What's new

Life-size sculpture of Ranjit Singh to be unveiled at Lahore Fort

This is actually the major opinion.

Only among those who don't know anything about Alexander.

How many Pakistanis are named after him, it should tell you how revered he is.

He's respected, not adored (unless you're one of the tribes like the Kalash who claim descent from him).

It was neither Cyrus nor Alexander. One was a Zoroastrian while the other was polytheist. It was somebody else. Someone who might have existed before the recorded history. Recorded history only dates back to 5000 years.

The earliest mention of a Dhul Qarnayn like figure comes from Sumerian stories, so yes, he probably is someone from really far back.
 
.
During Ranjits reign this mosque in Pekhewar was used to hang 10s of people daily. All of them muslim.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D-F7ycsXUAEv1CU.png

Abducting Muslim hazarewal , Muslim Pakhtun women and Muslim Punjabi women was a sport of the highest order for the Sikhs in this time.

An example :


Ranjit singh himself was found of abducting Muslims for his harem. There was a rather famous documented case of him committing indecencies in public with a Muslim women atop an elephant.

During his reign the Sikhs slaughtered Niazis Tareens Potoharies and other Punjabis by the truck load because of their constant rebellions and their refusal to bow down to him in land where the call to prayer was banned.

He turned mosque into stable where his horses crapped all over the house of God.

Now Im sure lottas like Fawad Chaudhry would have happily sold his daughters to Mr Ranjit but I expected better from other Punjabis.

He starved Kashmir to death and appointed tyrants over them. The repercussions of this would be felt over today's Kashmir issue when Hari Singh sided with India.

This man was no sher-e-Punjab he was shere Sikh sure but dnt sully your name by calling him sher-e-Punjab. He butchered far more Muslim Punjabis then anyone else.

If Pakistan wishes to pander to Khalistanis do not do it at the cost of your own country unity and the sentiments of your fellow countrymen and certainly not at the cost of your own self respect because this viliest cuckoldry.

Have a little self respect for all our sake and take that statue down or at the very least remove that sher-e-Punjab crap...

Credits goes to reddit user.
 
.
Apnay kufr/irtidad k fatwon ki batti bana and shove it up your rear end Afghani mofo.

Lmao you're only proving I'm right.

Imam As-Sarakhsi said in ‘Al-Mabsut’ in the book of ‘Siyar’: “From the hadith of Adh-Dhahabi (ra) ‘that the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم went out the day of Uhud where there was a husna squadron or he said khushna. So he صلى الله عليه وسلم said: Who are these? They said: The Jews so and so. So he صلى الله عليه وسلم said: We do not seek assistance of disbelievers.’ Its interpretation (ta’weel) is that they were powerful in themselves not fighting under the Muslims’ banner. For us, we only seek assistance from them if they were fighting under the Muslims’ banner whereas if they come independent with their own banner then we do not seek assistance from them. This is the interpretation of what was narrated when the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم said: ‘Do not seek light from the fire of the polytheists’ narrated by Ahmad and An-Nisa’I via the way of Anas and he صلى الله عليه وسلم said: “I am free (bariu) from every Muslim who fights together with a polytheist’ meaning if the Muslim is under the polytheists’ banner.”

Imaam Ahmad reported that Abu Moosa al-Ash’ari (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: “I said to ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him). ‘I have a Christian scribe.’ He said, ‘What is wrong with you, may Allaah strike you dead! Have you not heard the words of Allaah (interpretation of the meaning), “O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as awliya’ (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but awliya’ to one another…” [al-Maa’idah 5:51]”? Why do you not employ a haneef [i.e., a Muslim]?’ I said, ‘O Ameer al-Mu’mineen, I benefit from his work and he keeps his religion to himself.’ He said, ‘I will never honour them when Allaah has humiliated them, and I will never bring them close to me when Allaah has expelled them from His mercy.’”
 
. .
No he’s not. Typing from a village under the star-filled sky in Bahawalpur, btw.
use the PM Portal to make GoP aware of your hurt sentiments.

muslims also have rights in ryasat e madina

Lmao what a child, "HURR DURR ADDRESS DE".

