What's new

Keeping India out of Pakistan-Bangladesh relations

. .
I'm sure it does. You are the best judge of livestock and animals. You know what they say, it takes one to know one.

Not really, one does have to be one to know one.

Im a farmer n we do keep dogs... so I know your kind.
Are you talking about the massive Hindu plot called Direct Action Day? When the Chief Minister addressed a crowd and said that Hindus had better watch out? And when the 'direct action' started immediately after the speech even before the gathering had dispersed? When the Hindus, who had plotted all this so carefully, were slaughtered by the unprepared, unready Muslims, who reached out their hands and found them miraculously filled with swords and knives and steel staves? All brought to them in trucks, nothing less, no passing around by hand. When the Chief Minister, after his speech, went and sat in the police Control Room and allowed no intervention, until the second day, when the retaliation began?

Terrible, these monsters: Bagal mein chhuri aur muh mein Ram Ram.

Serves them right that others learnt from them and beat them at this game.

And, of course, Bengali to a man; as Bengalis notoriously do, they spoke perfect Urdu.




And so was Tikka Khan, natch.

So now we know. All those misguided little innocents, several divisions of them, fell for the machinations of this handful of exotics. "They did it first, and besides, I wasn't even there that day."

Have you thought of joining the RSS? You have this knack of picking out the right bits from history, and of serving them up in a tasteful fashion. You'd go straight to the top.
Dont give a fk .. now piss off u fart.

But he was born to a Punjabi family and Haryana was Punjab then.So he was a Punjabi from Punjab.
Do you know what language is spoken in haryana? Definitely not Panjabi.

Are the Haryanvis panjabi? Definitely not..

Is haryana part of Pak today? And did Liaqat Ali Khan gain anything from 47? Nope!

He was assassinated by an afghan in Rawalpindi.
 
.
Not really, one does have to be one to know one.

Im a farmer n we do keep dogs... so I know your kind.

Dont give a fk .. now piss off u fart.


Do you know what language is spoken in haryana? Definitely not Panjabi.

Are the Haryanvis panjabi? Definitely not..

Is haryana part of Pak today? And did Liaqat Ali Khan gain anything from 47? Nope!

He was assassinated by an afghan in Rawalpindi.

LOL.

Ran out of ideas already? Poor little farmer boy.
 
.
So, please re-write history that is being created in your of your own fertile brain. History deals with what has already been unfurled in the past. But, you are talking about writing an imaginary story what could have happened instead of history. Can you really change the truth of history? You are just another ingrate who deny history where the Bangali Muslims contributed most.

LOL - What I said are the fact without any sugar coating and Muslim Ummah topping. Tell me which part is re-writing history?
 
.
WRONG. Muslim League won the election in Punjab in 1946.



The 1946 Punjab Elections, by Ian Talbot,

The Muslim League won in Sindh as well in 1946.
Of course not. Unionist party, congress and Akali dal formed coalition govt. in Punjab after 1946 election.Check your history lesson again.

Sindh was a small, minor province of 4 million people then.It did not had any substantial impact on all India politics.Compare this with Bengal with 70 million people, Punjab with 35 million people or United Province with almost 50 million people.These were the crucial provinces.
 
.
Of course not. Unionist party, congress and Akali dal formed coalition govt. in Punjab after 1946 election.Check your history lesson again.

Sindh was a small, minor province of 4 million people then.It did not had any substantial impact on all India politics.Compare this with Bengal with 70 million people, Punjab with 35 million people or United Province with almost 50 million people.These were the crucial provinces.

We are talking about the Muslim League being able to position itself as the representative of the Muslims of British India. The Muslim League won 75 of the 85 seats reserved for Muslims in the Punjab in the 1946 elections. If you have a problem with this fact then take it up with Professor Ian Talbot of Southampton University.

British & Congress didn't accepted ML as representative of Muslims of All India until the Punjab and Sindh extended it support. Frontier provinces of Indian Subcontinent were bound to go separate way with or without support of Bengalis.

They have been so thoroughly brainwashed it is mind blowing haha! Muslim League failed to win in Bengal as well in 1937. How casually he glosses of this fact lol
 
. .
Do you know what language is spoken in haryana? Definitely not Panjabi.

Are the Haryanvis panjabi? Definitely not..

Is haryana part of Pak today? And did Liaqat Ali Khan gain anything from 47? Nope!

He was assassinated by an afghan in Rawalpindi.
Hindi is dominant language in Haryana but Liaqaut was born to a Punjabi speaking family which was then part of Punjab.He consider himself Punjabi not mohajir. End of the discussion.
Is haryana part of Pak today? And did Liaqat Ali Khan gain anything from 47? Nope!
So if any Punjabi born outside of Punjabi speaking region, he is not a Punjabi? HS Suhrawardy was born in current west Bengal, so he was not an East Pakistani? By your logic HS Suhrawardy is an Indian.

Liaqual Ali was an important Muslim League leader and PM Pakistan. Isn't it significant?
 
.
Guys talking about history....

You know the best part of history? A Super Power Army made the largest surrender(that too unconditional) in history since WW2.

The Irony is they accuse us of obsessing over Pakistan...when in reality it's them who can't accept their fate. Earlier this year Nawaz spoke about Bangladesh and 71. Then their foreign minister blamed Bangladesh of sabotaging SAARC. And this article this article from a Pakistani paper. But blame all on Hasina.

