Advaitagrata
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
- Messages
- 897
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
We were talking about personal freedom and personal rights, you jumped to morality and sin??? Ha ha... Keep on change the goal post man... Truth is that lower caste women in Kerala are denied to cover their breast in 1800s... They rioted 50 years for getting the right to cover their bare chest... That riot is called " Maru marakkal samaram" or Channar revolt...
We are talking about Law and order.
The Law was common for everybody and that was, those with higher social status was taxed for it, those who wore jewellery was taxed for that, those who inherited property got taxed at 25% for that.
In return, the law demanded that those who had higher social status by either paying more taxes or due to their duties to the kingdom be respected by those who had lower social status.
Many of the laws were unfair, but this was not one of them.
Uncovering the upper body was always a sign of respect in south India , sri lanka and southeast asia. This was later enforced by Law.
The Law became UNJUST after the christian Diwan John monreo gave special permission for christian women who converted to have higher social status, just by converting to Christianity. This was combined by waving off their taxes which every other people of higher social status paid.
This was done to encourage conversions into christianity and soon Avana dalits started converting and claiming higher social status.
THIS INEQUALITY before the law based on Religion was the reason for the Riot. This blatent bigotry started the riots.
It was the christians who instigated the riots by humiliating the Hindu women. Let there be no doubt about this fact.
When the ezhava and Nadar women who used to be upper caste, then wanted the same social status as the dalit Christians, that was denied by the law under the christian diwan John Munreo.
They then started to wear the status symbol illegally without paying the tax and this made the Nairs angry since they were paying the tax for their superior social status. The Nairs protested this act and things got violent.
We can thus see that this whole thing was engineered by the christian diwan John monreo to encourage conversion.
That is why BEFORE John Monreo became diwan, there was NO RIOTS.
Its funny how modern history now blame the king and paints the british christian john monrea as the good guy.
Such is the magic of chrislamist and communist.