What's new

Keeping India out of Pakistan-Bangladesh relations

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
-5
Keeping India out of Pakistan-Bangladesh relations
Atrocities committed by Pakistani military were only part of its response to vicious atrocities committed by Awami League activists. The response had become an inevitable action


Col (R) Muhammad Hanif

MARCH 7, 2018

https://dailytimes.com.pk/211364/keeping-india-pakistan-bangladesh-relations/

Pakistan and Bangladesh share a bitter past. They were one country and before 1971 and got separated in a painful and bloody war.

In December 1971, the then Eastern Wing of Pakistan separated from the Western Wing due to political differences that emerged after 1971 general elections.

The then Awami League leaders and activists were incited and misled by India to conspire against the Pakistan’s central government and galvanized them to launch a guerrilla war against the Pakistani military.

It is now abundantly clear that the separation of East Pakistan was a result of Awami League’s guerilla war against Pakistani military, which was engineered by India. India also did not shy away from launching a direct military aggression against Pakistan in December 1971.

This fact became even more confirmed and clearer when Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi admitted during his visit to Bangladesh that India played an important role in the break-up of Pakistan.

But despite these substantial proofs, the Awami League led governments in Bangladesh have always accused Pakistani military of committing atrocities against Bengalis.

Awami League deliberately ignores the fact that in 1971, its own activists were committing atrocities at a large scale against fellow Bengalis who opposed the idea of a separate Bengali nation. Those who were against Pakistan’s break-up were brutally killed by Awami League’s activists.

In order to cover up its own war crimes, Awami League has held several unfair trials of Jamat-e-Islami for their alleged war crimes in 1971. The party has also executed Jamat-e-Islami leaders.

Pakistan and Bangladesh share a bitter past. They were one country and before 1971 and got separated in a painful and bloody war.

In December 1971, the then Eastern Wing of Pakistan separated from the Western Wing due to political differences that emerged after 1971 general elections.

The then Awami League leaders and activists were incited and misled by India to conspire against the Pakistan’s central government and galvanized them to launch a guerrilla war against the Pakistani military.

It is now abundantly clear that the separation of East Pakistan was a result of Awami League’s guerilla war against Pakistani military, which was engineered by India. India also did not shy away from launching a direct military aggression against Pakistan in December 1971.

This fact became even more confirmed and clearer when Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi admitted during his visit to Bangladesh that India played an important role in the break-up of Pakistan.

But despite these substantial proofs, the Awami League led governments in Bangladesh have always accused Pakistani military of committing atrocities against Bengalis.

Awami League deliberately ignores the fact that in 1971, its own activists were committing atrocities at a large scale against fellow Bengalis who opposed the idea of a separate Bengali nation. Those who were against Pakistan’s break-up were brutally killed by Awami League’s activists.

In order to cover up its own war crimes, Awami League has held several unfair trials of Jamat-e-Islami for their alleged war crimes in 1971. The party has also executed Jamat-e-Islami leaders.



Atrocities committed by Pakistani military were only part of its response to vicious atrocities committed by Awami League activists. The response had become an inevitable action.

In any case, since 1971, India and the Awami league governments have been jointly organising propagandist programs to create and maintain hatred among the people of Bangladesh and Pakistan.

This includes many projects, such as setting up of the war museum, exchange of wartime documents, Indian army soldiers’ mausoleum, making documentaries and feature films and issue of postal stamps. In this regard, India has recently circulated a movie via Youtube showing 1971 war events, boasting self-proclaimed superiority of the Indian military.

Pak-Bang.jpg


Due to India’s above mentioned propaganda and its lobbying against Pakistan, Awami League has adopted a permanent hostile stance against Pakistan. Since Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and governments of other parties were more pragmatic about 1971 events, BD’s relations with Pakistan had progressed considerably under the governments of Ziaur Rahman, Begum Khaldia Zia, and Hossain Mohammad Ershad in Bangladesh, who had maintained distance from India. Five Pakistani heads of government have made official visits to Bangladesh since the 1980s and numerous trade and cultural agreements have been signed. Trade between the two countries currently stands at $340 million, which is ‘negligible’.

In 1985, Pakistani President Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq visited the Bangladeshi war memorial, and said, ‘Your heroes are our heroes’. Bangladeshi President Ershad also visited Islamabad in 1986.

Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wajid visited Pakistan in 1998 and, Pakistani General Pervez Musharraf visited Bangladesh in July 2002, including the war memorial and said, ‘Your brothers and sisters in Pakistan share the pain of the events of 1971’.

It is important for both countries to forget their bitter past, shun India’s role and develop mutually beneficial relations to improve their economies

But in the changed geopolitical and strategic environment around South Asia and with emerging economic opportunities, it is important for both Pakistan and Bangladesh to forget about their bitter past, shun India’s spoiler role and develop mutually beneficial relations with each other to improve their economies and wellbeing of their people.

