Parashuram1
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2010
- Messages
- 954
- Reaction score
- 0
Oh my friend, but no one can ever prove what actually happened in that conflict. The eye witnesses there who support your country would speak in your favour, the soldiers who fought are no more... it ultimately boils down to relying on Bangladeshi newspapers.you have made up a Nice story.
Solomon we are not out there doing mass murders of our own people .
That was a civil war and nothing can be proven from the either side so what is the fuss in your brain about 71 ??
If you have any Proofs why dont you bring them on ?
Why drag Indians in between? The discussion here is about Pakistan's situation and that of this rebel force you speak of. Speaking of Blood Tears, there is also a very famous document called the Blood Telegram. Before declaring it as an Indian propaganda, why not take a look at that too? One can only take fair decisions if he/she sees both sides of the coin.
The apologies demanded were in respect to what incidents of violence against civilians happened and not collateral damage. Otherwise, the apologies won't have been an issue to Pakistani government for so long. I mean what guilt could your government have in apologizing for collateral damage if that was indeed the case? This is similar to the situation between China and Japan on World War till date.