Parashuram1;700514]By quelling any potential terrorist movements inspired by Gaddafi in our country. We don't need to let his citizens suffer because of his sick mentality.
This is your reply. But your original quote was
Yeah Right! After that, we will take him and his stupid country back to stone age and expel every migrant who advocates terrorism in our country. Gaddafi forgets that we are ONE Europe
You certainly have the propensity to violence. Your expressed intention of causing an apocalyptic demise of a nation is certainly shocking. Europe is capable of unspeakable horror as the events of WW II showed. An epic event that destroyed countries, a colossal loss of 40 million lives in Europe, and a wanton slaughter of people of a certain faith. Most people didn't forget that, and would not forget that. Soviet Union alone lost about 24 million people. Please think twice ( or more if you need to) before you sing the gospel of European values. If you claim events like that will never happen again, allow me to remind you the quote of of a certain Spaniard ( European) named George Santayana, "those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it." Your willful intention to take a nation back to stone age certainly indicates that you, "a UN hat wearing proud European" refuse to learn from history.
My dear Bangladeshi friend
You assume way more than you need to.
Do you actually think that we would be attacking Tripoli with our armed forces? Please remember that these bombings were done as a response to Mr. Gaddafi's inspiring of terrorist activities against certain countries. I didn't imply that we will bomb Libya. We Swiss don't attack innocent civilians who have no ill-intentions towards us, just because they have a crazy dictator.
In the article Gaddafi didn't make any threat to cause bodily harm. You on the other hand making threats of harm. You said,
He's forgotten the last time his wretched country got a taste of bombing.
Do twist my sentences to your convenience. Please read above responses.
There is nothing to twist here. The UN was created so nations can work out their differences. What is astonishing is you claim yourself to be a UN employee, and then start mouthing apocalyptic rants. For the love of God , take a good look at yourself !!!
I know about my country well enough buddy. Let me take another example of your case. If suppose you have good ties with Myanmar in commerce and trade and then suddenly Burmese regime starts inspiring terrorist activities in your country... would you abandon trade and defend your country or stand there and continue to suffer? Any aggression from our side would be against terrorists and their agencies.
Once again your assuming. But hey I will play along.
There are at least two more actors in your hypothetical theater. The actions these actors take are generally reciprocal in nature. As a UN employee you should know that of all the people.
If defending my country is called right wing noise machine, feel free to make yourself happy with your assumptions. Check on your country's threads on this forum which is nothing but gasbag of aggression against your neighbour India. Now that is called right wing noise machine.
Hold on a moment their pilgrim ! The discussion is about Gaddafi, Switzerland, and your failure to uphold the proud tradition on the UN. No need to drag the kitchen sink in here.
However, interestingly, I noticed Indian and Bangladeshi members passionately defend their cause, you ( with a UN hat and a proud European), on the other hand issuing apocalyptic consequences to a certain country. Following is my original quote,
You sound more like what comes off from the right wing noise machine. You sure as hell don't sound like a " The great UN hat wearing one." In an earlier post I mentioned Gaddafi is boorish. Gaddafi has already made his move, if you are not sure, ask your President.
Chest thumping is done by kids of that age normally and I meant it as a figure of speech.
Here is the definition from Miriam-Webster for chest thumping, "conduct or expression marked by pompous or arrogant self-assertion <political chestthumping>"
Your diplomatic skills are rather boorish.
And perhaps you need to stop thinking that everything that happens in history doesn't need to necessarily exist all over again. You were earlier a part of Pakistan and for centuries were a part of British empire and before that a part of India... then shouldn't you according to your logic be ruled by Delhi?
I agree to the first sentence to some extent, even though I find it rather objectionable. I am not sure how the second sentence relates to the issue of the minaret. How does the construction of minaret means that Swiss people would want Islamic rule in their land ?
Hey bud,
its just a minaret, its not out to get you. I guarantee that its not going to grow fangs or long nails and then chase you in a nightmare. I hope you are in firm control of your faculty. You are showing the classic signs of paranoia.
Switzerland is a country with its own culture and way of life. The migrants chose to come here knowing what they will have to choose and face. We didn't beg them. And what's more, everyone else is staying here proudly. We honor and respect everyone with dignity and respect and give them the same benefits that we do to our citizens. Expatriates are welcome as long as they respect the Swiss laws and way of life. I am not against that.
But they must know that this is not their country and everything ideal according to them cannot exist. I was merely stating that and nothing more. As for right wing noise machine, check the posts about your country on this forum and the enemies that it sees everywhere around itself. So much for right wing noise making.
When someone becomes a citizen of a country, by definition its his/hers country. They are entitled to everything that is under the Swiss Constitution. All the legal avenues are open to those people.
I personally believe in the Constitution of the United States.
Here is my question to you, if they can get the minaret ban overturned by the Swiss Supreme Court or The European Court, will you accept that as the Law of the land ?