revived rafidi, is obviously not British, guess three times from where he is?
Hint: his Mullah hypocrisy might give it away..
I do happen to be british but I like to leave my national identity out at forum door before entering, we are all the same, this title as Turksih, Syrian, Paksitani, Saudi, Iranain, british are man given, we all have a right to have opinion and discuss what we see as important and be critical of what we think is wrong with public figures who make decision that effects direclty or indirectly.
Any single loss of life be it muslim or non mulim is troubling and any Zalim (Oppressor) should be held accountable irrespective of if they wear the hat of Erdogan, Assad, Qataris, Saudis or for that matter Mosri. I have visited the countires these people present (include azerbijan) and seen how syria was living in peace before the war. Using military force, voilence and terrorism is no solution to economic harship.
These all are war criminals just like Omar Al-bshir who sacrificed innocent lives of thier own countries gains and of interferring with other countries (Erdogan in case of Syria) for their worldly interests, it does not make them right or justifies their invasions. My question was to ask what gives this Erdogan the right to forge economic ties with the so called 'turkish speaking allegience' where as at the same time he helps to destroy the neighbouring syria's economy by assisting to bring the terrorsits and ammunition from all around the world to destroy and slaughter innocent chirstians, muslims, others in syria.
So my question to my 'turksih' friends is what Erdogan has done for Islam if he represents Islam, and whats he all about? why is he trying to do by helping to economically destroy syria, help kill its habitants. Is the blood of syrian childeren, women, men not the same value as the 'turkish' blood in azerbijan, turkey, turkmanistan etc? Is livelyhood of syrian massess not as important as the turkish livelyhood?