You've yet to clarify how that conflation of Hinduism & Hindutva has affected your constitutional rights .This is yet another example of Shifting of the goal posts , since that was your original concern to begin with .I see why you aren't too eager for this debate and why you're ignoring the rest of my argument to your previous points .
In trying to trip me , you expose yourself .Contradictions galore .On the one hand you want to have the pleasure of ridiculing my ignorance of the said judgement under discussion .On the other , in a move with the benefit of hindsight you want to pretend to ensnare me by not conflating your views of Hinduism and Hindutva arguing as you do that had I been aware of the judgement , I would have claimed Hindutva is a way of life too and you did what you did to pre empt such action .
Well , I was aware of the judgement .Just that I didn't think it relevant to bring it up here .You did .I'm countering your narrative .
I would always maintain that Hindutva is a politico religious ideology for the simple reason to borrow from your terminology that I'm not a "bhakt ". Its as simple as that.Just to recapitulate , my dear descendant of rice converts - Hinduism is both a personal belief and way of life and Hindutva is a politico religious ideology .I've yet to understand why does a person of your considerable " gifts "and "intellect " not collect fellow descendants of rice converts and file a review petition in the SC arguing your case there instead of indulging in breast beating out here .
You're speaking to the son of a retired Mumbai HC lawyer .I do not need Google search or translation , descendant of rice convert , unlike you .Sorry to disappoint you . The said orbiter dicta is as the definition of the term suggests a non binding observation not to be considered as a legal precedent in a court of law .If it bothers descendant of rice converts like you and other fellow converts out here , feel free to approach the SC unless and I think this is the next insidious argument you will spring with appropriate "justifications "that you do not trust our state institutions .
Another false presumption by you .Yet not one single word how this conflation has compromised your constitutional rights .
I'm not interested in reading that report .That's how it's going to be .To quote
@Gadkari , you don't get to decide the framework of the debate by choosing sources you want to & insisting on its perusal by your opponents .There's plenty of dissenting literature in our domain by indigenous sources .Feel free to pick it up and quote from it .I shall counter , if need be .
As I said more than exposing me , you stand exposed .I never labelled you prior to this post .You started with the presumption of me being a "bhakt ".I will reciprocate your gesture .All you've done is reveal yourself as a Hindu baiter .Something that was amply clear in your shifty waffling arguments since I engaged you .
That's what happens when Matters pertaining to religion is decided on half baked knowledge - the results of which is clear to see in your country .
It seems to me based on your rather limited intellect and even more limited education , you think you have a patent on the word "Pak" just because your nation derives its name from the word .