What's new

Lebonan🇱🇧-Israel🇮🇱 Warr

BREAKING🚨🚨

Initial reports confirm the assassination of Israeli Army Chief of Staff, Herzi Halevi.
1728888688900.jpeg
 
. .
BREAKING NEWS

Hezbollah Leader Hassan Nasrallah Alive and running Military Operations.

Israeli media Hadshot Yisrael Reports that Hassan Nasrallah has deceived us and is still alive and running military operations.
1728955179956.jpeg
 
.
Israel is destroying villages, buildings, houses, and suburbs with mass casualties on the border, in Beirut, and other parts of Lebanon. I was thinking in this scenario Hezbollah would launch massive rocket and missile attacks deep into Israel but have not seen it.
 
.
There are reports that Yemen is bombed by B2 bombers(Diego Garcia base possibly). If Houthis have ballistic missiles with enough range they should keep the target on diego garcia usa base and use the missiles when they find it necessary.

Karrar a2a drones should be transferred to Yemen and training should be given to them to use them(online or face to face). Karrar drones can land by parachute after being launched from Iranian ships etc. and land to Yemen to be used by Houthis. This can be a good combination with their existing surface to air capabilities. Old radars can still be used for early warning if they still have them against israeli aircraft like F15s(even F35s if older long wavelength radars or Iranian vhf radar tech transfer) and their existing IIR sensors can be used for tracking and launching sams. Radars are primary targets for cruise missiles and similar and they are continiously searched by Usa-israeli satellites. This must be kept in mind and radar should be moved continiously. Every 2 or 3 hours radar location must change to a new place.

Even if radars or iir sensors dont detect some incoming aircraft , when one location is bombed by some enemy aircraft Karrar drones can be launched towards that location to high altitude.They can be launched by rocket assist and recovered by parachute. New ones have electro-optic infrared sensors so they can find the intruding aircraft and then they can attack it be it a bomber or an aircraft.

Iran and Yemenis must think of how usa finds out about the bunker positions and how to carry some equipment to new locations as the bunker positions are gradually found out by israel-usa. By intel or by satellite pictures they seem to find possible locations of bunkers. But they still need to get close by planes to bomb the bunkers. Cruise missiles wont do the job it seems as they risked B2s to do it.


Passive radar is another item that has future in my opinion. It can use cheap fm transmitters as illuminators and catch targets while passive radar is hiding far away from those illuminators. Even if fm transmitters are hit. They can be replaced easily and won't cost loss of personnel as well. Ofcourse transmitters and the passive radar should still be protected by shorads and similar systems nearby eventhough transmitters are more numereous and survivable than active radar and passive component is more stealthy. Also fm transmitter locations should be changed periodically and rapidly.

No need to launch sams by using this radar. Passive radar will be for search-scanning and give estimated-rough areas for other tracking systems to take over and search-track targets more throughly. IIR electro-optical trackers + laser-radar rangefinder will take over after rough estimates are made. These will track targets and guide the surface to air missiles.


 
Last edited:
.
There are also reports that israel attacked weapons depots Latakia Syria. Yes Tartus port can bu used by Iran to transfer weapons like surface to air missiles to Syria and then Labennon but it is not an intelligent move to not to take precautions after that. There are obviously many foreign agents in Syria just like in Labennon, Maybe some government officials or maybe inside the Syrian or even Russian personnel or even some Iranian personnel who knows. If you dont consider this possibility ofcourse the weapons depot will be destroyed.

Also previous israeli bombing of Iranian commander in Damascus was a similar mistake disregarding foreign intel agents. The meeting could have been made in a safe bunker as israeli planes cannot get close to Damascus but launch popeye from long ranges so they cant drop bunker buster bombs in Damascus unless they gain air control like in Beirut. Also if Iranian short range mobile sam systems were transferred before they could have shot down more cruise missiles as point defense than Syrian ad that protects large areas.

After the weapons are stored in a weapons depot in Syria, isreal getting the intel about the location of the depot immediately strikes there with popeye cruise missiles. A few can be brought down by Syrian air defense but it is not enough to protect a static position.


