Pakistani Fighter
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2011
- Messages
- 9,124
- Reaction score
- -5
I really wonder why Takbir wasn't used on 27th Feb. It has 100km range as compared to MK 83 REK of 60km.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I really wonder why Takbir wasn't used on 27th Feb. It has 100km range as compared to MK 83 REK of 60km.
I wonder if the CEP is different - we didn't want any human casualties or collateral damage at all that day.I really wonder why Takbir wasn't used on 27th Feb. It has 100km range as compared to MK 83 REK of 60km.
less than 10mI wonder if the CEP is different - we didn't want any human casualties or collateral damage at all that day.
I think you have ADD attention deficit syndrome.you mean he have more knowledge about jf17 than Pakistanis if he have than share his source.He certainly does have more knowledge than you guys,let's accept the fact that presently JF.17 has not been cleared to carry SD.10's on dual racks and it's only limited to DCS.
Dual racks for SD.10's have not been operationalized on the aircraft yet,a lot of the stuff you see on DCS has simply not been used on the aircraft presently.
کھالی پلائوWhats your source ?
I think you have ADD attention deficit syndrome.you mean he have more knowledge about jf17 than Pakistanis if he have than share his source.
کھالی پلائو
If your source cannot stop his toung so it’s mean he is security risk.My source lives in my house and flies JF.17s for a living while you're blindly firing your guns here and there so please don't argue uselessly.
Size matters.I really wonder why Takbir wasn't used on 27th Feb. It has 100km range as compared to MK 83 REK of 60km.
I really wonder why Takbir wasn't used on 27th Feb. It has 100km range as compared to MK 83 REK of 60km.
I wonder if the CEP is different - we didn't want any human casualties or collateral damage at all that day.
Size matters.
REK carries bigger bomb...
Can you stop arguing please. If you dont agree with this assertion please present a argument rather than just banter and leg pulling.If your source cannot stop his toung so it’s mean he is security risk.
It seems to be just a handful of pilots. In fact, several Mirage pilots in the mid-2000s were also flying with MSA Gallet helmets. The PAF by and large is still a Gentex home.Looks like the PAF is shifting towards the MSA gallet as standard issue for JF-17View attachment 616800 View attachment 616801
what are the advantages of one helmet over the other?It seems to be just a handful of pilots. In fact, several Mirage pilots in the mid-2000s were also flying with MSA Gallet helmets. The PAF by and large is still a Gentex home.
View attachment 617050
This is an improved variant.View attachment 616625 View attachment 616627
So..its loaded upside down on the Thunder...Then after release it flips...
View attachment 616628
Nothing significant that I'm aware of.what are the advantages of one helmet over the other?