The Accountant
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2016
- Messages
- 8,504
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
These are based on rumours like purchase of cm400AKG is not confirmed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These are based on rumours like purchase of cm400AKG is not confirmed
I think pakistan needs to work with turkey on seeker technology while pakistan needs to help turkey with ballistic missile tech
That's not a credible argument. It's still a deterrent. It's better to have that capability and not using it than not having it.Turkey doesn't have need for anything more than tactical ballistic missiles, we simply do not have the warhead that would make use of it (Chemical/biological or Nuclear), conventional warheads do not pose enough of a deterrent to invest in longer ranged ballistic missiles.
It would be best if Pak-Tuk collaborated on satellite launch vehicles.
Turkey doesn't have need for anything more than tactical ballistic missiles, we simply do not have the warhead that would make use of it (Chemical/biological or Nuclear), conventional warheads do not pose enough of a deterrent to invest in longer ranged ballistic missiles.
It would be best if Pak-Tuk collaborated on satellite launch vehicles.
No sir,,, there could be various use of these ballistic missile example is Chinese DF21D ... They use ballistic missile in antiship role and in this role defending against ballistic missile is way to diffcult in comparison to cruise missile ...Turkey doesn't have need for anything more than tactical ballistic missiles, we simply do not have the warhead that would make use of it (Chemical/biological or Nuclear), conventional warheads do not pose enough of a deterrent to invest in longer ranged ballistic missiles.
It would be best if Pak-Tuk collaborated on satellite launch vehicles.
No sir,,, there could be various use of these ballistic missile example is Chinese DF21D ... They use ballistic missile in antiship role and in this role defending against ballistic missile is way to diffcult in comparison to cruise missile ...
Yes, the best co-operation has to be in the field of SLV. Pak does have a passive program in this regard. With Ababeel being operational means SLV is practical.
Turkish companies working on stattelites and such would mean a win-win cooperation for the one nation with two flags.
With link17 awacs I hope so300KM thats great Sir but how will the fighter like JF-17 get a lock from that far.
Even with the new AESA radar its detection range for 5m2 targets will be somewhere 200 km?
300KM thats great Sir but how will the fighter like JF-17 get a lock from that far.
Even with the new AESA radar its detection range for 5m2 targets will be somewhere 200 km?
so what, Mirages from Egypt are basically for spares for our Mirages and F-16-block-70/72 will come with AMRAAM C-7 which have better range then Meteor that india is getting with RAFALE, and projected F-16 block 72 is on the par with RAFALE (comparable to RAFALE ) @Syed1.We are doing bhangra over possible induction of Mirages and F-16.... While our enemy is moving onto new, modern jets.