In this context, it would be wise if Sheikh Hussina Wajid also forgets the bitter past, shuns India’s spoiler role, and endeavours to improve BD’s relations with Pakistan and Bangladesh should join the CPEC to exploit vast trade opportunities within South Asia, with West Asia, the Central Asian Republics, China and Russia.

The writer is an ex Army officer and a former Research Fellow, Islamabad Policy Research Institute (IPRI), Islamabad

Published in Daily Times, March 7th2018.
 
. . . .
yep , like an acrimonious divorce both parties need to get over it , stop reminiscing about the past and move on. India behaved like the lecherous adulterous :calculating, Manipulative and Psychopathic.
"It's not our fault. We can't help it. They started it."

indians did what they had to do ....bangladesh and Pakistan should have gone seperate ways soon after 1947
 
. . .
indians did what they had to do ....bangladesh and Pakistan should have gone seperate ways soon after 1947

Well, perhaps you are right on the second point: Suhrawardy, Sarat Bose (Netaji's brother) and Kiron Shankar Roy tried for that in 47. Jinnah was so exasperated that he told them to do whatever they liked; Nehru and Patel threw the then equivalent of a hissy fit. That plan bombed.

As for Indians doing what they had to do, believe me, the picture was quite different from inside. I am surprised at how many Pakistanis think that India was just waiting for a chance to break up Pakistan. Some Indians do think that way; we are 1.2 billion strong, so just count how many retards even 1% of that would be. But nobody responsible or sane or balanced, or all three, would wish that. Full democracy, without interference from an institution that should be completely subject to civilian control, yes; break-up, no.
 
. .
Well, perhaps you are right on the second point: Suhrawardy, Sarat Bose (Netaji's brother) and Kiron Shankar Roy tried for that in 47. Jinnah was so exasperated that he told them to do whatever they liked; Nehru and Patel threw the then equivalent of a hissy fit. That plan bombed.

As for Indians doing what they had to do, believe me, the picture was quite different from inside. I am surprised at how many Pakistanis think that India was just waiting for a chance to break up Pakistan. Some Indians do think that way; we are 1.2 billion strong, so just count how many retards even 1% of that would be. But nobody responsible or sane or balanced, or all three, would wish that. Full democracy, without interference from an institution that should be completely subject to civilian control, yes; break-up, no.

many people dont know the history in a way that should be known ....

Jinnah and Jamat islami bangal were in agreement that once we get freedom from british rule after 1947 then we will go seperate ways. but why it didnt go that way i dont know ...
 
.
Well Pakistan have no such bharat problem with bangladesh. Haseena should stop hanging old politicians in the name of Pakistan. Pakistan never demanded anything from Bangladesh other then this.
 
.
many people dont know the history in a way that should be known ....

Jinnah and Jamat islami bangal were in agreement that once we get freedom from british rule after 1947 then we will go seperate ways. but why it didnt go that way i dont know ...

Good point.

My best guess: At THAT point of time, I don't think that Bangladesh (as it is today) had quite the bandwidth of leadership that was needed. Remember, other than Jinnah, even in the west, the leadership took time to grow.

What do you think?

Not that Fazlul Haq Sahib or Suhrawardy were push-overs, or Maulana Bhashani or a baby Mujib could be discounted.
 
.
Good point.

My best guess: At THAT point of time, I don't think that Bangladesh (as it is today) had quite the bandwidth of leadership that was needed. Remember, other than Jinnah, even in the west, the leadership took time to grow.

What do you think?

Not that Fazlul Haq Sahib or Suhrawardy were push-overs, or Maulana Bhashani or a baby Mujib could be discounted.

I have a zero idea who was the leader in east Pakistan but i know that unitedly we fought to establish an independent country and later we could have better arrangements and better way of going in different directions ...

Religion is a powerful tool and a must identity for any state but it is not enough to glue the different races. a better political system could have worked well but selfishness came forward above all
 
.
Not that Fazlul Haq Sahib or Suhrawardy were push-overs, or Maulana Bhashani or a baby Mujib could be discounted.
Actually those men were behind of what made Jinnah of what he became eventually.Remember, before 1946, Muslim league had not much power base outside of Bengal and Uttar Pradesh. But in Uttar Pradesh, muslim league was a party of a minority.Never had any chance to come to power or influence the govt. policy. Only in Bengal, it represented the majority community and was in power. As Bengal was the biggest and most influential province (political+economical), hosting largest number of muslims, so it's ruling Muslim league party got the vital legitimacy to claim the representative of Indian muslim. Upon which Muslim league negotiated with the British and Congress and eventually won Pakistan. Can you imagine, the Punjab province of Pakistan, which currently set the parameter of who are patriotic Pakistani and who are not, elected Congress+Unionist party in to power as late as 1946 election? So what would have happened if Muslim League had not much a support base in Bengal ?
 
Last edited:
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom