What's new

Japan Calls for China To Explain Aircraft Carrier

. .
don,t know why every one is paranoid with chinese .....
mean china don,t have any aggressive doctrine still she is being treated as threat

Because today's developed nations were the looters in the past, and they are afraid that a strong China gonna lead a revolution against them with the third world nations.

It is their sins of the past that betray them.
 
. .
Next would be xyz calls for China to explain the deployment of J-15 Flying Shark onboard Chinese Aircraft Carrier.

In essence the development of future Chinese Aircraft Carriers are to protect national/international Chinese interests in the regional and international seas and protect friendly nations cargoes and other naval ships in hours of need from blackmailers.

Chinese+J-15+Flying+Shark++%25289%2529+The+People%2527s+Liberation+Army+Navy+%2528PLAN+or+PLA+Navy%2529+china+aircraft+carrier+flying+takeoff.jpg
 
. .
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE | PUBLISHED:12
AUG 2011 09:37

TOKYO - Japan's defense minister called
on China on Aug. 12 to explain why it
needs an aircraft carrier, after Beijing
sparked increased concerns over its
military expansion by starting sea trials
for the vessel. "As an aircraft carrier, it is of a highly
maneuverable and offensive nature. We
want China to explain the reasons why
it needs it," Toshimi Kitazawa told
reporters. "There is no doubt that it will have a big
impact on the region," he added. China put the revamped Soviet-built
aircraft carrier Varyag to sea on Aug.
10, prompting the United States to call
for an explanation. Beijing has sought to play down the
vessel's capability, saying it will mainly
be used for training and "research." In its annual defense report last week,
Japan expressed concern over China's growing assertiveness and widening
naval reach in nearby waters and the Pacific and over what it called the "opaqueness" of Beijing's military budget. China criticized the report as "irresponsible," insisting its drive to
modernize its forces was entirely
defensive.

Reads like a "made in USA" piece of propaganda, worthy of the NYT.

Chinese friends realize that "greatness" is not just a word, it is a idea and above all, action - China has been "great" for thousands of years and realize that India are not it's enemy, for China has no enemies that can rival the civilization and achievement of China as a country.

And the confidence in it's ability to generate "greatness" offers China the ability to take a long view - Today's China is well aware of it's fate in the 18th and 19 centuries and the terrible cost China suffered to renew China as a Nation. This long view allows China to be confident and humble, china is first and always accountable to her peoples and not the straps of a alien arrogant power thousands of miles away.

Japan too, is a great nation and there is much to learn from Japan.
 
.
No it is called superior J-15 which has its roots in SU-33, you are weak at identifying aircraft that is poor knowledge.

leave him alone``he is full-time troller``god know how many times he got banned for that`he just needs some cheap shot for his pathetic life
 
.
well every chinese ac have its roots in russian planes:rofl:

Is it bad, lets see 90% of india military products are directly russian.

Now stop derailing the thread, you have been reported.
 
. .
For regional security China should not mind these baseless calls but China should need to develop more military carriers and naval technology to protect its boundaries and prove itself a sign of stability in east & south east Asia.
 
. .
a great confession of 21st century!!!

P.S: Please, my Pakistani and Chinese friends please help me out with that jam, I am speechless now, I am exhausted becuz of paranoid idiots....it seems nothing can cure the sickness, logical words are ineffective to those patients!!!?

Okay first of all you're Cambodian. :) End of. :) Ouch! lool anyways why so much ahtred from a Cambodian if Cambodians are not pro-Indians not anti-Indians at least after all it's called Indochina for a reason. Or are you one of them Chinese minorities living in Cambodia? It's understandable. :)

That highlighted part was so uncalled for. Nevermind. Anyways paranoid of what? Seriously I fail to comprehend but can you please elaborate so a simpleton like can understand your vocabulary? lool :P and why Pakistani and Chinese members? If you are willing to speak for Chinese and disagree with me then you might as well put your point forward. If you have one. :)

Is that why India is sneaking money through Turkey to Iran? If you really had the stones to "speak against" the US, you'd wouldn't care what sanctions they want you to observe. Afterall China doesn't give a fck, does it?

Paid $150m to Iran through Turkey route: HPCL - Moneycontrol.com -

That was following the payment problem after America put sanctions on them. No need to overrule America right now unless we absolutely have to. American is one of our strategic partner right now :P Okay you tell me one thing, did China used to overrule America before 15-20 years like it does today? It is because of your new found wealth and military might that you are confronting and challenging America on every single stage right now. Give us 15-20 years of pure progress like China had and then we can talk. :)

Nehru started the 1962 war. Read a non-Indian source about it.

Yes but do you know why did he obtain the forward policy? There had been a series of violent border incidents after the 1959 Tibetan uprising, when India had granted asylum to the Dalai Lama. That's why.

And some circles in India also say that he underestimated Chinese military strength at that time and thought he would annex Tibet from communist China and gift it to Dalai Lama as it was occupied by Chinese at that time and Tibet would serve as a Buffer state between India and China. But in order to please Lama he challenged Chinese. And India had to pay with 1500 soldiers blood and a defeat. Plus made our 5000 years old friendly state an adversary. Stupid leadership if you ask me.

In short: India fought a war which it didn't have anything to do with.
 
.
To be honest, this is a stupid question. Even by US and Japan's standards considering that they know what a carrier is used for: projecting power. Rather than scrapping of their stupid ARTICLE 9, they're sitting and asking questions. Perfect. Never expected that the Samurai of one time would end up becoming like this.
 
.
It is inspired by Su33. Looks mean. Also we are in no position to laugh on the Chinese regarding indigenous aviation technology.

u dont have to degrade ur country, believe what u want to believe, the airframe is a copy for sure
 
.
Back
Top Bottom