ziaulislam
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 23,621
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
from gulf excercise
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok video game which is not official ??
The only thing that the original super 7 had in with the eventual super 7/jf-17 was the name and that china was one of the partners. The JF-17 borrowed more from the Mig-33 (IZD 33) light fighter concept.
Hi there is nothing to be ashamed of JF17 did borrowed many design work of Mig33 i remmeber 20 years back when I was young in late teens this was discussed to death ,First PT1 was with out DSI and other goodies which we are seeing right now ,JF17 incorporates many tech from J20 program which was instrumental as Chinese were toying with the idea of DSI in 2000 they got hacked the F35 design and it was great days for Chinese aviation ,Real prestige point is we have 100 ,50 coming with AESA soon ,Its a famous saying "I lie ,I Cheat and I steal" who the **** cares we have working 4++ kicking @ss platformIndian jokers never seize trolling in JF-17 discussions, if they must than why do they forget JF-17 borrowed F-35 & F-16 technology?
When JF-17 was flying, Indian TEJA was having instrument panel. They adopted MFD lot later, can we say TEJA borrowed MFD from JF-17!
Indian jokers never seize trolling in JF-17 discussions, if they must than why do they forget JF-17 borrowed F-35 & F-16 technology?
When JF-17 was flying, Indian TEJA was having instrument panel. They adopted MFD lot later, can we say TEJA borrowed MFD from JF-17!
and how this one its quite similar to JF-17 in the term of design and philosophyI hope you aren't referring to me as an Indian joker... I stated simply that Mig-33/IZD-33 influence the design of the JF-17. IT wasnt the only one to do so. Rather the F-16, the F-35 (through dsi hack) and the Romanian IAR-95 all probably had some degree of design influence on the JF-17...
(IAR 95)
That isnt a bad thing and it isnt a copy of all of these or any of these fighters. Rather it took design elements from them and some that were the creation of the engineers at CAC and created the JF-17. I was countering the narative that it is based on the same super 7 concept of the CAC/grumman program which was based on Mig-21. The proportions amongst many other issues are completely off and the only thing they have in common are the ne of the original project, that they has side intakes and that china was a partner of the program that spawned them.
(Grumman Saber II/ Super 7 concepts)
Both fighters were designed to be indigenous and allow for a local aircraft good enough to supplant the F-16 (and other fighters) not available for purchase.and how this one its quite similar to JF-17 in the term of design and philosophy
F-CK-1 Ching-kuo
View attachment 463339 View attachment 463340
New radar, IRF probe,some new avonics, new EW from spain @sathyaCan anyone refer me to the post of block 2 improvements over block 1 ..
Thank you.
Its basically a upgrade of block-1 radar in block-2 rather than a new radar KLJ-7 in block-1 has a range of 75-80 km with a limited ground attack capability whereas KLJ-7V2 radar has range of 130 km has more air to ground modes better ECCM within the radarWith each blocks, Jf17 is going to have new radar ?
There is no table representation of Block 1 vs block 2 ?