What's new

Keeping India out of Pakistan-Bangladesh relations

.
You probably do not know that the Zaminaries in the Hindu majority western Bengal were awarded to the Muslims during British time. The Muslim majority Eastern Bengal Zamindaries were given to the Hindus. Apart from this basic policy of the British, the other point is the Mughal policy in Bengal was to award Zamindaries mostly to Hindus. So, many Hindus were already Zamindars before the British came.

There were not many Muslim Zamindars even during the Muslim Mughal period. What Hindu Babus and Muslim generals did in 1757 is a different story. And 1757 is not when the Permanent Settlement was introduced. It was 36 years after in 1793. Many Hindu Zamindaries were also taken over by their employee Hindu Nayebs and Mahajan class people etc. during the PS.

Certainly, not all Hindus were Zamindars, but many were educated and were employed in the British govt service. So, in total, their positions were uplifted during British rule. If the normal Hindus were land holder, it was also true that the Muslims were also owned their own land. Muslims were certainly not landless peasants, although we loved to say it as a slogan in the Pakistan Movement. Go to Registry Offices and collect some CS and RS Khatians to know the reality instead of slogans.

I do not follow the Scripts written by Professor K. Ali. He did no research. I do not also follow the Bangla pedia written by some one who write things without giving any reference from the old texts.

Talk from statistics not from your own guts. The biggest Jamindar of Bengal was the Nawab of Dhaka but that did not make any difference. And not that Muslim were awarded Jamindari in west Bengal, they were mainly the remnants of Mogul awarded Jaigirs from Murshidabad. British found it convenient to collect taxes from an established system. It was just the coincidence but no grand design.

And yes it was 36 years after 1757 when People lost their land to Chirostaye Bondobosto. And it was almost entirely gone to Hindu Jamindars. And what education you talking about? It was only the privilege class means Jamindar started educating themselves to run their show. A muslim could not get admitted to Presidency College even if he wanted to. You know nothing.
 
. .
Pakistanis will never accept that bengali muslims played biggest role creating Pakistan.:disagree:
Their politics is even more biased than ours. And another thing bothers me is that their cosy relationship with sikhs. Sikhs killed most number of muslims during partition. Whole east punjab is almost muslim free now.
 
. .
Yawns.

Pakistanis will never accept that bengali muslims played biggest role creating Pakistan.:disagree:
Their politics is even more biased than ours. And another thing bothers me is that their cosy relationship with sikhs. Sikhs killed most number of muslims during partition. Whole east punjab is almost muslim free now.

Heard of the word. Munafiqun? Describes them well.
 
.
Talk from statistics not from your own guts. The biggest Jamindar of Bengal was the Nawab of Dhaka but that did not make any difference. And not that Muslim were awarded Jamindari in west Bengal, they were mainly the remnants of Mogul awarded Jaigirs from Murshidabad. British found it convenient to collect taxes from an established system. It was just the coincidence but no grand design.

And yes it was 36 years after 1757 when People lost their land to Chirostaye Bondobosto. And it was almost entirely gone to Hindu Jamindars. And what education you talking about? It was only the privilege class means Jamindar started educating themselves to run their show. A muslim could not get admitted to Presidency College even if he wanted to. You know nothing.
You are talking as if all the Zamindaries in east Bengal were owned by the Muslims. You are an expert of making TAL out of TIL and distorting facts to make them fictions. Stop sending trashes that says almost nothing. In many of your sentences, you talk the same thing that I said before, but with a different tone as if I said something opposite and you are trying to put an argument against my saying. Stop wasting your time by making circular argument that i see in many of your posts.
 
Last edited:
.
@bluesky what is up with you brother? You're picking fights with everyone around here. You picked a fight with me too sometime back - I stopped talking to you after that.

People will have different opinions - it's okay to accept it at face value. Maybe even respect other people's opinions, how is that for a concept?

If you see everything wrong with everybody - maybe it is time to look inward....
 
.
Pakistanis will never accept that bengali muslims played biggest role creating Pakistan.:disagree:
Their politics is even more biased than ours. And another thing bothers me is that their cosy relationship with sikhs. Sikhs killed most number of muslims during partition. Whole east punjab is almost muslim free now.


No Pakistani said Bengali didn't played the role in Pakistan movement, its you inferiority stricken bengalis who are trying to hijack credit from others (like your rant of "Biggest" role).. anyways how does it matter, you turned to Bengali nationalists from early days of Pakistan.. and sided with bharti's to form your country..

so does whole West Punjab is Hindu free and sikhs are very small minority.. mabe not more then few thousands.. i am sure east Punjab have more Muslims... Why should we continue to hate Sikhs when they are learning their lessons from Hindutva..
 
Last edited:
.
@bluesky what is up with you brother? You're picking fights with everyone around here. You picked a fight with me too sometime back - I stopped talking to you after that.
I believe in righteousness. This is why I protest whenever people try to bully others for no reason. About your own earlier post. You said about BD people drink a 200 Taka cup of tea, and I said I myself cannot even afford a 8 Taka tea. Please note that your bragging about your personal money was not good in my eyes.
 
.
You are talking as if all the Zamindaries in east Bengal were owned by the Muslims. You are an expert of making TAL out of TIL and distorting facts to make them fictions. Stop sending trashes that says almost nothing. In many of your sentences, you talk the same thing that I said before, but with a different tone as if I said something opposite and you are trying to put an argument against my saying. Stop wasting your time by making circular argument that i see in many of your posts.
Read the post properly
 
.
Predictions?

Its currently 119.65 billion USD for Karachi!

While its 35-36 billion for Dhaka..

Now your wishes wont change shyt!
Sigh.....

You are comparing Karachi's PPP of 2017 with Dhaka's nominal of 2014.

It's like you measure your height in centimeters and someone else's height in inches, and claiming that you are taller.

Bangladesh's GDP is 273 Billion while Pakistan's is 304 Billion. Despite Pakistan having 25% higher population.

Well anyway I don't think you will understand. Pakistanis have been incapable of rational thinking that's why they are where they are now. Anyway. Have fun.
 
.
Sigh.....

You are comparing Karachi's PPP of 2017 with Dhaka's nominal of 2014.

No, both are from 2015

https://www.lloyds.com/cityriskindex/locations/city/dhaka

Click karachi on the same page !
It's like you measure your height in centimeters and someone else's height in inches, and claiming that you are taller.

Bangladesh's GDP is 273 Billion while Pakistan's is 304 Billion. Despite Pakistan having 25% higher population.

Well anyway I don't think you will understand. Pakistanis have been incapable of rational thinking that's why they are where they are now. Anyway. Have fun.
Pakistans economy surpassed that in may 2017.

As for rational thinking.. coming from a bangladeshi .. quiet rich.
 
.
No, both are from 2015

https://www.lloyds.com/cityriskindex/locations/city/dhaka

Click karachi on the same page !

Pakistans economy surpassed that in may 2017.

As for rational thinking.. coming from a bangladeshi .. quiet rich.

Hahaha do you even know the difference between nominal and ppp GDP. The link that you are quoting is showing nominal GDP of Dhaka as of 2013 and PPP GDP of Pakistan which makes the source comparing apple with orange.

The projected estimate of GDP of Karachi 113 billion came from PwC which estimated Karachi's GDP to be 193 billion usd by 2025 and at the same time for Dhaka it will be 215 billion USD.


For you more details as reference:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Karachi

A PricewaterhouseCoopers study released in 2009, which surveyed the 2008 GDP of the top cities in the world, calculated Karachi’s GDP (PPP) to be $113 billion as of 2014. projected to be $193 billion in 2025 at a growth rate of 5.5%).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Dhaka

According to Cambridge University's 2014 analysis, the total nominal Gross State Product (GDP) of Dhaka was US$37 billion,[1]

To measure GDP both case source should be same. Look the PWC figures. As of 2008 both Dhaka and Karachi had 78 billion GDP (PPP). It will change to 215 billion usd for Dhaka and 193 billion usd for Karachi by 2025.

Look at page 12:::

http://pwc.blogs.com/files/global-city-gdp-rankings-2008-2025.pdf
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom