What's new

Lebonan🇱🇧-Israel🇮🇱 Warr

BREAKING🚨🚨

Initial reports confirm the assassination of Israeli Army Chief of Staff, Herzi Halevi.
1728888688900.jpeg
 
BREAKING NEWS

Hezbollah Leader Hassan Nasrallah Alive and running Military Operations.

Israeli media Hadshot Yisrael Reports that Hassan Nasrallah has deceived us and is still alive and running military operations.
1728955179956.jpeg
 
Israel is destroying villages, buildings, houses, and suburbs with mass casualties on the border, in Beirut, and other parts of Lebanon. I was thinking in this scenario Hezbollah would launch massive rocket and missile attacks deep into Israel but have not seen it.
 
There are reports that Yemen is bombed by B2 bombers(Diego Garcia base possibly). If Houthis have ballistic missiles with enough range they should keep the target on diego garcia usa base and use the missiles when they find it necessary.

Karrar a2a drones should be transferred to Yemen and training should be given to them to use them(online or face to face). Karrar drones can land by parachute after being launched from Iranian ships etc. and land to Yemen to be used by Houthis. This can be a good combination with their existing surface to air capabilities. Old radars can still be used for early warning if they still have them against israeli aircraft like F15s(even F35s if older long wavelength radars or Iranian vhf radar tech transfer) and their existing IIR sensors can be used for tracking and launching sams. Radars are primary targets for cruise missiles and similar and they are continiously searched by Usa-israeli satellites. This must be kept in mind and radar should be moved continiously. Every 2 or 3 hours radar location must change to a new place.

Even if radars or iir sensors dont detect some incoming aircraft , when one location is bombed by some enemy aircraft Karrar drones can be launched towards that location to high altitude.They can be launched by rocket assist and recovered by parachute. New ones have electro-optic infrared sensors so they can find the intruding aircraft and then they can attack it be it a bomber or an aircraft.

Iran and Yemenis must think of how usa finds out about the bunker positions and how to carry some equipment to new locations as the bunker positions are gradually found out by israel-usa. By intel or by satellite pictures they seem to find possible locations of bunkers. But they still need to get close by planes to bomb the bunkers. Cruise missiles wont do the job it seems as they risked B2s to do it.


Passive radar is another item that has future in my opinion. It can use cheap fm transmitters as illuminators and catch targets while passive radar is hiding far away from those illuminators. Even if fm transmitters are hit. They can be replaced easily and won't cost loss of personnel as well. Ofcourse transmitters and the passive radar should still be protected by shorads and similar systems nearby eventhough transmitters are more numereous and survivable than active radar and passive component is more stealthy. Also fm transmitter locations should be changed periodically and rapidly.

No need to launch sams by using this radar. Passive radar will be for search-scanning and give estimated-rough areas for other tracking systems to take over and search-track targets more throughly. IIR electro-optical trackers + laser-radar rangefinder will take over after rough estimates are made. These will track targets and guide the surface to air missiles.


 
Last edited:
There are also reports that israel attacked weapons depots Latakia Syria. Yes Tartus port can bu used by Iran to transfer weapons like surface to air missiles to Syria and then Labennon but it is not an intelligent move to not to take precautions after that. There are obviously many foreign agents in Syria just like in Labennon, Maybe some government officials or maybe inside the Syrian or even Russian personnel or even some Iranian personnel who knows. If you dont consider this possibility ofcourse the weapons depot will be destroyed.

Also previous israeli bombing of Iranian commander in Damascus was a similar mistake disregarding foreign intel agents. The meeting could have been made in a safe bunker as israeli planes cannot get close to Damascus but launch popeye from long ranges so they cant drop bunker buster bombs in Damascus unless they gain air control like in Beirut. Also if Iranian short range mobile sam systems were transferred before they could have shot down more cruise missiles as point defense than Syrian ad that protects large areas.

After the weapons are stored in a weapons depot in Syria, isreal getting the intel about the location of the depot immediately strikes there with popeye cruise missiles. A few can be brought down by Syrian air defense but it is not enough to protect a static position.


Always calculate that the place of your weapons depot is known by the enemy. For example surface to air missiles. After it is transferred to Tartus port for example short range surface to air missiles(ciws types can be beneficial too. ciws-cram can be in theory effective against bunker buster bombs, jdams as well) that can shoot down popeye cruise missiles should be mobile after they land in Tartus and immediately deployed around the place you want to protect from israeli popeye attacks. That is they should transfer to areas immediately and deploy there protecting the area of initial weapons storage facilities near Latakia-Tartus and also undisclosed weapons depots deep inside Syria.

If it is rockets, tactical bms or similar there should be very little time after it is loaded to the depot around Latakia and then almost immediately they should be taken away from there to other undisclosed locations(protected by Iranian short range air defense mentioned before). Smaller depots separated apart are better than large single depots as all items are less likely to be targeted at the same time in that case. Then gradually all items can be transferred to Hezbollah and Syrian-Iraqi resistance fighters in that region.
 
Last edited:

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom