Let me correct you here, only some Kashmiris of "Sunni Muslim" sect from the Kashmir Valley area are suffering for their own extreme religious bigotry and violence resulting out of it. Rest of the Kashmiris, including Kashmiris of all other religions and even Kashmiris of other sects of Islam want their armed forces, that is Indian forces' presence there. In fact they are still surviving in their ancestral land because of the presence of armed forces.
I just saw some Pakistanis including you trying to evoke 'conscience' of Indian people for those "Sunni Muslim Kashmiris" of the valley, but conscience for what? To give some sections of Kashmiris the right to enforce brute majoritarianism, persecute Kashmiris of other religions, and create their own mini Khilafat there? Sorry, Indian constitution doesn't offer that kind of 'freedom'.
I was done with this thread and then i saw this golden comment. Love the upgrade, gone from the whole of Jammu and Kashmir(including AJK and GB) to the valley, made my day. Anything that helps keep the masses in delusion. BTW, do you seriously fall for this Shia Sunni crap? And how many times have i countered this and how many times have i waited for any reply on the point.
PS: just question the jump from the whole of Jammu Kashmir to the Kashmir valley, now that is a question you must ask yourself. And was there a census to determine this or Indian media crap?
PPS: Are these folks all Sunnis? no Shias? just curious...
And do you really think they are all being paid too? come on folks, delusion is not going to help.
Given the pictures you have posted, and the number of casualties, you can judge the restraint the forces have exercised.
Thoughts on calling the protesters terrorists and justifying killings of protesters? Should it not be condemned, don't you think such acts will only incite more hatred, especially among the youth. Forget about the youth on this side...
For example take this image:
What result will this lead to? how would you take your mother or sister getting this treatment. Forget about violating curfew and crap...
What will you say ,tomorrow if ,Afghanistan says same about Durand Line .?
Why can't we just discuss Kashmir for the time being...
Kashmir had legally acceded to India, but by then, two important components (three, counting Chitra, Hunza and Nagar and the Pamir emirates as one entity) had broken away, or were determined to do so and burst into revolt within days of the accession.
Holds no value, depends on what the locals want. Legally speaking so should:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manavadar
Matters what the locals want...
"The last straw was Major Brown’s disagreement over some administrative issue with Governor’s staff that came from Srinagar. The Governor sided with his staff; and Major Brown got extremely angry and locked himself up in a room to analyse the situation and plan his future action. In his book, The Gilgit Rebellion, Major Brown writes, and I quote:
‘I, therefore, felt it was my duty, as the only Britisher left, to follow a course which would prevent this. And further, as a liberal member of the world’s paragon of democracy, I considered that the whole of Kashmir, including Gilgit Province, unquestionably go to Pakistan in view of the fact that the population was predominantly Muslim. Partisan, traitor, revolutionary, I may have been, but that evening my sentiments dictated that if the Maharaja acceded to India, then I would forego all the allegiance to him and I would not rest content until I had done the utmost in my power to ensure that not only the Gilgit Province joined Pakistan, but the whole of Kashmir also.’ Unquote"
Source:
https://defence.pk/threads/how-gilgit-baltistan-got-liberated.375789/#ixzz4E5s1swls
The rest i'd say i am done, won't reply unless rainman comes with another one of his golden posts.
; when will India learn that such use of force on civilians is only going to create more problems? Only going to urge the youth to take up arms...
)
