What's new

JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 7]

dude...they made a "mock up" for a reason...besides, JF17 is already flying while carrying 4 500lb bombs, 2 per dual rack, what makes you think it can't carry 4 400lb PL12/SD10s, 2 per rack?

View attachment 615781
^^^ this one ain't no mockup.

True. But launching missles from a 'dual rack' is different to bombs dropping. I would assume multiple factors will have to be looked into including clear launch, no damage to adjacent stores and pylons etc.
 
.
Bro deino will not accept your argument bcz it will hurt it’s little ego.he think he has all the knowledge.

No, but I don't like these Indian-style chest-bumping mentality of some fans which constantly claim each and every model or CG has to be taken as a proof for their whishes.

My ego is completely irrelevant since it tangles me not the bit if there is or is not a twin launcher for the PL-12 already in service.

Anyway a nice day, take care and stay healthy.
Deino :-)
 
.
Suggestions, assumptions, wishes & CGIs be kept away from real time discussions. Members are advised repeatedly to use other/relevant thread for any proposals such as engine, bigger wings, more fuel, more hard points etc.

Regards,
 
.
Why increase strength of No. 2 and not replace the maritime sqn mirages. Exocet stock can be sent to PN for use with Sea Kings.

Have we approached the French about trying to integrate the Exocets onto the JF17? Granted, they are an old platform but they still have value in a "swarm" attack against Indian naval assets, in particular as a distraction tool that is low cost..
 
.
Have we approached the French about trying to integrate the Exocets onto the JF17? Granted, they are an old platform but they still have value in a "swarm" attack against Indian naval assets, in particular as a distraction tool that is low cost..
why bother. you already have a far more lethal alternatives that are tested and flying on jf17 with better ranges.
 
.
dude...they made a "mock up" for a reason...besides, JF17 is already flying while carrying 4 500lb bombs, 2 per dual rack, what makes you think it can't carry 4 400lb PL12/SD10s, 2 per rack?

View attachment 615781
^^^ this one ain't no mockup.
There is no doubt it can(by physics), if PAF invests into making it/integrating it ..and that is what we dont know
 
. .
There is no doubt it can(by physics), if PAF invests into making it/integrating it ..and that is what we dont know
PL12/SD10s are already integrated with with the JF17...it'll be a minor software and electronic change use the dual rack mounted PL12s.
 
.
I wad at work the last time I posted..... I couldn't listen to the podcast but I have some time now so I'm listening (I just paused it)....

for those of you that have been wanting the podcast to be translated (or at least summarized).....

I do intend to work on summarizing it but.......

I'm listening to the podcast and I've been informed a few things

for example, they just explained that Pakistan means "land of purity" and that "stan" means "land of".......

they also said Pakistan and India are arch-rivals, said that Soviets supported India, China supported Pakistan, mentioned that a lot of people suffered during Partition...... they also took some shots at the British for being evil and defended Spain and the Spanish Empire

(the podcast is from Spain.... a lot of Spaniards believe the British empire was worse than the Spanish Empire and that the Spanish Empire was more humane.... and I agree! in Latin America, there are tons of Indians alive and well...... meanwhile in the US the Anglos basically wiped out their entire race........ the Spanish would often marry Indian women and have mixed babies... the Anglos would simply pretty much wipe out the entire Indian race where they lived.... there were also many idealistic Catholic priests who travelled to Latin America with the wish to save the souls of the Indians from hellfire and who often defended the rights of the Indians when they arrived and saw mistreatment.... Spain also had a big debate about the ethics of colonization and I believe was the only European colonial power where they actually had a big debate over the morality of colonialism)

anyways.... I want to post this and get back to listening but.....

as much as I enjoy the podcast.....

there are no actual Pakistanis on the podcast and I doubt any of them speak Urdu.....

these are Spaniards going off Spanish-language sources....

I think they are well-intentioned and I think it's commendable that they are learning about the history of Pakistan...

but the podcast is by and for a Hispanic audience.....

I say that because..... the podcast is teaching very basic things for an audience that is not very familiar with Pakistan....

if you know Urdu, I think you'd be much better off going to Urdu, Pakistani sources.....

the podcast is very well intentioned but I don't think any of them know Urdu and so I think it would be better to utilize Pakistani sources tbh

I still want to summarize the podcast when I'm done listening but so far it's been very basic lessons about Pakistan for an audience that is not very familiar.... it might get more advanced as I get further in, though

EDIT:


btw if anyone is interested in Pakistani history in Spanish

this is a video discussing the topic of
"why do India and Pakistan hate each other?"
they talk about Muhammad Jinnah and creation of Pakistan... very neat stuff if you maybe want to practice Spanish or simply enjoy content about Pakistani history in Spanish....

but bear in mind, material in Spanish on Pakistani history.... generally it's going to be a bit basic....
 
Last edited:
.
I wad at work the last time I posted..... I couldn't listen to the podcast but I have some time now so I'm listening (I just paused it)....
....


Oh come on ... why again bringing India vs Pakistan into that topic!? :hitwall::crazy: This is the JF-17 thread and to this India as as relevant as Germany.

This is nasty off topic ! :offtopic:
 
.
Oh come on ... why again bringing India vs Pakistan into that topic!? :hitwall::crazy: This is the JF-17 thread and to this India as as relevant as Germany.

This is nasty off topic ! :offtopic:

I was simply reporting what the podcast said...... I was asked to discuss the podcast so I did so... I'm not trying to stir up Pakistan versus India stuff....

I think the podcast does get to the F-17s but it's a nearly five hour podcast so it hasn't gotten there yet

EDIT: or do you think Bully Magnets the producers of the video on Pakistani history is out to stir up Pakistan versus India stuff? the video is just trying to educate people....... are people wrong to perceive India and Pakistan as having conflict?? I am not responsible for that perception..... those two countries almost went to war least year...... an international audience can't be blamed for perceiving the two as having conflict.....
 
Last edited:
. .
007Kimevgy1gd2pqp3pqgj30zk0m8n4m.jpg

Via @奇圆JeffHoly from Weibo
 
.
Bro deino will not accept your argument bcz it will hurt it’s little ego.he think he has all the knowledge.

He certainly does have more knowledge than you guys,let's accept the fact that presently JF.17 has not been cleared to carry SD.10's on dual racks and it's only limited to DCS.

dude...they made a "mock up" for a reason...besides, JF17 is already flying while carrying 4 500lb bombs, 2 per dual rack, what makes you think it can't carry 4 400lb PL12/SD10s, 2 per rack?

View attachment 615781
^^^ this one ain't no mockup.

Dual racks for SD.10's have not been operationalized on the aircraft yet,a lot of the stuff you see on DCS has simply not been used on the aircraft presently.
 
.
He certainly does have more knowledge than you guys,let's accept the fact that presently JF.17 has not been cleared to carry SD.10's on dual racks and it's only limited to DCS.



Dual racks for SD.10's have not been operationalized on the aircraft yet,a lot of the stuff you see on DCS has simply not been used on the aircraft presently.
Whats your source ?
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom