Syed_Adeel
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2015
- Messages
- 508
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
If only things were this easy.
There are countless other parameters such as the effectiveness of the Radar of the Fighter and the Missile (terminal), the NEZ of the missile, the ability of the missile to outspeed its target in head to tail chase from 100+ km's away, the ability of the Missile to seek the intended target from amidst clutter (chaffs, flares, decoys) etc., and it's ability to continue intended operation despite intense ECM & Jamming etc.......then come the ability of the target to be 'visible' to the radar of both the attacking Jet and the missile along with the target's ability to defend itself using electronic means (such as SPECTRA on Rafale) or simply to outspeed or exhaust the missile etc.
And then come the ability of the missile to actually 'destroy' the target, after reaching it..........including hitting the target (kinetics & warhead) or proximity detonation (for maximum damage) etc.
All the things are true. BUT my dear these all parameters also apply on other bvrs as well NO ?.
your details doesnt prove the meteor orAIM120 superior.
I believe we need more time to know who is better. BUT one thing is clear that PAF is going to get much benefit out of it.