What's new

LHC hearing to remove Nawaz from ECL

There is hope if it is Justice Baqir. But howcome such expedited hearing???

This is same judge, who granted bail to Maryam Tweetni.

Now LHC after IHC:

ایک اور دلے کا سامنا تھا منیر مجھ کو
میں ایک دلا بھگت چکا جب تو میں نے دیکھا

:lol:
 
.
It's win win for everyone PTI can save face by putting on LHC,LHC can save face by putting it on NAB.Fanboys would save NAB by blaming common man.
Us Pakistanis would stand losers as usual in this cat and mouse game.
IMO, the ECL is separate from the courts. The courts can only interpret the laws/rules that govern the ECL and make a determination on whether the laws/rules give the govt the authority to place conditions on removal from the ECL. From what I know, ECL rules don’t explicitly state that the govt can apply conditions for removal, but they don’t say the govt CANNOT apply conditions either.
 
.
upload_2019-11-14_16-33-8.png


:lol::lol::lol::lol:

جب میاں بیوی رازی تو کیا کرے گا قاضی

Things have already been decided by the powers that be. What would "bechaara" judge do??
This is haqeeqat.. good comment..
 
.
IMO, the ECL is separate from the courts. The courts can only interpret the laws/rules that govern the ECL and make a determination on whether the laws/rules give the govt the authority to place conditions on removal from the ECL. From what I know, ECL rules don’t explicitly state that the govt can apply conditions for removal, but they don’t say the govt CANNOT apply conditions either.

May I remind you that there is precedent for a person on ECL to be escorted to the airport to leave the country.
 
. . . .
Matters of ECL are separate from matters of court, or so we are told.
I have heard there is no precedent of a convicted person being removed from ECL.. But I may be wrong.

That's why government is also saying that they are not taking NS's name out of the list, only giving him a one time permission as an exception.. don't know what it means tbh.
 
.
I have heard there is no precedent of a convicted person being removed from ECL.. But I may be wrong.

That's why government is also saying that they are not taking NS's name out of the list, only giving him a one time permission as an exception.. don't know what it means tbh.

That is why I have said many times that we need to wait and see how this entire sage proceeds according to the decisions being made, or just a game of pass the buck being played.
 
.
Lahore high court ...... lolz...............
 
. . .
IMO, the ECL is separate from the courts. The courts can only interpret the laws/rules that govern the ECL and make a determination on whether the laws/rules give the govt the authority to place conditions on removal from the ECL. From what I know, ECL rules don’t explicitly state that the govt can apply conditions for removal, but they don’t say the govt CANNOT apply conditions either.
ECL as i know is directly related to court.
 
.
Geht dir gut Chachu?

Ganz gut. Danke fur die Nachfrage.

LHC verdict whatever it is can be challenged if the Government of Pakistan perceives it as a threat to social security of the populace. I think the government struck a deal 6 months ago and are now playing the hot potato game to keep the masses misinformed so the blame cannot be put on one party alone.

This government has a habit of going for the easy options be it Accountability or IMF.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom