Kautilya’s Arthashastra and Pakistan

[Kompromat]

We want China in SAARC and AIIB linked to it. Until that happens, we are not happy with a dysfunctional SAARC.

 

[third eye]

We are preparing for the 'Islamic Republic of Akhand Bharat'.

We are ready to reunite South Asia when we become a demographic majority. Islamic Republic of Akhand Bharat is all we want.

After a point in life ( & on this form) a degree of maturity needs to be displayed even if it does not exist.

 

[Sliver]

@Horus despite all your claims of the world going to be a Muslim dominated place, it is still not going to make it Pakistan.
There will be different nation states - even with Muslims. and the laws of foreign policy will still apply. You can look at your own neighborhood for that. No united Islamic super country yet - despite hundreds of years of Islamic countries living side by side.

 

[genmirajborgza786]

1. How do I care if a Muslim plunders and weakens another Muslim empire? You can kill each other to your hearts content, if you wish to. That is not the point.
2. The Marathas ruled for just short of a 100 years before they were defeated by the British.

Incorrect the Marathas were dominant only from 1720 till 1760 when they were defeated by the Afghans in 1761 & after that the British started to erode them from 1775 onwards , Remember it took the Mughals @ least 10-12 years to fall after Aurangzeb 1707 , & by the way the Marathas never ruled India in its entirety , there were the Mysore kingdom , Nizam , Nawab of Bengal , Ranjeet Singh , Awadh , Ahom, & the East India Company Too @ the same time with the Marathas
The Marathas Ruled only A large part of India & not the entire India & that too @ max 50 years & before that , they were confined to a small piece of land called Raigad

 

[zip]

We did it before, we'll do it again, only a Muslim ruled South Asia can become a true Super Power, just like the Mughal empire.

Who is this 'we'??
All those muslim invaders are not from pakistan ..Afghan people had their share in that conquest ..You being a victim of those invaders are now boasting about it !!!

 

[SrNair]

what i find ironic is that indians believe in myths weirder than those fantasized in fiction stories yet they have failed to even provide their citizens with proper mentality im not even talking about security for example whenever an unfortunate event such as a rape occurs your politicians will always say they are grieving but will not condemn. and the second thing is that u always talk about pakistan being weak and india being the much stronger nation yet whenever you try to increase tension on the borders the response is so befitting that you arent even left capable to stand and the height of ignorance in your people is so high that u claim to have won the kargil war yet u dont recall india begging for international help which enabled the UN to pressurize our government if you really were stronger u wouldve at least tried to fight. MAY THE EXCUSES BEGIN

Go and Cry me a River .
Who care about your beffitting reply ?
Last time you tried something in our border by using 8000 rounds of mortar.We returned the favour in multiple of 5 times .Around 50000 rounds landed in your side and entire
facilities of the Pakistan is destroyed.
Now that is what we ,perhaps the entire world,called as the befitting reply.

 

[indianBong]

Things change my friend, just look at recent history what we Muslims have done to USSR and Yoguslavia. India's hold on Kashmir is hardly something we haven't experianced before. We started off in the dusty Arabian desert, now we are spread from borders of Mongolia to the edges of Europe, from Indonesia to the Caspian sea. The internal conflict in our world is what we need to consolidate ourselves, once thats done, we'll do what we do best....expand...

@SarthakGanguly

i didn expect this from you..... Muslims never defeated USSR alone.... it was USA behind them who supported them with money, weapons and stinger missile.... mujahids don't have capability to "invent" any modern weapons.... internal rivalry won't allow muslim world to become a superpower.... hope you will acknowledge that....

 

[utraash]

Indians have a habbit of living and feeding on Myths. First of all Kautilya was the man who created what can only be called a 'civil war' in ancient India and if he was such a tactical genius, why did the Hindus lived under Muslim boot for 10 centuries?

South Asian demographics are changing in the favour of Muslims. Within 50 years we will be a demographic majority in South Asia. We are preparing for the 'Islamic Republic of Akhand Bharat'.

10century mullah rule could not vanish our trace from our land, forget about another 50 yrs.... Such post of yours are result of overdoses of afghani opium....
Neither feel this land is Iran , Egypt or Iraq ....
On topic
Its very relevant even in present day....

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Incorrect the Marathas were dominant only from 1720 till 1760 when they were defeated by the Afghans in 1761 & after that the British started to erode them from 1775 onwards , Remember it took the Mughals @ least 10-12 years to fall after Aurangzeb 1707 , & by the way the Marathas never ruled India in its entirety , there were the Mysore kingdom , Nizam , Nawab of Bengal , Ranjeet Singh , Awadh , Ahom, & the East India Company Too @ the same time with the Marathas
The Marathas Ruled only A large part of India & not the entire India & that too @ max 50 years & before that , they were confined to a small piece of land called Raigad

I will reply to this later.

Things change my friend, just look at recent history what we Muslims have done to USSR and Yoguslavia. India's hold on Kashmir is hardly something we haven't experianced before. We started off in the dusty Arabian desert, now we are spread from borders of Mongolia to the edges of Europe, from Indonesia to the Caspian sea. The internal conflict in our world is what we need to consolidate ourselves, once thats done, we'll do what we do best....expand...

@SarthakGanguly

Oh btw, did i mention that Muslims are getting an autonomous state in Phillipines as we speak?

Good luck mate. It's a positive but expected development.

and in that one hundred years they got their sissy *** kicked by the afgans. only in 1775 afterr ahmed shah was dead that the marathas entered delhi.

my point was mughal rule of india was longer and stronger. everything must come down so i am not sore about mughal empire falling .

