A fairly up-to-date review of the current state of archaeology of the period in question is Eric H. Cline's 1177 B.C., The Year Civilization Collapsed, Princeton University Press, 2014. It discusses most of the Eastern Mediterranean basin c.12th century B.C., plus some bits a few centuries before and after.
Ok, then give us the name of the archaeological record, with Era, with summary how that archaeological record denies the multiple massacres of you religious Book.
About which era are they speaking?
And which archaeological records it is speaking which "refutes" that massacres didn't take place? I asked you to name the archaeological record which talks about the Era of Moses and his massacres. You named nothing but came up with name of Book (instead of Archaeological record) which even does not mention the Era and what type of archaeological record which deny these massacres.
Up till now your cunning modus operandi is this that since there is NO archaeological record of massacres, therefore these massacres didn't take place.
But then we also don't have any archaeological record of Banu Qurazah massacre, we don't have any archaeological record of 99.999% massacres, so why not to deny all of them?
And then there are no Archaeological records of existence of any Moses then deny the Moses too. And no records of existence of Abraham and his migration to Kannan, then deny his existence too. In fact deny all stories of the Torah which have no archaeological records, why to limit it to the multiple massacres only?
You're the one relying on a religious text here, not I
False.
These are Jews who are relying 100% on their religious text for even the existence of their Prophets, then what to talk about all the lengthy stories attached to those prophets.
No archaeological records who was Abraham? No record if Abraham was an Egyptian or from which other place he came. But still Jews believe 100% in their religious Texts only and claim to be the native of this whole land while there is not a single archaeological proof of it, while their own religious book refutes them several dozens of times telling that other Nations were the original native there.
- and furthermore, a text that Muslims claim the Jews have distorted, right? So who is on firmer ground here, exactly?
Ask it then from any Muslim, I am not a Muslim.
And issue is not of me or even of Muslim, but the issue here only concerns the Jews. What do the Jews think of their religious text? Do you themselves believe that their religious book is distorted one and the multiple stories of the massacres are only the fantasy stories?
Therefore, if Jews themselves claim that their religious text is compilation of the fantasy stories and no such multiple massacres took place, then they could not stop only upon the massacres, but then they have to stop believing the existence of their prophets and all the stories related to them, while there is not a single archaeological records for their existence, along for their being from Kannan, or for their being migrated from Egypt or from any other place in the world.