Pakistanis have some serious issues. No matter what they can't take responsibility it seems. It's always someone else's fault. Blame America the former best buddy, blame Afghanistan the neighbor and brotherly Muslim nation, blame India the neighbor and reason of butt hurt and blame Bangladesh because they surrender.....It's always someone else's fault. They perhaps should move their country to a different planet. Since everyone screws them.
 
.
They have been so thoroughly brainwashed it is mind blowing haha! Muslim League failed to win in Bengal as well in 1937. How casually he glosses of this fact lol
Muslim league formed coalition govt. in Bengal with A.K Fazul Haque's Krishak-Proja Party after 1937 election. Muslim league was the 2nd biggest political party in Bengal after Congress in 1937. Muslim league along with 3rd largest Krishak -proja party formed govt. denying the opportunity to Congress in 1937.Muslim league was in power in Bengal almost uninterruptedly from 1937 to 1954, first 4 years as a coalition partner and the later 11 year unilaterally.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_Bengal
 
Last edited:
.
many people dont know the history in a way that should be known ....

Jinnah and Jamat islami bangal were in agreement that once we get freedom from british rule after 1947 then we will go seperate ways. but why it didnt go that way i dont know ...

Where from you guys get this history lesson o_O
Jamat Islami wasnt in favor of partition or independence of Pakistan for that matter. And Jamat were non existent in Bengal. Maulana Moududi who wasnt in favor of Pakistan was in bitter conflict with West Pakistanis for larger part of his life. From West Pakistan this alien party entered in Bengal. The top leader of Bengal Jamaat Ghulam Azam was against Urdu imposition in Bengal initially, before getting brainwashed by alien ideology of Moududi. This is really sad how people of our area got divided and affected due to Pakistan era.
 
.
Muslim league formed coalition govt. in Bengal with A.K Fazul Haque's Krishak-Proja Party after 1937 election.Later in 1939, AK. Fazlul Haque himself joined Muslim league by merging Krishak-Proja party with Muslim Leaque thus making Muslim League the biggest political force in Bengal. Muslim league was in power in Bengal uninterruptedly from 1937 to 1954, first 2 years as a coalition partner and the rest 15 year unilaterally. Please read some history before exposing your ignorance.

Doesnt change anything regarding the Muslim League being able to represent itself as political party of the Muslims.

"While by 1946 the Muslim League could rightly claim to speak for Muslims of the subcontinent, winning 425 of the 496 seats reserved for the Muslims"

From Midnight to Glorious Morning?: India Since Independence, Mihir Bose

"The Muslim League won 425 of the 496 seats reserved for Muslims"

The Army and Democracy, Aqil Shah

The Muslim League won the Muslim election (vote) from Bengal, Punjab, Sindh (as already shown) and the rest of British India. Bengali nationalists giving themselves undue extra credit is the falsification of history going on here that I am contradicting. Did Bengal play an important part in Pakistan's creation? Sure. Was it the only player involved? By no means yes.
 
.
fact is that (1) marginalized and oppressed Bengali Muslims had no option other than supporting Muslim League while same was not the case with Muslims of western frontier. (2) ML got power and recognized as representative of Muslims of all India only when Muslims of western frontier gave support. (3) Once we decided to have Pakistan (The word itself coined by Punjabi and stands for Punjab, Afghania, Kashmir, Sindh & Baluchistan) we got it within years. (4) Without support of people of today's Pakistan there wouldn't have been any Pakistan because you people were struggling to get Quotas and representation not the country.
However you try you are not going to change history in the PDF. Muslim League was formed in Dhaka by Nawab Salimullah in a conference in 1912 where all other Muslim leaders of the then India participated.

The nomenclature, PAKISTAN, had no value to the present Pakistanis when Pakistan movement itself could not take root in the present Pakistan. It was led by the Bengali Muslims. The word Pakistan was formed by first thinking the two words Pak (meaning pure/clean) and stan (meaning land). "i" was added at a later time for easy pronunciation. Learn history.

It only meant to be the land of the pure people of the subcontinent, i.e. the Muslims. Chowdhury Rahmatullah explained it in the way you described it. But, your people were not interested in forming Pakistan. Not a single Provincial Capitals, Lahore, Peshwar, Quetta and Karachi had a ML govt. But, Calcutta had. Learn history before you vomit your ignorance.

And do not please talk about marginalization of Bengali Muslims. How many years the Sikh Ranjit Singh and his descendants ruled over and marginalized the Muslims in Punjab? Muslims were landless peasants in Punjab. Similar things did not happen in Bengal. It was the Muslims of Bengal who ruled over Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand and Orissa since 1203 CE. Read history and do not vomit your kindergarten history.
 
.
Hindi is dominant language in Haryana but Liaqaut was born to a Punjabi speaking family which was then part of Punjab.He consider himself Punjabi not mohajir. End of the discussion.

So if any Punjabi born outside of Punjabi speaking region, he is not a Punjabi? HS Suhrawardy was born in current west Bengal, so he was not an East Pakistani? By your logic HS Suhrawardy is an Indian.

Liaqual Ali was an important Muslim League leader and PM Pakistan. Isn't it significant?
Because he wasnt Panjabi? Because he didnt speak Panjabi?

And because he spoke urdu and took care of urdu speaking refugees ... he was accused of being biased.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom