line are where Tata failed miserably. 60% parts tolerance is what Tata allowed? (As per Concorde Service guy) This means for every visit you'll be replacing some parts or another. I've got even turbo replaced for free.
For a Japanese car - What you gets assembled stays together as one piece - will not have to be replaced even after 5 years of hard use. No underbody rusting (we're in coastal region) or the vehicle shows ageing in just 2-3 years of use - which Tata and Mahindra vehicles surely shows. I don't know whether their build quality or manufacturing practices have improved in just 3 years. The cars Tata makes are good, spacious and the FE is also better. But, manufacturing process is not proper. Ancillary manufacturers are also to be blamed, but when they're asked to low down prices what will they do? - compromise on quality. Still, Tata is a taxi market car manufacturer. People expects reliability in developing countries even if the price is slightly higher. That's precisely the reason why Toyota Innova, a Thailand design, not even a original Toyota Japan product, is a big hit in India just because of the assembling quality and reliability. Maruti, with it's tin foil metal thickness also succeed because of good manufacturing, a trait of Japanese cars.
While, with Motorcycle manufactures, quality seems almost consistent although Bajaj was poor quality with respect to engine life and all. Don't know how it is now. TVS is way good in manufacturing, but not so popular up in the north, it seems.
For a Japanese car - What you gets assembled stays together as one piece - will not have to be replaced even after 5 years of hard use. No underbody rusting (we're in coastal region) or the vehicle shows ageing in just 2-3 years of use - which Tata and Mahindra vehicles surely shows. I don't know whether their build quality or manufacturing practices have improved in just 3 years. The cars Tata makes are good, spacious and the FE is also better. But, manufacturing process is not proper. Ancillary manufacturers are also to be blamed, but when they're asked to low down prices what will they do? - compromise on quality. Still, Tata is a taxi market car manufacturer. People expects reliability in developing countries even if the price is slightly higher. That's precisely the reason why Toyota Innova, a Thailand design, not even a original Toyota Japan product, is a big hit in India just because of the assembling quality and reliability. Maruti, with it's tin foil metal thickness also succeed because of good manufacturing, a trait of Japanese cars.
While, with Motorcycle manufactures, quality seems almost consistent although Bajaj was poor quality with respect to engine life and all. Don't know how it is now. TVS is way good in manufacturing, but not so popular up in the north, it seems.