What's new

Kargil War: from Pakistani point if view.....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Answer my questions, rather than resorting to semantics, Indian.
The answer was simple..India won Kargil.

And I dont really understand what do you mean by semantics.If pounding of Pakistani soldiers by Air Force and hundreds of heavy field guns until the entire area is purged and purified, is semantics for you, then you might as well never get the point in your entire life.

One more time..India killed all the intruders threw them outside and did not let the Pakistani objective of taking Kargil to succeed = Indian victory...

Semantics ... my foot.
 
Last edited:
. .
The answer was simple..India won Kargil.


LoL, you desperate Indian.

You are so funny.

Look what you wrote here.

Code:
Coffin scandal or a mistake in count does not win the war for you.

So your IA or government couldn't even figure out your casualties.



If so many Pakistanis died and Indians won the war, why is it that no Pakistani family has raised protest against the operation for their son's life lost, or the positions you lost highlighted by your media.

Why your military has not defeated our country, yet?


You Indians got hammered in Kargil.

Your generals watched the blood of your sipahis roll down the mountain peaks as they were getting gunned down by light machine gun fire.
 
.
LoL, you desperate Indian.

You are so funny.

Look what you wrote here.

Code:
Coffin scandal or a mistake in count does not win the war for you.

So your IA or government couldn't even figure out your casualties.



If so many Pakistanis died and Indians won the war, why is it that no Pakistani family has raised protest against the operation for their son's life lost, or the positions you lost highlighted by your media.

Why your military has not defeated our country, yet?


You Indians got hammered in Kargil.

Your generals watched the blood of your sipahis roll down the mountain peaks as they were getting gunned down by light machine gun fire.


I would very much like to think that the Pakistani families ask this question to Musharraf that what did he gain from this misadventure, because it achieved nothing for Pakistan apart from death of thousands of young men.If they dont ask this question, then I am sorry, but I will have to conclude that these families simply didnt care for their sons.

India not only won Kargil, but also the rest of the skirmishes/wars, be it 1948,1665,1971,1999.

And be rest assured, you dont need India to destroy Pakistan.You yourself are perfectly capable of doing that, which is in fact, happening these days.In any case, dont forget, it took 13 days for India to reduce Pakistan by the size of France back in 1971.

Go live with that.....
 
.
No man...i don't want to put down indians anymore.

I read somewhere that is a great sin to put down anyone inferior than you. I am trying to not bash indians anymore..i mean yes they are inferior..yes they got humiliated for thousands of years..yes they are not fighters..Yes Muslims divided their land into three...Yes they have more poor than whole africa..yes majority of their population doesn't have toilets...yes they are ugly..weak..hairy..dark..and with smallest penises...and yes when they faced their equals, the Chinese, they got literally r*ped. But does it mean that we must make fun of them? Nah man...We must civilize them by spreading Islam and converting these uncivilized souls to the light of Islam.

Talking about videos, forget Kargil, even the general who commanded Bangladesh war admits that Pakistani Army fought very, very bravely but it had no chance. Bharat Verma admits that it was a political defeat rather than a military one. And I can post "videos" of these generals..

But hey, indians won't accept them though.. let them feel good about themselves :lol:

lol:yahoo:, big words from a citizen of a banana republic with a crashing economy. pakistanis do not have their own cosmodrome, while indians are way to advanced in space tech, the missiles that pakis are proud of and go on shouting that they themselves have developed those, are cheap chinese and north korean m9, m11 and no dong missile which cannot even match the sophistication that indian missiles have, we are on our way to become 1 of the leading economies of the world and pakistin will surely cease to exist in the near future because the so called '' the soldiers of god'' mujahedins will surely devastate pakistan, a country which lost nearly 1/3 of its territory at the hands of indians still think that indians are inferior to them, a country whose test of nuclear device was a failure and then for saving their face exploded a ready made device which they got from china, this is a proven fact because pakistani nuclear weapon programme was uranium based and after the test of device by pakistan it was found dat device was plutonium based bomb no need to mention here dat which country has plutonium based weapons. pakistanis got defeated by Indians in all wars, but still Indians are inferior. whenever India develops inducts sophisticated weapon systems in its arsenal their are cries from pakistan dat India is fuelling an arms race in the region, ADMIT IT, U R NOT EVEN IN THE RACE, INDIANS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN SUPERIOR AND THEY WILL REMAIN SUPERIOR TO PAKIS TILL ETERNITY
 
.
What a journalist that too with the caliber of him knows abt military affairs?

This all is his personal view point. Not reality.

So what ever happened to the "gang of four" that was mentioned in the video. Now that Nawaz Sharif is back for second term, is he gonna constitute a inquiry commission into Kargil fiasco or victory which ever it may be. All we have is our official version of the report but none from other side. We have to depend on Pakistani Media like the one above from Najam Sethi to inform us about your version.
 
.
lol, "Najam Sethi" and "eminent Pakistani journalist"? LMAO!

indians are such retards..

