Yea that mechanism is called shooting children
indian news from 2010?! indians would type anything!
Here is something from 2015:
https://www.dawn.com/news/1217447
3. The basic points about the UN resolution are that:
• The complaint relating to Kashmir was initiated by India in the Security Council;
• The Council explicitly and by implications, rejected India's claim that Kashmir is legally Indian territory;
• The resolutions established self-determination as the governing principal for the settlement of the Kashmir dispute. This is the world body's commitment to the people of Kashmir;
• The resolutions endorsed a binding agreement between India and Pakistan reached through the mediation of UNCIP, that a plebiscite would be held, under agreed and specified conditions.
1. The Security Council has rejected the Indian contention that the people of Kashmir have exercised their right of self-determination by participating in the "election" which India has from time to time organized in the Held Kashmir. The 0.2% turn out during the 1989 "elections" was the most recent clear repudiation of the Indian claim.
2. Pakistan continues to adhere to the UN resolutions. These are binding also on India.
3. The Simla Agreement of 2 July 1972, to which Pakistan also continues to adhere, did not alter the status of Jammu and Kashmir as a disputed territory:
• Para 6 of the Agreement lists “a final settlement of Jammu and Kashmir" as one of the outstanding questions awaiting a settlement.
• Para 4 (ii) talks of a "Line of Control" as distinguished from an international border. Furthermore, it explicitly protects "the recognized position of either side." The recognized position of Pakistan is the one, which is recognized by the United Nations and the World Community in general.
• Article 1(iv) obviously refers to the Kashmir issue when it talks of "the basic issues and causes of conflict which have bedeviled the relations between the two countries for the last 25 year.
The government of Pakistan and Government of India are resolved that the two countries put an end to the conflict and confrontation that have hitherto marred their relations and work for the promotion of a friendly and harmonious relationship and the establishment of durable peace in the subcontinent, so the both countries may henceforth devote their resources and energies to the pressing task of advancing the welfare of their people.
Here is what the world sees it as:
https://www.worldbulletin.net/inter...-oldest-dispute-at-the-un-agenda-h146986.html
UN in 2018:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ful-killings-in-kashmir-in-first-ever-report/
While being narrow in scope, the report is reflexive in understanding its limitations, mindful of the complex history and the diverse communities of the region, and perhaps most importantly,
shatters the myth of India’s presumed territorial integrity by maintaining that Kashmir is a ‘disputed territory’. The statistics and incidents cited are not surprising, having been identified by independent activists and journalists for years, but their reiteration by an international body like the Office of the High Commissioner nonetheless constitutes an important step towards breaking the stagnation in international media and academia regarding Kashmir. The report, its acknowledgement of the right of the Kashmiris to self- determination, and its call for an independent commission to further investigate human rights abuses through on-site investigation represent major steps in dismantling the culture of silence generated by India regarding the situation in Kashmir. It is not simply an acknowledgement (long overdue) of the grief and violence
Kashmiris have been and continue to be subjected to, but also an acknowledgement of them as political subjects with a right to decide their own political future.
In 2018:
http://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/lets-talk-...lic-significance-of-the-un-report-on-kashmir/