Windjammer
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2009
- Messages
- 41,319
- Reaction score
- 181
- Country
- Location
Since when has Block-52 adopted side intakes.this is not jf-17 block 3.it looks like f-16 block 52.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since when has Block-52 adopted side intakes.this is not jf-17 block 3.it looks like f-16 block 52.
Jani, kyun gehrai mein jatay ho !!!Since when has Block-52 adopted side intakes.
Ok, thanks , but this is not relevant to the threadThe Indo Pak Airspace is very suitable for a lightweight fighter like JF-17 Thunder to carry out its operations. We do not have enough space to fire a barrage of BVR missiles on each other and then turn away to respective airbases so 7 hard points configuration is enough as of now.
Indians are burdening their own selves with extra heavyweight large RCS fighters getting detected earlier and banged at the hands of PAF. Why spend 10 bucks when we can do it with just one. I think PAF is trying to keep thunder as silent as they can.
the thaings our fanboys and enthusiasts been wishing will make it JF-18 and it wont be a same plane anymore.PAF fanboys have been duped!
I knew from beginning that block 3 is not going to be any different from earlier blocks.
A Source tells me that this is the Model of JF-17 Block-3 that was presented to the PAF Air chief and other dignitaries who attended to witness the first flight of the type earlier this month.
Nothing is different in that aircraft vs any other single seats so far. There is already a picture of 19-262 under construction as well, which is likely the last block II to be produced for PAFThat is and I mentioned that later on
But !!!
The nose is definitely different, khair, whatsoever, B3 is not the concern, we can wait. The current situation is definitely A concern !!!
Recit Surah Shams and keep on praying for Armed forces !!!
What I did ???If you know how to read serials, that's definitely Block-II.
PAF doesn't want you to see the Block-III just yet.
I know, but that's not Block-III.
If im right, i get to kill @Zarvan, if im wrong, you get to kill Zarvan.
Bet?
No just asking for addition of two hard pointsYou are asking for a new plane : )
Nope. What happened on 26 Feb? Indians with thier strike packages and escorts were thier in huge numbers in different places and they distracted us and then came from AJKThe Indo Pak Airspace is very suitable for a lightweight fighter like JF-17 Thunder to carry out its operations. We do not have enough space to fire a barrage of BVR missiles on each other and then turn away to respective airbases so 7 hard points configuration is enough as of now.
Indians are burdening their own selves with extra heavyweight large RCS fighters getting detected earlier and banged at the hands of PAF. Why spend 10 bucks when we can do it with just one. I think PAF is trying to keep thunder as silent as they can.
What I did ???
No just asking for addition of two hard points
DSI is effective till around Mach 2 beyond that it has problem. F16 was already tested for it.And for that, the DSI has to be removed hence going back the super 7 route
F-16 tested DSI for the development for F-35DSI is effective till around Mach 2 beyond that it has problem. F16 was already tested for it.