Abey darta kiyon hai Afghani?
Chai peetay hain kisi din sath mein
Mein bhi daikhon k screen k peechay chup k barri barri baatein kernay wala hai kitnay paani mein

there is a big plain east of Megiddo. go fight there. leave pakistanis alone
 
. .
Saday waderay ya babay have lived with Sikhs and even speak punjabi like some of their elders do. None of them have ever said that Ranjit kana Singh was a good guy.
 
.
Saday waderay ya babay have lived with Sikhs and even speak punjabi like some of their elders do. None of them have ever said that Ranjit kana Singh was a good guy.

PTI mulk ki shinaakht badal rahi ha.

rok Sakko to rok lo
 
.
And I am sure this taimur guy would be a much more reasonable guy in his real life compared to what he is on internet/PDF.

I'm part of a special breed of people who act the same both online and offline.
 
.
I'm part of a special breed of people who act the same both online and offline.

you are consistently annoying.

i value that.

where are your posts in the interest hike threads and ease of marriage Bill or any of that.

you one of those tha tha maar do kaat do walay mausami musalman?
 
.
you are consistently annoying.

Rofl rich coming from you. I think I speak for most members here when I say you are despised. But at least you keep the forum from dying.

where are your posts in the interest hike threads and ease of marriage Bill or any of that.

I prefer to observe those, history is more of my speciality.
 
.
Rofl rich coming from you. I think I speak for most members here when I say you are despised. But at least you keep the forum from dying.

I am your holy grail i know that.

I prefer to observe those, history is more of my speciality.

history is rewritten each day. you would do what your ancestor did and proudly and no Prophet is coming so you are screwed anyhow.
 
. .
I'm part of a special breed of people who act the same both online and offline.

You are no special breed ... You are the ordinary sectarian and racist type keyboard warrior one comes across on the internet quite often. In real life (without this anonymity and incognito masks), you would be a much better person, I bet.

But bhai ap jaisay nasl aur firqa parast posters aj kal PDF pe majority mein hain jin ko chand mutassib aur tang nazar PDF management mimbran ki pori support haasil hy, so, I think it's time to call it a day .. Won't be posting here anymore .. No hard feelings .. Bye
 
. .
http://materiaislamica.com/index.php/Persecution_of_Muslims_in_the_Sikh_Empire_(1799—1849)

Persecution Under Ranjit Singh:— The state of Kashmir was conquered by the Mughals between 1586—1588, and who's rule was popular.[1] Akbar the Great visited the state on three occasions (1588, 1592, and 1597)[1] and even his son Jahangir, and later still Shah Jahan, would also honour this new found tradition.

In 1599 during the construction of the Nagar Fort, Akbar even refused to use forced labour, and insisted on paying his workers a fair wage from his treasury.[1]

However in 1820 the demographically Muslim Kashmir state was occupied by the tyrant, and Sikh ruler, Ranjit Singh (1780—1839), under who's regime non-Sikhs were widely persecuted; eating beef was banned and the repair of non-Sikh religious buildings was forbidden.[1]

The Sikhs later lost Kashmir in 1846; a mere twenty-six years after their invasion.[1]Pakistani historian Istiaq Ahmed once erroneously claimed that Singh "provided the most tolerant and benevolent rule" in Kashmir.[2]This has been contradicted by evidence discovered from other historians such as Barbara Brower and Barbara Rose Johnston.[3]

Sikhs for example were the first "bigoted rulers"who introduced forced labour into Kashmir, who also banned "muezzins call to prayer, closing many mosques, making cow slaughter punishable by death" and "nearly" destroyed "the Shah-i-Hamdan mosque".[3] Singh also "razed mosques and built Gurdwaras in their place" and buried the Quran in their doorways.[4]

Prior to Singh's persecution, independent Sikh bands, known as "misals", terrorized Muslims in the Punjab, who had "developed a number of institutions enabling them to wage a dispersed and yet united war" between 1761—1772.[5]


Pakistan Kashmir.
Khalistan:— The concept of Khalistan and Sikh militancy also possesses some potential for threatening the state of Muslims in the Punjab. The concept of a Sikh homeland encompasses lands and territories inside and around India, as well as Pakistani territory.[6] This also includes all other Punjabi speaking areas,[6] despite the fact that such a proposition would make the Sikhs a minority in their own country (since the majority of Punjabis are Muslim).[n. 2]