Always calculate that the place of your weapons depot is known by the enemy. For example surface to air missiles. After it is transferred to Tartus port for example short range surface to air missiles(ciws types can be beneficial too. ciws-cram can be in theory effective against bunker buster bombs, jdams as well) that can shoot down popeye cruise missiles should be mobile after they land in Tartus and immediately deployed around the place you want to protect from israeli popeye attacks. That is they should transfer to areas immediately and deploy there protecting the area of initial weapons storage facilities near Latakia-Tartus and also undisclosed weapons depots deep inside Syria.

If it is rockets, tactical bms or similar there should be very little time after it is loaded to the depot around Latakia and then almost immediately they should be taken away from there to other undisclosed locations(protected by Iranian short range air defense mentioned before). Smaller depots separated apart are better than large single depots as all items are less likely to be targeted at the same time in that case. Then gradually all items can be transferred to Hezbollah and Syrian-Iraqi resistance fighters in that region.
 
Last edited:
.
Both Hezbollah and Iraqi drone strikes are getting more effective. The jet engine drones like Shahed-238 seem to have lower rcs than Shahed-136 types. These types of drones when launched at max altitudes like 5km is very difficult to detect by ground radars. Just like TB-2 drone was very difficult to be detected by ground radars in previous conflicts because it flies about 6-7kms altitude with a small-sleek airframe although the propeller is visible to radar from those ranges it gets very difficult to detect it.


Bottom side should be flat and preferrably micro-jet engine powered flying from 5+km altitude would overcome israeli radars. If it flies low on a flat terrain it can be detected from 2-3kms by short range air defence radars regardless of any rcs shape but from higher altitudes these drones can penetrate much better. Shahed-136 is still good if it flies at higher altitudes but new variants can be made with same propeller engine staying above the fusalage not directly behind the fuselage so bottom side would be totally flat and hides some of the propeller section from ground radars reducing its rcs against ground radars. Propeller engine above fuselage can be detected by airborne radars but still since the engines are very small it is still difficult for airborne radars to precisely detect them and more difficult to alert ground defences or aircraft against their positions. Maybe for early warning they can detect something is coming.

Basicly if the wing position is not at the center of the body but below the body as low wing configuration and the shape of the body above the wing is not a cylinder shape but trapezoid cross section or triangle cross section it would be more stealthy than shahed-136. Propeller can be at the same position behind the body but large triangle wing below the body would hide it from the ground based radars.

An example about engine position above the wing is this kamikaze drone. Engine is exposed outside but it is above the wing body fuselage. So it is aimed for making less detectable to ground radars. Also wingtip stabilisers are above the wing not at the center of the wing. There are less right angles for ground radars to see.


Yemen can take some portion of the ballsitic missiles and station them on trucks as moving platforms. They should continiously move the bm trucks to not to be targeted but that is still an option after bunker locations are detected. Also the missiles would be ready to launch when found necessary as well.
 
Last edited:
.
A PHOTO FOR THE HISTORY BOOKSMEA airline landing in "Beirut"
International Airport as Israeli rains fire on the airport.
1729493445428.jpeg
 
.
Israeli army is losing moral and soldiers are in rebellion - Israeli HamakomThe Israeli media quoted several Israeli soldiers who explained why they refused to continue fighting 'We're sitting ducks on a shooting range. We don't understand what we're doing here''The hostages don't come back and it feels like the soldiers keep getting injured and dying along the way. It all seems pointless''I don't know what army they're thinking of going into Lebanon with, because there is no army. I'm not going back to the battalion'

1729498579717.jpeg
 
.
Fars news agency citing an informed source: At least 3 Isareli F-35 jets were destroyed in operation "True Promise 2"The missiles used to target the 3 Israeli airbase were Emad, Qadr, Khaybar Shekan and Fatah 1 missiles.
1729505655177.jpeg
 
. .
Hezbollah just published a video liquidating 8 ZIONIST SOLDIERS at once

Nice hit. Looks like an fpv quadcopter drone. These can be assembled-produced in 1000s within a small amount of time and very effective. Attack against vehicles and personnel inside them work best with rpg-quadcopter but for attacking personnel outside the score can be higher with fragmentation anti-personnel rpg or dropping grenades from above.
 
Last edited:
. .
IDF air strikes targeted the Port of Ouzai, Lebanon with a massive explosion!

1729586905870.jpeg
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom