Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan acknowledged as traitor or not?

[Marwat Khan Lodhi]

yeh Indians call him frontier gandhi and you are thinking its ISI conpiracy to use that word in one line reference to bacha khan in school book.

Innocent pakistani kids are taught that gandhi was evil and devilish hindu...so any one related to gandhi is considered evil too...text book and people like you use "frontier gandhi" like title as ultimate gaali as for you people gandhi was ultimate evil, while i consider it an honourable title as mahtma gandhi was very great person.

 

[nana41]

You must have been very poor student in Pakistan studies subject, Go check topic role of NWFP in Pakistan movement, he is mentioned there.

And so are MIR JAFFER & MIR SADIQ.

 

[Marwat Khan Lodhi]

in the name of autonomy he wanted power only for his own family.

He was against creation of Pakistan.

Lol it seems some one has assigned you mission of spreading propaganda against him, you always come up with funny stuff about him.

And so are MIR JAFFER & MIR SADIQ.

Why you are mentioning those two shias to me?

 

[Srinivas]

in the name of autonomy he wanted power only for his own family.

He was against creation of Pakistan.

Considering the modest life he lived

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

evil shias.....

 

[Spring Onion]

Innocent pakistani kids are taught that gandhi was evil and devilish hindu...so any one related to gandhi is considered evil too...text book and people like you use "frontier gandhi" like title as ultimate gaali as for you people gandhi was ultimate evil, while i consider it an honourable title as mahtma gandhi was very great person.

bwahahhahhahaha the indian innocent kids unfortunately grow older and call Gandhi names which by the way we Pakistanis dont call him.


oh by the way no one is taught that Gandhi was evil. i havent been taught anything like that.

Considering the modest life he lived

yeh bacha khan used to wear dhoti as well

 

[Spring Onion]

Lol it seems some one has assigned you mission of spreading propaganda against him, you always come up with funny stuff about him.



Why you are mentioning those two shias to me?

infact you are here with a propaganda to come up with some of your complexes. When ANP his grandsons dont have time for talking about him you are bent upon propagating about him that too without study.

please go and study before accusing me of anything.

he was not even democratic to least that he refused to accept internal party elections and wanted his son to be elected

 

[Bratva]

Bacha Khan a.k.a Khan Abdul Ghaffar khan,,, If he had any Ghairat, he would not have elected on the ticket of Congress a.k.a hindu tickets? Where was his Muslim and Pathan ghairat that he refused a muslim party ticket and chose to remain loyal to hindus?

Luffy Sahab,,, Ek pathan ho kar Hinduo kay talway chatay Bacha khan na,,, Afsous!

Jinnah had more Ghairat than Bacha khan, that he never made comprimes with Congressi leaders and he remained a true muslim and fulfilled his promise to make a new home for Muslims.

 

[Srinivas]

yeh bacha khan used to wear dhoti as well

Jinnah called for autonomy for Sub continent muslims, further split India. Bacha Khan called for autonomy for his people , But was demonized by the same people who called for partition.

Get your perception right in both cases the two guys behaved the same, one is considered a traitor but the other is considered as a Quaid.

With age one has to unlearn things studied in childhood and view the world with reasoning and based on facts.

 

[Spring Onion]

Jinnah called for autonomy for Sub continent muslims, further split India. Bacha Khan called for autonomy for his people , But was demonized by the same people who called for partition.

Get your perception right in both cases the two guys behaved the same, one is considered a traitor but the other is considered as a Quaid.

With age one has to unlearn things studied in childhood and view the world with reasoning and based on facts.

))) oh really ? Then why you Indians hate Jinnah for creating Pakistan? afterall he wanted autonomy for his people why you dint give him Bharat Ratna?

 

[Bratva]

Jinnah called for autonomy for Sub continent muslims, further split India. Bacha Khan called for autonomy for his people , But was demonized by the same people who called for partition.

Get your perception right in both cases the two guys behaved the same, one is considered a traitor but the other is considered as a Quaid.

With age one has to unlearn things studied in childhood and view the world with reasoning and based on facts.

Since you know more about Bacha khan,, could you explain autonomy of what kind?

 

[Srinivas]

))) oh really ? Then why you Indians hate Jinnah for creating Pakistan? afterall he wanted autonomy for his people why you dint give him Bharat Ratna?

Indians never call Jinnah as a traitor. We read Jinnah as a Muslim league leader during the movement for independence.

Regarding Bharat Ratna this award will be given to people who have done great service to India.

Since you know more about Bacha khan,, could you explain autonomy of what kind?

He only asked for Pashtunistan administrative unit inside Pakistan.

 

[Spring Onion]

Indians never call Jinnah as a traitor. We read Jinnah as a Muslim league leader during the movement for independence.

Regarding Bharat Ratna this award will be given to people who have done great service to India.

Mr. Bacha Khan did great services to bharat not Pakistan.

he was traitor to Pakistan who opposed creation of Pakistan, Jinnah did not opposed independence to India.

simple logic.

Since you know more about Bacha khan,, could you explain autonomy of what kind?

He was against creation of Pakistan once Pakistan created and he was backstabbed by Indians, mr bacha khan then turned to Pakistan but at the same time dint refrain from creating unrest in Pakistan

 

[Bratva]

Indians never call Jinnah as a traitor. We read Jinnah as a Muslim league leader during the movement for independence.

Regarding Bharat Ratna this award will be given to people who have done great service to India.



He only asked for Pashtunistan administrative unit inside Pakistan.

Why giving a half truth? He only asked that unit after he failed to create a separate Pashtunistan country despite NWFP vote to join Pakistan. A traitor word can not be trusted. Who ever committed treason with Pakistan, Nature took it's revenge from him. Biggest example is of mujeeb

 

[Srinivas]

Mr. Bacha Khan did great services to bharat not Pakistan.

he was traitor to Pakistan who opposed creation of Pakistan, Jinnah did not opposed independence to India.

simple logic.

This perception of yours is because you people read in history that "Pakistan gained Independence from Hindu dominated Bharat".

Truth is Both gained Independence from British and Jinnah wanted a separate Pakistan and so partition was done to British India.

Bacha Khan at that time a Pro Congress Leader and was a firm believer in Gandhian principles opposed Pakistan since he feared for the rights of his people.

He raised the slogan for Separate administrative unit for Pashtuns called Pashtunistan after formation of Pakistan. To Make sure his people are well treated based on Provincial autonomy.

Why giving a half truth? He only asked that unit after he failed to create a separate Pashtunistan country despite NWFP vote to join Pakistan. A traitor word can not be trusted. Who ever committed treason with Pakistan, Nature took it's revenge from him. Biggest example is of mujeeb

You cannot name traitor to anyone who is of Bacha Khan stature. Those insecure Pakistani Leaders worried about NWFP since majority of people voted for Congress. So they simply labelled him as a traitor.