Significantly Pakistani Punjab contains many Sikh holy and historical sites, and even when the Sikhs did have their own "Khalistan", in the form of the empire of the Sikh tyrant,[7][8][13]Ranjit Singh, Muslims were treated horrendously and with much inequality, along with other non-Sikhs.[10]

Such examples can be seen from the use of slave labour (forced labour[3]) and matters which concerned murder (for example if a Sikh murdered a Muslim, a fine of 16—20 rupees was to be charged on the Sikh, of which only 2 rupees (10%—12.5%) went to the family of the Muslim victim, and if Hindu four rupees (20%—25%) would be paid to the Hindu relatives, with the rest going to the Sikh state; in essence under Sikh laws Hindus were worth twice more than a Muslim).[10]

Also, under Sikh law, Punjabis (90% of whom were Muslim[11]) were taxed 90% of their earnings (but even this was considered too little).[10]

Despite this, as late as 2001 Sikhs sent letters to Muslims asking for their "support", citing "200,000" Sikhs had been killed by India since 1984, and 75,000 Muslims in Kashmir since 1988.[12] This inequality amongst an actual religious Sikh state is perhaps one reason why Pakistan did not support the Khalistan Sikh movement fully during the 1980s.


Sources

Footnotes

  1. ^ Quote: "Consider the fact that some 100-120 million human beings can be classified as ethnic Punjabis...Eighty million Punjabis live mainly in Pakistan's western Punjab...30 million in India, mainly in Indian eastern Punjab...10 million are dispersed outside the Indian subcontinent."
    1. Ishtiaq Ahmed (May 24th, 2008). Punjabis Without Punjabi. Academy of the Punjab in North America. International The News. Retrieved September 14th, 2015.
  • ^ Quote: "Consider the fact that some 100-120 million human beings can be classified as ethnic Punjabis...Eighty million Punjabis live mainly in Pakistan's western Punjab...30 million in India, mainly in Indian eastern Punjab...10 million are dispersed outside the Indian subcontinent."
    1. Ishtiaq Ahmed (May 24th, 2008). Punjabis Without Punjabi. Academy of the Punjab in North America. International The News. Retrieved September 14th, 2015.


References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Ahmad Hasan Dani; Vadim Mikhaĭlovich Masson; Unesco (1 January 2003). History of Civilizations of Central Asia: Development in contrast : from the sixteenth to the mid-nineteenth century. UNESCO. pp. 317–319. ISBN 978-92-3-103876-1.
  2. ^ a b Ahmed, Istiaq (August 19, 2012). VIEW: The 'bloody' Punjab partition — V —Ishtiaq Ahmed. Daily Times. Retrieved 22 May 2014.
  3. ^ a b c d e f Barbara Brower; Barbara Rose Johnston (2007). DISAPPEARING PEOPLES?: INDIGENOUS GROUPS AND ETHNIC MINORITIES IN SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA. Left Coast Press. p. 135. ISBN 978-1-59874-121-6.
  4. ^ a b The Sikh Review. Sikh Cultural Centre. 2005. p. 53.
  5. ^ a b Ahmad Hasan Dani; Vadim Mikhaĭlovich Masson; Unesco (1 January 2003). History of Civilizations of Central Asia: Development in contrast : from the sixteenth to the mid-nineteenth century. UNESCO. pp. 320. ISBN 978-92-3-103876-1.
  6. ^ a b c d Om Gupta (1 April 2006). Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Gyan Publishing House. p. 1233. ISBN 978-81-8205-389-2.
  7. ^ a b J. C. French (1931). Himalayan Art. Neeraj Publishing House. p. 17.
  8. ^ a b Priscilla Hayter Napier (1 January 1990). I have Sind: Charles Napier in India, 1841-1844. M. Russell. p. 50.
  9. ^ Country Life. Country Life, Limited. 1980. p. 463.
  10. ^ a b c d e f Parmanand Parashar (1 January 2004). Kashmir The Paradise Of Asia. Sarup & Sons. pp. 6–7. ISBN 978-81-7625-518-9.
  11. ^ a b Nyla Ali Khan (15 September 2010). Islam, Women, and Violence in Kashmir: Between India and Pakistan. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-230-11352-7
  12. ^ a b Kulwant Rai Gupta (2003). India-Pakistan Relations with Special Reference to Kashmir. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. p. 334. ISBN 978-81-269-0271-2
  13. ^ Country Life. Country Life, Limited. 1980. p. 463.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom