Dungeness
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2015
- Messages
- 7,461
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
It IS a way to protest, so I don't see why you are fuzzed.
It is a way to protest, but it doesn't seem noble.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It IS a way to protest, so I don't see why you are fuzzed.
It is a way to protest, but it doesn't seem noble.
Then all the more reasons you Chinese should stop giving Japan a hard time since you pretty much admitted that all countries want at least the appearance of being saintly. Stop trying to put your China on a high moral horse when your own actions in Tibet warrants submission. Calling Japan's response 'childish' is childish in its own way when you know, without admitting it, that your China would do similar, if not the same, if put into the same situation.Well, it is not that relevant since every countries of the world use cohesion for its own interest.
I think the one that use it the most, belongs to the national flag that you are displaying. Should I then concluded that US if put under similar circumstances, would first put political pressure, and then economical sanction, and if that doesn't work, military action to topple over the UN!! Because as you suggest, past behaviors provide a hint on future behaviors.
There are event and there are event. Nanjing Massacre is a world significant event that has a well established, main stream world view. It is unwise to even attempt to white-wash such a well accepted view.
Anybody that has some understanding of how the world work, would have understand that the UN could not possibly give in to Japanese threat. That threat is empty.
And your logic of a hypothetical <insert country here> would react as "childish" as Japan would, do not make the Japanese's act any less unwise. Two wrong doesn't make a right.
Most of my posts contain "LOL". I like making fun of people stupid logic. LOL Like I said, my point is to stick to the topic at hand. You know it I was right.
The Manila massacre deserves to be in UNESCO. If Aquino has any pride in his country, he will register. LOL
Well, personally I think what Japanese has done is "childish".Then all the more reasons you Chinese should stop giving Japan a hard time since you pretty much admitted that all countries want at least the appearance of being saintly. Stop trying to put your China on a high moral horse when your own actions in Tibet warrants submission. Calling Japan's response 'childish' is childish in its own way when you know, without admitting it, that your China would do similar, if not the same, if put into the same situation.
Same with slavery in America...Then this means both the Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward should also be in UNESCO, judging the "criteria" you presented.
Dude, it said
It IS a way to protest, so I don't see why you are fuzzed.
Then it boils down to whether the amount Japan used to pay was mandatory or they were paying extra, out of good will.
Even the latter, still means no strings attached and shouldn‘t be used as leverage. And to think they can pay their war crimes to go away? well..it still sounds naive and childish to me.
Have you really checked the link you posted? What a joke you are?Same with slavery in America...
Category:Memory of the World Register - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And Australia with the Aborigines, China and Tibet, the Muslim conquests, the Christian Crusades, the Holocaust, the Armenian genocide, and just about every atrocities every country done.
But the list of what are in the register is nothing like that.
Same with slavery in America...
Category:Memory of the World Register - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And Australia with the Aborigines, China and Tibet, the Muslim conquests, the Christian Crusades, the Holocaust, the Armenian genocide, and just about every atrocities every country done.
But the list of what are in the register is nothing like that.
As I said, it was a mean to protest, you may think it's childish, but this is a way. As I said, US will and Did done this as well. So, I don't know what the fuzz is all about??
US cuts Unesco funds over vote for Palestinian seat - BBC News
So? The US did this because they can get away with it. Another childish thinking on Japan‘s part that they could pull off the same thing as the US.US will and Did done this as well
Ya, the childish way.
So? The US did this because they can get away with it. Another childish thinking on Japan‘s part that they could pull off the same thing as the US.
Nah that‘s boycotting,totally different.You seems to misunderstood hat I said.
EVERYONE DOES IT. EVEN CHINA
China banks pull out of IMF Tokyo meet amid island row: WSJ| Reuters
America said slavery was wrong. So was discrimination against blacks, Asians, and other groups, as well as what happened to the Native Americans. We taught this in our schools that what happened was wrong. When I was in West Germany, the Germans taught their people that what happened in WW II was wrong. When I was in Italy, the Italians admitted that Italian fascism was terrible for Italy and for Europe.The problem about this issue is that some people will use the past as ammunition for their nationalistic rhetoric to the point that they would likely do such actions to other people or country that were inflicted onto them in the past.