How about I post "Analysis of Indo-Pak situation by an eminent Indian Media House" ..and then post videos from IndiaTv? :lol:
Not more the one who is denial mode... I don't want to call all your country nationals... but some specific persons... who always like to go personal...
 
.
lol, "Najam Sethi" and "eminent Pakistani journalist"? LMAO!

indians are such retards..

How about I post "Analysis of Indo-Pak situation by an eminent Indian Media House" ..and then post videos from IndiaTv? :lol:
don't hold on ; plz ...
 
.
how have you been auz dear ... ?!:smitten: where you were for so many days ... ? :undecided:
bhari bachay were itching to get your dose ... :enjoy:
 
. .
how have you been auz dear ... ?! :smitten:where you were for so many days ... ? :undecided:
bhari bachay were itching to get your dose ... :hang2::hang3::omghaha:


jaisi yeh indian qom haey , waisa he iska kaam haey ... :fie::sick::big_boss:

india ki asal owkaat dikhhaata hun tum ko maiy abb ... :smokin: :pakistan:

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available
:haha:


congrats.. you just gave a hell of a big argument.

Go fish... you need some serious character building courses...Your schools seem to be lacking heavily there.

@sms This guy just proved your point in that shayari of yours..
 
.
3000 Pak soldiers died in Kargil: Benazir


Some 3,000 Pakistani servicemen died in the 1999 conflict in Kargil, former prime minister Benazir Bhutto has said, rubbishing General Pervez Musharraf's claim that the Pakistani establishment was not involved in the confrontation.

In an interview to Gulf Today from London, Bhutto said post-mortem reports of many of the servicemen showed that they had been eating grass because the service lines were cut and they were abandoned.

In another interview to Khaleej Times, she described Gen Musharraf as "the architect of the Kargil conflict".

Sarcastically, she added that Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee would welcome him with gifts of Kashmiri handicrafts at their summit in Agra.

Gen Musharraf was Pakistan's army chief during the Kargil conflict while Nawaz Sharief was prime minister.

Pakistan had denied the involvement of its troops in the conflict even as India maintained that the intruders in the sensitive area were actually Pakistani soldiers.

rediff.com: 3000 Pak soldiers died in Kargil: Benazir
 
.
Post video of their general admitting they got butt fuggled in Kargil, and then the slum dogs will clear out.
RazPak bhai, why do you always talk like an imbecile in permanent rehab? That general did NEVER say that India 'fuggled' in Kargil. What he meant was that THE INDIAN ARMY FAILED TO EXPLOIT THE SITUATION TO ITS ADVANTAGE BY ATTACKING ACROSS THE LoC IN SPITE OF THROWING THE PAKISTANI ARMY BACK. THAT WAS WHY, ACCORDING TO HIM, IT WAS NOT A COMPLETE VICTORY.

Well, do you see now what he meant? He never said that Pakistan won the war!! So you can dance and shout by misreading on purpose what he meant. The fact is Pakistan got screwed. Period! Ask your generals notably Gen Kayani, then 10 Corps Commander who mentioned in his interview that the PA never expected such a deadly response from the IA and that the Bofors guns played merry hell with the PA inflicting unacceptable casualties!

He also mentioned that Nawaz rushed to America to persuade India to cease the assaults as "Pakistan Army ka izzat ka swaal thha." Meaning they were getting it hard and needed to withdraw without further casualties!! (These are not my words. Its Pakistan's 10 Corps Commander's).

One of the main objectives of the 'gang of four' that included Mush was to capture Siachen. If Pakistan had won the Kargil war as many of you seem to think (due to ISPR propaganda) then how come Siachen is still with India? If you couldn't achieve your main objective it means you lost the war. QED!

Also go ask Nawaz who's party has produced a white paper on the war where it is mentioned that the PA suffered more than 3000 casualties!

You can never fight a war without artillery and air support. But Pakistan couldn't employ these since Mush was lying through his teeth when he told the world that those fighting in Kargil were 'Kashmiri freedom fighters'!! So obviously he couldn't use his artillery as the so called freedom fighters don't have any! If he had used it, then the cat would have been out of the bag, meaning that the world would have seen that it was the PA which was actively involved in the conflict and not the so called freedom fighters!!

And in his book, Mush still contends that they were Kashmiri 'freedom fighters'!!
 
.
Bwhahahahaha.

Despite what you Indians write in unison against clear cut proofs, you need to be reminded again and again.

What can you Indians do against Pakistan?

Even your cult like figure Namo can not do shit.

So why is it that a nation seven times smaller than you dictate your pathetic people?

:rofl:
 
.
An Indian General says on television that the situation could not be exploited further and press advantage and he considers that as partial victory.You herald it as Indian failure and Pakistani victory!!!

Lets see what the top "Pakistani Generals" have to say about this.Not one, but 3 of them in one show.the other Pakistani Generals have also given similar opinions and I can share them all if needed.

 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom