What's new

jaguar-land-rover-sues-chinese-automaker-over-evoque-copycat

Loafer

BANNED
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
962
Reaction score
-48
Country
India
Location
India
.
Unable to copy paste the entire article here.

Judging the article content, not surprised the economic times chaps were scared someone might copy their article.

Article from another source

Jaguar Land Rover sues Chinese automaker over Evoque copycat: source
BEIJING | BY JAKE SPRING
for allegedly copying the British firm's Range Rover Evoque, a person with direct knowledge of the matter said - a rare move by a foreign automaker"

The new Range Rover Evoque is seen at the Jaguar-Land Rover exhibition booth during the International Motor Show (IAA) in Frankfurt, September 14, 2011.

Jaguar Land Rover is suing Chinese automaker Jiangling Motor (000550.SZ) for allegedly copying the British firm's Range Rover Evoque, a person with direct knowledge of the matter said - a rare move by a foreign automaker to fight copycats in the world's biggest autos market.

A spokesman for JLR, owned by India's Tata Motors (TAMO.NS), said in brief emailed comments to Reuters that a court in Beijing's eastern Chaoyang district "served Jiangling with newly filed actions surrounding copyright and unfair competition." He declined to elaborate.

The suit relates to Jiangling's Landwind X7 sport utility vehicle copying the design of the Evoque, JLR's first China-made model that went on sale last year, said the person with knowledge of the legal proceedings, who is not authorized to talk to the media and didn't want to be named.

A spokesman for Landwind declined to comment.

Despite widespread and often blatant copying, global automakers generally don't take legal action in China as they feel the odds of winning against local firms are low. Also, a lawsuit can be bad for branding if the Chinese public think a foreign company is bullying domestic competitors.

If JLR wins its case, it could prompt other automakers to also take legal action, said Chen Jihong, a Beijing-based lawyer at Zhong Lun Law Firm, speeding up a shift to stronger enforcement of intellectual property rights.


CLOSE RESEMBLANCE

Landwind unveiled a new version of its X7 SUV in November 2014, drawing criticism for its striking likeness to the Evoque, an imported version of which was already on sale in China.

The two SUVs have a similar shape, with the roof and windows tapering from front to back, and near identical tail lights and character lines on the side paneling. The X7's front grille is slightly more rounded than the hard edges of the Evoque.

The slight differences between the two cars can be virtually eliminated using widely available kits that allow a Range Rover grille, logo and Land Rover badges to be put on an X7. Kits on Alibaba's (BABA.N) Taobao shopping website cost around 128 yuan (£13.39).

The X7 costs around a third of the price of an Evoque, and is some way behind in technology and performance, said Yale Zhang, managing director of Automotive Foresight.

JLR and Jiangling have agreed that Landwind will not sell the X7 in Brazil, the source said, where it recently appointed an importer. The two automakers are also discussing what Landwind can and can't do in any X7 design update, the person said.

JLR sales fell by a fifth in China in January-March of last year - when it launched its China-made Evoque - after rising 36 percent in the same 2014 period. In the same period this year, JLR's China sales rose 19 percent.

A lawsuit could be a long and grueling process.

It took Honda Motor (7267.T), for example, 12 years to win a case in China against a little-known local automaker - for copying its best-selling CR-V SUV - according to a report by the official Xinhua news agency, confirmed by a Honda spokesman.

Even then, the Japanese firm was awarded only 16 million yuan ($2.43 million) in compensation. It had sought 300 million yuan.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-jaguar-land-rover-china-lawsuit-idUSKCN0YP1JJ
 
.
Nice copy..

evo5.jpg




Range-Rover-Evoque-Replica-Landwind-X7-Side.jpg
 
.
.
Anyways ... anyways Jaguar Land Rover never stop selling cars to China, even there'r Jiangling Auto's Land Wind X7, they won't willing to lose China market. So both Land Rover & Land wind will live in PEACE in China. :coffee:

COOL car is the cool car, whatever it's Range Rover Evoque or Wind Land X7 ... the only better thing, is Chinese enjoying the Evoque design with 1/3 price in China. Still thanks JiangLing Auto, improve our Chinese living quality !

If most Chinese family can't afford the expensive price of Range Rover Evoque, one solution is just building it by our hands ... there's the WindLand X7 or "Evoque" Made in China ! :-)
500_9497c334-c4e1-4f7d-b4c2-3bbe78bbac10.jpg

2014112201_c164afefaae2beb95fdfYAJcLN9iEIlv.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
:what: They really do not look like COPIES!!
I mean, a car was bound to have a few doors and wheels etc. There are considerable differences in the shape for me, more then what companies launch and label as "new model". There sure a differences and cannot be classified as a copy.

EDIT: Oh, yeah,, i saw those wheels now, they are round on both.
Chinese you copy cats!! :astagh:

:lol: Silly corporate world!!
 
.
:what: They really do not look like COPIES!!
I mean, a car was bound to have a few doors and wheels etc. There are considerable differences in the shape for me, more then what companies launch and label as "new model". There sure a differences and cannot be classified as a copy.

EDIT: Oh, yeah,, i saw those wheels now, they are round on both.
Chinese you copy cats!! :astagh:

:lol: Silly corporate world!!
Exactly! They look a world apart. Some so called car experts.
 
.
Lol, Even blind can tell the , Fenders, lights, door arcs, glasses design are same, 90% car is of same design....... lol

Copy means main designing copy. of base design , its way ahead from your knowledge , as you not designer of any of original products....
 
.
Lol, Even blind can tell the , Fenders, lights, door arcs, glasses design are same, 90% car is of same design....... lol

Copy means main designing copy. of base design , its way ahead from your knowledge , as you not designer of any of original products....
Interesting part is , the Chinese maker has even named it "landwind" in order to leech of brand name of Landrover

The audacity is amazing here, almost as if the maker is proud of his capability to copy.
 
.
:what: They really do not look like COPIES!!
I mean, a car was bound to have a few doors and wheels etc. There are considerable differences in the shape for me, more then what companies launch and label as "new model". There sure a differences and cannot be classified as a copy.

EDIT: Oh, yeah,, i saw those wheels now, they are round on both.
Chinese you copy cats!! :astagh:

:lol: Silly corporate world!!
lol, 90% of companies which design products do not think like you. copy of based design, that's why Jag is not suing your Mehran cars design. lol

Interesting part is , the Chinese maker has even named it "landwind" in order to leech of brand name of Landrover

The audacity is amazing here, almost as if the maker is proud of his capability to copy.
Remember , " Pulser Bike" , Chinese copy "Gulser" , mastery in copying brand name also.
 
.
.
lol, 90% of companies which design products do not think like you. copy of based design, that's why Jag is not suing your Mehran cars design. lol
With all due respect, by this action i doubt if they THINK at all!! At least when it comes to these things.
AND no where i said that Chinese DO NOT COPY stuff, they do!! Also i do not understand why would the deny it or what is the shame there. Corporate espionage is something the worlds invests millions and billions in! I was just stating that these are some considerable difference there in that particular pic!!

Remember , " Pulser Bike" , Chinese copy "Gulser" , mastery in copying brand name also.
:lol:
 
. .
This funny Indian seems caring China more than than India. This week alone he has already started 3 threads like this in our section.
Last we recall Jaguar is owned by Indian automotive major TATA.

Is it an Indian member's mistake, if a Chinese automaker chose to copycat a Jaguar Landrover vehicle?

Maybe in your culture copying is something to take pride in, but not so in rest of planet.

Whats ironical and amusing is the same Chinese members justifying copying here hypocritically brag about Chinese originality by opening threads like below:

https://defence.pk/threads/forbes-how-made-in-china-became-cool.431758/
 
Last edited:
.
why dose china copy? its planes / bikes/ cars based on stealing other designs......
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/3466117.stm

You mean you too high horse? :lol:

Interesting part is , the Chinese maker has even named it "landwind" in order to leech of brand name of Landrover

The audacity is amazing here, almost as if the maker is proud of his capability to copy.
It's in China, what can you do? We will squeeze the west until their profit dry. End of the day, it's always the west companies fold up. Nobody can fight the Chinese :D
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom