Manidabest
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2015
- Messages
- 2,205
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
may b hinduism predates budhism but in subcontinent budhism predates hinduismHinduism predates Buddhism
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
may b hinduism predates budhism but in subcontinent budhism predates hinduismHinduism predates Buddhism
But, Buddhism spread in the Hindu society. Hinduism with its JATPAT culture revived itself by the Brahmans and ousted Buddhism. Local Indians, the so-called low caste people, were forced to believe in the existence of Paradise under the feet of Brahmans. The low caste guys like you are still worshiping the fair-skinned Brahmans, who migrated from the west of India/the central Asia. I have seen with my own eyes how the low caste guys drink water soaked (or sweetened?) with Brahman toes. This is called 'Padodok', is not it?Hinduism predates Buddhism
Buddhism started 500 BC. Hinduism is older than thatmay b hinduism predates budhism but in subcontinent budhism predates hinduism
I might be wrong. But did Hinduism started as a religion? Hinduism was a Dharma from what I read. And it doesn't exactly translates to religion, but duty. Also it doesn't require you to pray to a god. I think it became a religion because of politics in the Gupta period....well, I could be wrong about all of it though.Buddhism started 500 BC. Hinduism is older than that
you have not answered where Hinduism started
1. Founders of Pakistan never indulged in terror activities whereas rss was pre partition and L k advani accepted that he planned the murder of jinnah ....
2. those soo called muslim dynasties who ruled india were just muslims by name and act but they never imposed their views forecfully on indian population ( otherwise indians wont have non muslim majority in india )... it is mostly western propaganda adopted by their eastern bed fellow to forward their agendas.
. hinduism is not the birthplace of india at all..
Going by the decision to snub the Bengali language the fellow is clueless about linguistic confederations4. He cared about linguistic confederation because he promoted secularism then...and he believed that linguistic based confederation will be secular in nature and power will b shared between two dominant groups
I might be wrong. But did Hinduism started as a religion? Hinduism was a Dharma from what I read. And it doesn't exactly translates to religion, but duty. Also it doesn't require you to pray to a god. I think it became a religion because of politics in the Gupta period....well, I could be wrong about all of it though.
As a culture it predates Buddhism. But does it as a religion?Considering the misery caused by the partition I don't blame someone for wanting to assassinate Jinnah
A lot of them tried. Aurangzeb was the most glaring example. His rule led to the downfall of the Mughal Empire
Where did it originate ??
Going by the decision to snub the Bengali language the fellow is clueless about linguistic confederations
Hinduism predates Buddhism. It has never been a well defined religion
The gods, caste system, vedas predate BuddhismAs a culture it predates Buddhism. But does it as a religion?
Considering the misery caused by the partition I don't blame someone for wanting to assassinate Jinnah
A lot of them tried. Aurangzeb was the most glaring example. His rule led to the downfall of the Mughal Empire
Where did it originate ??
Going by the decision to snub the Bengali language the fellow is clueless about linguistic confederations
Hinduism predates Buddhism. It has never been a well defined religion
This part sounds like hogwash. Do you think that Hinduism is the only religion that has idols? Have you ever heard or even read about the Sumerian religion at all? It's different from Hinduism. Idolatry may be present in both religions, but that certainly doesn't mean they're the same. Just look at the idols of the ancient Sumerian religion and Hinduism, there's little to no resemblance.3. it certainly did not originated in geographical present day india or in subcontinent but there is a mention of its origin in Quran in the story of Prophet Abraham ( Peace be upon him)where he smashed the minor idols and placed the axe on big idol and when the people returned from the festival they asked who did it and Prophet Abraham ( Peace be upon him) pointed towards the biggest idol on whose he placed the axe but people didnt believe him and said it cant move then Prophet Abraham (Peace be upon him ) replied then why do you pray to him if you know neither it can help you nor it can answer your prayers. you can search about the story there is a great lesson in it for people who wish to learn it
the place it happned is a present day Iraq and i am 100% sure that hinduism didnt originate in india it was imposed violently on the people of subcontinent as far as indonesia and nehru mentioned it in his book regarding this issue
You wish.
