KS
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2010
- Messages
- 12,528
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I think you meant can't do jack. actually, the resolution says any means short of boots on the ground i.e. they can also shoot the artillery and tanks
I forgot to add - "If".
Anyways this is a wait and watch game. Where's my popcorn ?
this is not argh ----people chatting away only- these are videos being sent and seen. These are 4 NY times journalist who been kidnapped by the Libyan govt because they ventured and caught scenes of murder and mayhem...
Same can be said about Kashmir. See media in today's world are a law unto themselves.You cant blindly believe what is being said.
that's the madman's ceasefire and it means nothing to the US/ NATO. you do know he is also going to be indicted for crimes in the international courts. its a done deal, he is finished ruling that country. they have to still take out the air defenses and not bound by his cease fire.
Even in a madman's ceasefire, the Guns dont fire. Lets get it straight I think the Brits are just itching to avenge the Lockerbie fiasco and now have got a good reason to do that.Too bad that Qadaffi has declared a ceasefire now.
what hell has your gas to with it other than the prices will still be up if India agreed or not...
Oil prices have reduced about 3 dollars after the ceasefire announcement and I would hope the French and the Brits dont do anything stupid to exacerbate the situation.
OIL FUTURES: Oil Prices Flat On Libya Cease-Fire Uncertainty - WSJ.com
the larger point was who has changed the Palestinian policy of a two state solution? Not India . it is good with both countries
Still doesnt prove your assertion that supporting Palestine vociferously got us any favours from the Arab world.
1 ) The US does not support them attacking unharmed civilians or its people. The Arab league is cracking down and suadia arabia's army is in bahrain. The US supported these countries but has always told them they need to get more democratic. 2 ) Just one month before Egypt revolution- the US sec of state gave a speech in Egypt asking Egypt Mubarak to institute more democratic reforms. The US did not come to Mubark's aid during that revolution. Infact the entire Egyptian Military leadership were in the pentagon ( pre determined visit) when the revolution in egypt broke out. and US exerted presuure on the military to not attack its people.
Oh C'mon enough of this ;
1) A foreign nation's troops going into another country to suppress a peaceful protest by a large majority of the country's discriminated citizens and the best the US can come up with is just a statement that they need to be more democratic. Again, C'Mon !!!
Saudi troops bombed the $ out of the Shia protestors in its eastern provinces who were demanding end to the discrimiantion, but did we hear a whimper from the US ?
2) Coming to Mubarak ; the US was anything but critical towards Mubarak. It never publicly criticised Mubarak while maintaining a very ambivalent stance saying that people's wish should be respected.
There is nothing for you to defend here. The US will sleep with the worst of the dictators if it is of any use to America and that is how it should be. And this is how I would like India also to be.
these are NOT western policies, these core Indian , Gandhian policies of human rights... since when did it become fashionable otherwise ?
Oh these Gandhian Values are long passe. If India needs to be a great power, she must learn to play the double faced game of the great powers. Enough of this moral BS. Chanakiyan diplomacy FTW.