ajtr
BANNED
- Joined
- May 25, 2010
- Messages
- 9,357
- Reaction score
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Inquilaab, inquilaab!
Thats GOI's propaganda.only indians can believe in GOI's propaganda machinery but not the kashmiris and not the world.Ya, and getting paid Rs 400 per week for doing that is a real "inqulab".
Indian law, Indian authority and Indian police is not recognized by Kashmiris.Wrong. Manhandling the police force is a punishable and criminal offense in India and all citizens should abide by this rule. They have no right to take the law into their hands. If they do, then better not complain on the consequences.
Acts like these play a part in aggravating the situation when the security forces are asked to maintain law and order.
Who believes your propaganda?
Why dont the world condemn us?? Are they too scared from us or do they have no sympathy for your kashmiri "brothers"??
The Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jonas Gahr Store has maintained that the current uprising in Kashmir is indigenous and youngsters throwing stones should not be met with bullets. Also, international standards on human rights should be upheld by all including India.
He was concluding the maiden debate on the Kashmir conflict in the Norwegian parliament {What do they think these Norwegians are ?} and stated that his government was encouraging India and Pakistan to solve the conflict through peaceful means as violence was no solution to their problems.
The Norwegian minster further said that Norway was constantly keeping an eye on the unfolding events in Kashmir, particularly through its embassies in New Dehli and Islamabad. He said: The Norwegian embassy in New Dehli has raised the issue of Kashmir with the Indian government at all levels.He recalled that he had personally talked about Kashmir during his visits to the region. He reminded the house that the Norwegian embassy participated in a joint Nordic delegation to Indian Held Jammu and Kashmir in April this year where they had taken up human rights and political situation with the representatives of the Jammu and Kashmir government and the police.
Chairman of Norwegian parliamentary Kashmir Committee Knut Arild Hareide said that peace in Afghanistan was linked to the settlement of Kashmir issue. She added that unsolved Kashmir conflict was hampering the international communitys efforts to curb terrorism worldwide.
Conservative Partys Member Parliament Peter Skovholt Gitmark also emphasised that people of Kashmir must be included in the settlement process. He further said that a negotiated solution between Pakistan and India must also reflect the wishes of the local people.
Other who participated in the debate included Svein Roald Hansen, MP for the Labour Party, Tone Liljeroth, MP for the Progress Party, MP Peter N Myhre of the Norwegian Progress Party and Akhtar Chaudhry of the Socialist Left Party.
Sardar Ali Shahnawaz Khan, Executive Director Kashmiri Scandinavian Council, Oslo, lauded the Norwegian Foreign Minister and Chairman Kashmir Committee Knut Arild Hareide for debating Kashmir in the Norwegian parliament and condemning the human rights violations publicly.
From sheikh abdullah to Omar Abdullah kashmiris have seen the changing colors of abdullah clan.Untill kashmiri politicians remain in good books of delhi they rule and they betray ordinary kashmiris.but present intifada is popular root level revolution for freedom which is not so influenced by some towering figures.Looks like the manhandled policeman is also a Kashmiri.
Atleast this shows that the police is using minimal force and not resorting to violence where they could have justifiably use the machine gun in his hand to prevent being manhandled by the rioters.
------------
@ajtr
This seems to be an article with some biased view points. Although there is no doubt that Sheikh Abdulla was by far the most popular and well respected leader in J&K and in particular the valley.
Let me give you primary sources from Sheikh Abdulla's own speeches on this.
Here is his speech to the J&K constituent assembly after the first elections in 1951.
Here is his speech in the UN Security council on the tribal invasion of Kashmir and the ensuing issues in 1948
Excerpts From The Speech Made By Mr.Sheikh Mohammed Abdullah (India) In The Security Council Meeting No.241 Held On 5 February 1948
That is precisely the source of the problems. Protests happen almost on a daily basis in various parts of the country for a variety of reasons, but never do they escalate to this level and the only reason being that people do things within the purview of law. Ones who don't are put to jail, but as the numbers are manageable, the law and order situation prevails.Indian law, Indian authority and Indian police is not recognized by Kashmiris.
If I were to argue on this I would just be repeating the several threads that we have had on this issue. Had the events not happened in a certain way things would have been a lot different. You and I hold a different viewpoint on the origin of the Kashmiri issue. I say that the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir in Oct'47 was an illegitimate act. Does that change anything in equation? No.They are just an enemy that has to be fought by all means necessary. The original crime is the occupation of Kashmir, from that point on everything is legitimate.
Kashmir protest is entierly different from 1000 other protest going on in india.Kashmir is ocupied land hence indian law doesnt mean anything for kashmiris unlike other parts of the country.Kashmir intifada is for the freedom and right to self determination. from india.That is precisely the source of the problems. Protests happen almost on a daily basis in various parts of the country for a variety of reasons, but never do they escalate to this level and the only reason being that people do things within the purview of law. Ones who don't are put to jail, but as the numbers are manageable, the law and order situation prevails.
See I don't detest Kashmiris rights to protest against the atrocities, but I am gravely against resorting to mob violence and attacking public property and personnel.
If I were to argue on this I would just be repeating the several threads that we have had on this issue. Had the events not happened in a certain way things would have been a lot different. You and I hold a different viewpoint on the origin of the Kashmiri issue. I say that the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir in Oct'47 was an illegitimate act. Does that change anything in equation? No.
Kashmir protest is entierly different from 1000 other protest going on in india.Kashmir is ocupied land hence indian law doesnt mean anything for kashmiris unlike other parts of the country.Kashmir intifada is for the freedom and right to self determination. from india.
OK... but then why complain when protesters are shot at. From your argument it seems that there are two groups at war against each other. One who believes Kashmir is a part of India and the others who are against this.Kashmir protest is entierly different from 1000 other protest going on in india.Kashmir is ocupied land hence indian law doesnt mean anything for kashmiris unlike other parts of the country.Kashmir intifada is for the freedom and right to self determination. from india.
Just think what you want to think
But it cant change the facts . Kashmir is part of India any one cant take it from India