The problem was a confusingly large range of significant powers, many of which did not easily slot into
the categories of the theory. At one end of the spectrum of significant powers the United States was clearly still a superpower by any definition. At the other end were substantial numbers of regional powers such as Israel, Iran, Brazil, Indonesia, India, Pakistan, and Turkey. In between sat a set of second-rank powers that did not come close to measuring up to the USA, but which were significant global players in one way or another, and which clearly transcended regional or middle power status. These included China, Japan, and Russia, and more awkwardly
the EU.
1. well the assassination was planned way before separation ( the right word is separation not partition india has never been one country so who says india was partitioned in to two nations) by the then and now leading saffron terrorist organisation rss and LK advani already confessed it
3. it certainly did not originated in geographical present day india or in subcontinent but there is a mention of its origin in Quran in the story of Prophet Abraham ( Peace be upon him)where he smashed the minor idols and placed the axe on big idol and when the people returned from the festival they asked who did it and Prophet Abraham ( Peace be upon him) pointed towards the biggest idol on whose he placed the axe but people didnt believe him and said it cant move then Prophet Abraham (Peace be upon him ) replied then why do you pray to him if you know neither it can help you nor it can answer your prayers. you can search about the story there is a great lesson in it for people who wish to learn it
the place it happned is a present day Iraq and i am 100% sure that hinduism didnt originate in india it was imposed violently on the people of subcontinent as far as indonesia and nehru mentioned it in his book regarding this issue
2. nope...infact Aurangzeb employed more non muslims than muslims in his court and it is documented and they r available in british history library..... u r just one of those ignorant who read history one through ur nationalistic and religiously brainwashed mind
Thanks for acknowledging the obvious. The fact that Jinnah did not see it points to his failings as a leader.4. well i do believe it was a blunder by Jinnah for replacing all the languages with urdu ...
Whatever way you try to spin, fact is that (1) marginalized and oppressed Bengali Muslims had no option other than supporting Muslim League while same was not the case with Muslims of western frontier. (2) ML got power and recognized as representative of Muslims of all India only when Muslims of western frontier gave support. (3) Once we decided to have Pakistan (The word itself coined by Punjabi and stands for Punjab, Afghania, Kashmir, Sindh & Baluchistan) we got it within years. (4) Without support of people of today's Pakistan there wouldn't have been any Pakistan because you people were struggling to get Quotas and representation not the country.
It's Benalis who got country because of Muslims of western frontier not the other way.
I would disagree Urdu speaking Muslims in India and Bengali Muslims are responsible for Pakistan. They voted for the Muslim League (note - I did not say they voted for Pakistan)
It is partition of British India or British Indian Empire whether you like it or not.
What credibility does the police force have ? They allowed millions of murders to happen. Has anyone been brought to justice for anything ?
May be in your fantasy land.
Idol worship != Hinduism.
Iraq had civilizations - Mesopotamia, Babylon, Assyria etc. They have nothing to with India or Hinduism.
Aurangzeb is a complete bigot. He single handedly destroyed Mughal Empire. The wars he started did not end with his death.
For starters Nazis had Jewish employees in their concentration camps.
Thanks for acknowledging the obvious. The fact that Jinnah did not see it points to his failings as a leader.
I would disagree Urdu speaking Muslims in India and Bengali Muslims are responsible for Pakistan. They voted for the Muslim League (note - I did not say they voted for Pakistan)
pls dont tell me that idols dont have central part in hinduismThis part sounds like hogwash. Do you think that Hinduism is the only religion that has idols? Have you ever heard or even read about the Sumerian religion at all? It's different from Hinduism. Idolatry may be present in both religions, but that certainly doesn't mean they're the same. Just look at the idols of the ancient Sumerian religion and Hinduism, there's little to no resemblance.
And please don't tell me you think that the ancient Sumerians are Hindus because they also used idols in their religionpls dont tell me that idols dont have central part in hinduism
Pakistanis don't understand that everytime they bash Awami League for Bangladesh Independence the party gets more stronger.