Yes, that trick won't work to China, save it to their puppeteers.
Japanese are known to play double-faced trick in China.
They also play these tricks to Taiwan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, that trick won't work to China, save it to their puppeteers.
Japanese are known to play double-faced trick in China.
No it is just very poor taste, and reflects a lack of ethical and moral consideration. Period.
And my post was deleted. I insulted no one personally, no country, no nationality. But to protect Chinese sensitivity...
UNESCO rules allows anyone to submit a subject for preservation and teaching. So if the Tibetan exile government submit the issue of China-Tibet to UNESCO, what would China's reaction be ? Possibly equally 'childish' like Japan ?Nanjing massacre happened in China.
Undoubtedly the event and document of that event is significant in world history.
Therefore China submit the relevant documentation to preserve for humanity.
Japan is called "childish" would most likely because it try to exclude a well-known significant event in history.
This act of defiant is obviously a futile act. And yet it keep insisting on it. Hence childish.
Since the rule allow anyone, then anyone could submit as the rule say. I do not think China would think they can control UNESCO to stop the submission.UNESCO rules allows anyone to submit a subject for preservation and teaching. So if the Tibetan exile government submit the issue of China-Tibet to UNESCO, what would China's reaction be ? Possibly equally 'childish' like Japan ?
I am going to take a screenshot of this post because most likely it will be deleted to protect you guys from answering tough questions.
Japan may stop financial contributions to UNESCO: Suga
Politics Oct. 13, 2015 - 07:00AM JST
TOKYO, Japan — Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga said Monday the Japanese government will consider stopping financial contributions to UNESCO or reducing the amount, given the U.N. body’s decision to add Chinese documents on the Nanjing Massacre to the “Memory of the World” program.
The top Japanese government spokesman made the remarks on a TV program.
UNESCO’s decision on Saturday drew an immediate protest from the Japanese government questioning whether the U.N. body was “neutral and fair” in registering them.
Beijing’s dossier on the widespread killings of Chinese citizens and soldiers following the 1937 capture of Nanjing by the Japanese military is among dozens of new additions of documentary items, also including two sets of archives from Japan.
The Japanese government lodged a protest Saturday with the Chinese Foreign Ministry via the Japanese Embassy in Beijing, saying China “should not unnecessarily use the arena of UNESCO for a political purpose,” according to Japanese officials.
The “Documents of the Nanjing Massacre” consists of court documents from the International Military Tribunal for the Far East that convicted several Japanese as war criminals and a Chinese military tribunal, among others. They also include photos of the killings said to have been taken by the Imperial Japanese Army and film footage taken by an American missionary.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Link: Japan may stop financial contributions to UNESCO: Suga ‹ Japan Today: Japan News and Discussion
@Nihonjin1051 @yoshi.oda @ChineseTiger1986 @Chinese Bamboo @Chinese-Dragon
Now you are way off-topic.You mean China have not used tactics like diplomacy and/or economics to coerce other countries into submission over Taiwan ? Compelling other countries into submission to China over Taiwan is 'the worse'. And you really think that China will respond positively if the Tibetan exile government submit its own documents detailing China's oppression of Tibet ?
It is a fact that the Japan has a baggage of the past...Japan has to accept and move it forward. By opposing certain things which are very open in public forum, it is a not doing any good with the reputation of Japan as the present day Japan is no longer seen to associated with the previous Japan which fought war with China...
So i think people of Japan are matured enough to deal with and move forward without the silly talk of boycotting UNESCO...
Well, it is not that relevant since every countries of the world use cohesion for its own interest.It is not off topic. It is about behavior at the national level and it is appropriate. You may not like how Japan responds, but in calling Japan 'childish' is distracting from the real source, which is: Why would a country -- any country -- objects to UNESCO preservation of an event ?
The 'any country' includes China because there are events, even current events, that China do not want the world to have a negative perception of. The world is already in disapproval of what goes on about Tibet. So for you to dismiss China's reaction about Tibet as 'hypothetical' when China's reactions about Taiwan have been anything but hypothetical is simply hypocritical on your part.
While past behaviors are no guarantees of future behaviors, they do serves as hints as to what a person or country would most likely trend.
Most of my posts contain "LOL". I like making fun of people stupid logic. LOL Like I said, my point is to stick to the topic at hand. You know it I was right.
I guess this post show most people lacking of Critical Thinking Skill
There are 2 issues on this.
1.)Whether or not the Nanjing Massacre site/document should be listed in the UNESCO archive
2.)Japanese reaction to UNESCO.
Set aside if Nanjing Massacre site should be listed. It's honestly quite stupid to say Japan act childish on the issue. The reaction is normal as they are the only reasonable way for a country to protest, otherwise there are nothing else...US would have done the same if Vietnam loge an application on My Lai massacre site to UNESCO....
The question itself should be whether or not Nanjing Massacre site should be listed. And to be fair, that did cover two other question, the first one is, if Nanjing Massacre should be listed, then what about the other massacre? Then tomorrow even sandy hook would start UNESCO application......
Another question is that is Massacre relate to world peace? Which was the main aim of UNESCO program.
I can accept any debate on whether or not the site should be admitted. But if all you want to talk about is how Japanese being childish, then you should also call yourselves childish to begin with...
Neither is it off topic
It is not a joke, but a fact! I'm giving an example of what consider an appropriate registration to UNESCO.You should know that Japanese people don't like taking nuclear disasters as a joke and nuclear disasters are certainly not a joke and there is nothing to laugh about it.
People are calling Japan childish not because their protest,but because they are threatening to withdraw funding.
Prostest, it is their right.
Give funding to the organization as a member, it is their obligation.
pretty sure even a child knows the difference.
Japan — Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga said Monday the Japanese government will consider stopping financial contributions to UNESCO or reducing the amount
Source: https://defence.pk/threads/japan-threatens-to-stop-funding-unesco.402847/#ixzz3oWdbpw53