As for your marathas they are just a footnote in history.

if the mughal empire had remained strong the british would never have ruled india. Aurangzeb made the english prostate in his court .

If the mughals remained strong in the entire country there would not be me or Sikhs in this country.

Marathas entered Delhi in 1758, not 75. Marathas are a footnote in India for political reasons, something that I will correct.

 

[kaku1]

We want China in SAARC and AIIB linked to it. Until that happens, we are not happy with a dysfunctional SAARC.

Here the test question for you. What is the full form of SAARC?

You want AIIB linked to it? There is any on off troll switch inside your body?

your people is so high that u claim to have won the kargil war

Okey, who won the Kargil war? Martians?

Things change my friend, just look at recent history what we Muslims have done to USSR and Yoguslavia. India's hold on Kashmir is hardly something we haven't experianced before. We started off in the dusty Arabian desert, now we are spread from borders of Mongolia to the edges of Europe, from Indonesia to the Caspian sea. The internal conflict in our world is what we need to consolidate ourselves, once thats done, we'll do what we do best....expand...

@SarthakGanguly

Oh btw, did i mention that Muslims are getting an autonomous state in Phillipines as we speak?

You forget what the Israel done with 2 of your friends in a single fight, who was supported by whole Muslim world?

And *cough* Ottoman Empire *cough*

 

[manishmaithani]

Indians have a habbit of living and feeding on Myths. First of all Kautilya was the man who created what can only be called a 'civil war' in ancient India and if he was such a tactical genius, why did the Hindus lived under Muslim boot for 10 centuries?

South Asian demographics are changing in the favour of Muslims. Within 50 years we will be a demographic majority in South Asia. We are preparing for the 'Islamic Republic of Akhand Bharat'.

I think it would be like : 'Islamic Republic of Baluchistan', 'Islamic Republic of Pakhtunistan', But where is Pakistan ?

 

[oFFbEAT]

Indians have a habbit of living and feeding on Myths. First of all Kautilya was the man who created what can only be called a 'civil war' in ancient India and if he was such a tactical genius, why did the Hindus lived under Muslim boot for 10 centuries?

South Asian demographics are changing in the favour of Muslims. Within 50 years we will be a demographic majority in South Asia. We are preparing for the 'Islamic Republic of Akhand Bharat'.

Learn some history before commenting, the difference between Kautilya/Chanakya's time and initial Islamic invasions into the subcontinent is more than 1000 yrs.....and the Delhi Sultanate established after almost 1500 yrs.
......and Muslims ruled Hindus for 10 centuries?? where did you get that statistics from??
The Mughals ruled majority of the subcontinent for 181 years, rest of the Muslim rulers ruled bits and parts of the subcontinent at different points in time.....
Even if we add all of them, it hardly adds up to 500 yrs......in RECORDED 5000 yr. old history of the subcontinent, which is less than 10%.

 

[Rau]

Incorrect the Marathas were dominant only from 1720 till 1760 when they were defeated by the Afghans in 1761 & after that the British started to erode them from 1775 onwards , Remember it took the Mughals @ least 10-12 years to fall after Aurangzeb 1707 , & by the way the Marathas never ruled India in its entirety , there were the Mysore kingdom , Nizam , Nawab of Bengal , Ranjeet Singh , Awadh , Ahom, & the East India Company Too @ the same time with the Marathas
The Marathas Ruled only A large part of India & not the entire India & that too @ max 50 years & before that , they were confined to a small piece of land called Raigad

Sir, I am partially agree with you on this.It is true that maratha not ruled the entire India, actually they never wanted to rule directly, they are happy with CHAUTH (fourth part of income paid as tribute by states that did not want the Marathas to enter into their realm )they get from respective ruler.Even at start of Maratha empire states such as Bijapur and Golkonda paid chauth to Shivaji. Thus, maratha not ruled directly over entirely but indirectly,yes they ruled them.
and within two years of defeat of Panipat, they defeat Nizam at battal of Rakhasabhuwan in 1763.Till the death of Yashawant rao holkar in 1811, maratha was only dominant force in India.

 

[illusion8]

South Asian demographics are changing in the favour of Muslims. Within 50 years we will be a demographic majority in South Asia. We are preparing for the 'Islamic Republic of Akhand Bharat'.

So what you are saying is an additional Islamofied messed up region to be added to the mess that is the CA, North Africa, Somalia, Sudan, Nigeria, Afg Pak, ME and the Islamofied ghettos in European countries..? basically an apocalyse - or more appropriately, a crazy bunch of yahoos running around spreading their medieval cult.

Dang..we need something similar to the samson option - take out as much of the poison in the world, before another decent country goes down the jihadi horde path.

 

[Whirling_dervesh]

It's a shame you generalize all Pakistanis as wannabes, brain dead zombies. This guy is a hero of Ancient Pakistan, I respect him and consider him my own over all foreign looters from central asia and other places.

Where have I said Pakistanis are wannabes, brain dead zombies??? Have you been smoking something? Most Pakistanis eulogise bin qasim, gaurI, ghaznavi et al. And it's true to say many tribes have foreign ancestory that give pakistan a rich composition, however we should also respect ancient peoples of this great land. Look at Egypt, Iraq and Iran , no one worships pyramids and the Qur'aan gives examples of firaawn they should be a lesson to all of us

Who is this 'we'??
All those muslim invaders are not from pakistan ..Afghan people had their share in that conquest ..You being a victim of those invaders are now boasting about it !!!

Lol where do u think those invaders went, there are more Pathans in pak than in afghan, Pakistani tribes include the Huns, scythians, Mughals, Pathan, turkics they certainly didn't migrate to india